|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 09:40 AM Original message |
Hillary Campaign Won't Air Ads Attacking Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
x-g.o.p.er (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 09:43 AM Response to Original message |
1. Then they're doomed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 09:47 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Just because they say they are not running negative ads doesn't mean they won't smear him otherwise. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
x-g.o.p.er (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 10:24 AM Response to Reply #3 |
15. True, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 09:43 AM Response to Original message |
2. They should've started when Obama announced in Time he was going to go negative. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 09:51 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. say wa? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Karmadillo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 09:56 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Link on starting the Muslim school rumors and claiming a file of really bad stuff? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skip Intro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 10:11 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Second that call for links please. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gaiilonfong (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 10:13 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. YOU DON'T NEED A LINK FOR THAT NONSENSE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Karmadillo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 10:16 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. If everyone knows it, someone should be able to provide proof. So how about a link? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kahuna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 12:42 PM Response to Reply #8 |
24. A simple search on DU will yield you many results. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Karmadillo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 11:09 PM Response to Reply #24 |
29. If it's a simple search, then you should be able to provide a link with no trouble. Except you don't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 11:13 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. It suggest to me that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Karmadillo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 11:31 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. A volunteer! Thanks! I'm sure YOU can post a link that supports the smear made above. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Karmadillo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-06-08 07:10 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. Strangely enough, no links. Lots of unsupported accusations, though. Is this the new bipartisanship? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 10:23 AM Response to Reply #7 |
14. "everyone knows the Clinton 's started that crap"? Link, please? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 10:19 AM Response to Reply #4 |
10. "who the hell started the muslim school rumors?" Link or slink. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 11:48 AM Response to Reply #10 |
20. what bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 12:11 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. "You guys really suck." Typical ObamaNation rsponse. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 10:20 AM Response to Reply #4 |
11. "who mentioned cocaine?" Barack Obama did is his great book. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 10:21 AM Response to Reply #4 |
12. "who claimed they had a file on him with really bad stuff?" RW devil Bob Novak. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 10:19 AM Response to Original message |
9. Saying that Clinton is "just like bush" is 1. a lie and 2. negative |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 10:22 AM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Link to Obama saying that Clinton is "just like bush" please. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 10:26 AM Response to Reply #13 |
16. dang jefferson_dem. There were dozens of posts on it the other day |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killbotfactory (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 01:53 PM Response to Reply #16 |
28. Dozens of posts alright |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 11:49 AM Response to Reply #9 |
21. well, there are similarities. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 12:47 PM Response to Reply #21 |
25. your distortions and talking points are so dishonest and ugly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 01:33 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. and to hell with the constitution, in the meantime. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 01:44 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. more vitrolic distortion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ayeshahaqqiqa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 10:36 AM Response to Original message |
17. Well, good for them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RFKJrNews (760 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 10:39 AM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Yep, Huckabee's win in Iowa proved that point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalhistorian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 10:45 AM Response to Original message |
19. Yeah, right. One of the chief aims of her campaign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quixote1818 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 12:02 PM Response to Original message |
22. But are they going to show it to the press like the Huck? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-05-08 11:15 PM Response to Original message |
31. hillary doesn't want her ass |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 01st 2024, 10:51 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC