Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fox News guest analyzes why Hillary Clinton lost the male vote

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
antiimperialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 09:57 PM
Original message
Fox News guest analyzes why Hillary Clinton lost the male vote
Edited on Fri Jan-04-08 10:00 PM by antiimperialist


On the January 4th edition of "On Your World" with Neil Cavuto, Marc Rudov, author of Under the Clitoral Hood: How to Crank Her Engine Without Cash, Booze, or Jumper Cables, asserted: "When Barack Obama speaks, men hear, 'Take off for the future.' And when Hillary Clinton speaks, men hear, 'Take out the garbage.' " During his appearance on the show, on-screen text read: "Rudov: Clinton's 'nagging voice' is reason she lost male vote."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
muntrv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. No, it's because too many males mentally still live in pre-historic times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. So true, so many here last night posted F.U. B**** in regards to Hillary.
It was pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. What About Women and Young People?
They also fled from Clinton - are they pre-historic as well?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. That is a stupid, ignorant comment, and pre-historic in and of itself.
Edited on Fri Jan-04-08 10:16 PM by Atman
How about "too many males decided they think she'd make a bad president?"

What the fuck?

It's like AA and their "if you deny you have a problem it means you have a problem" circular bullshit. So, being a white male, I'm not allowed to dislike Hillary? I'm just supposed to genuflect and vote for her because she's got bumps on her chest and and no penis?

She's a horrible choice for president, that's why I wouldn't vote for her! She's a DLC war-mongering corporate whore, and scarcely any better than the current one, and I find it incredibly insulting to claim that any man who refuses to vote Hillary is simply a misogynistic Neanderthal. Some people actually follow politics and understand Hillary's positions, believe it or not. I could give a shit about her voice, her looks, her tits, her husband, whatever. I care about her politics, which are the ONLY reason I would never vote for Hillary.

Unless she was my ONLY choice.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muntrv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. I said "TOO MANY MALES." Not "ALL MALES."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
17. True that too...good point Atman, those guys make a bad name for men who...
Edited on Sat Jan-05-08 10:42 AM by Triana
..don't support Hillary for actual LEGITIMATE reasons.

Heck, I don't support her for the same reasons YOU don't - and I've had DUers tell me it's because I'm a WOMAN!

BWAH!


Good grief!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Like me telling you to go fuck yourself?
I guess my anger towards you insulting me and other men is because I live in pre-historic timems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muntrv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Did I say "ALL MALES?" No, I said "TOO MANY."
Edited on Fri Jan-04-08 10:43 PM by muntrv
Fuck yourself? Real classy!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Neil Cavuto, Marc Rudov, say no more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
16. Exactly. As much as they cannot stand Hillary, I can't stand THEM...
...the SIGHT of them is revolting. Not to mention their whiney male voices. The irony IS rather amusing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
9. This Rudov creature sounds like he hates women
I'd never heard of this freak, but when I saw his picture it startled me! He reminds me of this guy who was (unfortunately) crazy about me 5 years ago. He was a damned frizz-head and had what looked like a a glued-on coat of matted hair on his back, only it was his own. The weirdo needed a lawnmower, not a shaver. How come it's always the ugliest runts that hate women? Or maybe they hate women because women don't want ugly runts like him?

Since he hates women so damned much maybe he should try men. I'll gladly send him a jar of vaseline to make his decision easier.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 02:41 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Those types hate women because they can't get laid unless they pay for it.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. LOL! Absolutely! We all know the type. ewwww!
They should crawl back into whatever hole they live in and leave the beautiful world alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
10. There is a slight measure of irony there that might want to be noted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
13. backwards and in highheels
and with all the negative press from the far left and far right, she was virtually tied with Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. Backwards and in highheels,
I love it. I've been watching TCM's string of Ginger Rogers movies and I was just thinking how appropriate those words are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
x-g.o.p.er Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
14. If you have an ex-wife...
She is the epitome of what that is, from my friends that have one.

I can't stand her for a lot of reasons, but her voice isn't one of them.

Her condascending arrogance is right up there, though. Along with her sense of entitlement to the job,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
15. What the hell kind of "analysis" would you expect from a pig who wrote a book...
...called "Under the Clitoral Hood: How to Crank Her Engine Without Cash, Booze, or Jumper Cables"

OR from FauxSnooze?

BOTH of them have ISSUES - SERIOUS ones.

Corprat misogynist issues.

That's not an analysis. It's a "keep them wimmin in they place" and a "I'm gon' show dem people out day what an idjit I am by tellin 'em my thoughts" convention.

Pffft!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
18. wow..FOX???
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC