Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New Hampshire! Vote Free or be Iowa!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 03:44 PM
Original message
New Hampshire! Vote Free or be Iowa!
Iowa rubberstamped the MSM's darlings, and now Joe Biden and Chris Dodd aren't in the race.
New Hampshire has a chance to shrug off the MSM presure and make history!
Please vote for the man who "has arguably the best resume of any candidate for the presidency in nation’s history"!
Live Free, New Hampshire! Vote Bill Richardson!
Richardson instinctive with Iowa-flavored humor
by: Douglas Burns

RED OAK -- ...rural Iowans love humor. Go into any coffee shop, local eatery, bar or grain elevator. Have lunch with the Rotary or Kiwanis clubs. Customers joke with waitresses. Truck drivers joke with clerks. Old men in feed hats spend hours over 30-cent cups of coffee giving each other the business over something or another. In our more urban areas, and the growing spirit-crushing suburbs, there are a lot Hillary Clintons. She's rushing to the White House. They're rushing to Bed, Bath & Beyond. But in my part of the state, western Iowa, the place where the caucuses will be decided, naturally folksy humor goes a long way.

Of the top four Democratic candidates in the race, Bill Richardson, the New Mexico governor, is most natural with a Sunday lemonade-brand of spontaneous humor. It’s instinctive for him, and it’s one of the reasons he’s climbing in the polls. He’s disarming. The jokes get people to see past the suit and tie and title and platoon of earnest young staffers. “We hit 10 percent,” Richardson said Saturday in Red Oak. “That’s pretty good for having been at the margin of error.” Richardson noted that New Mexico now has eight movies being made in the state. “One of the conditions is that I have to star in all of them,” he joked, with a wink to the fact that's he's a few pounds ahead of leading man fighting weight.

Near the end of his visit to Red Oak, Richardson tapped the shoulder of a woman sitting next to him while making a point about education. The woman clearly hadn’t been paying full attention to his remarks and was a little startled. “Did I wake you up?” said Richardson with a wide smile. He tapped his watch and said, “I’ll finish soon.”
In Denison a few weeks ago Richardson said he signed a smoking ban in New Mexico but exempted cigar bars. He shrugged and told the audience, “Hey, I’m a cigar smoker.” Richardson talks about how he will work on Iraq the first day he’s in office, energy independence the next, and health-care and education on the third day. “The fourth day,” he says, pausing. “I’ll take off.” That line works on so many levels.

The new advertisements in which Richardson sits down for a job interview for the presidency with a rude, sandwich-chomping “employer,” are more humorous than much of the material late-night comics produce. Another reason humor works well for Richardson: There’s little danger the use of it will make him seem an unserious person. Richardson has arguably the best resume of any candidate for the presidency in the nation’s history: Governor, congressman, United Nations ambassador and Secretary of Energy. As Richardson hits the small towns of Iowa, pays his due the old-fashioned way, he’ll make many Iowans comfortable with him. He comes across as a person who genuinely likes people. The same cannot be said of all candidates.
http://www.iowaindependent.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=178
www.richardsonforpresident.com
www.2013isTooLate.com
www.TheDifferenceOnIraq.com
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Richardson's email to supporters re Iowa and NH:
http://www.richardsonforpresident.com/
I'm sorry I didn't get to you sooner.
We left Iowa at 11 last night and got into New Hampshire at 3 this morning. I've been doing events all day and I have to head out in a few minutes for a television interview.
While it might not look like it from the headlines, we accomplished a lot in Iowa. And I have you to thank for that.
Your trust was not only inspirational, it gave us the resources to run a very competitive campaign.
We mobilized nearly 20,000 voters and took 7% of the caucus-goers in the first round. But given the unique nature of the Iowa caucus process and the unexpectedly large turnout, we weren't able to hold onto all of those votes into the final round.
As I'm sure you've heard by now, I am not giving up. And I don't want you to, either.
If we learned anything in Iowa, it's that this race is still very fluid. And our folks in New Hampshire tell us that a lot of voters there are re-thinking their positions in light of what happened last night.
Suddenly, "inevitable" doesn't seem so inevitable anymore.
Right now I'm focused on tomorrow night's debate. And shoot, the way I look at it, I made the "Final Four"!
I'll be in touch,
Bill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. Best TV ad ever!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. OPED: Musharraf must go by Bill Richardson
OPED: Musharraf must go by Bill Richardson
Boston Globe | 01/03/2008

OPED: Musharraf must go by Bill Richardson
Boston Globe | 01/03/2008

Richardson Criticizes Bush
Washington Post | 12/29/2007

Richardson touts himself as tested leader
Gazzette Online | 12/29/2007

Bill Richardson: global troubleshooter
Concord Monitor | 12/27/2007

Richardson in Bluffs touts his experience
Omaha World-Herald | 12/27/2007

In The News »
PRESIDENT PERVEZ MUSHARRAF of Pakistan must go. Rather than waging the "unstinted" war against Al Qaeda that he promised, he has become a source of instability that terrorists are exploiting. Pakistan urgently needs a new government, and the United States should suspend all nonterrorism-related military aid until Musharraf steps aside.

Some in Washington say we should stick with the dictator, because they fear chaos might follow his departure. But the risk of chaos is far greater if Musharraf remains. Only a new government, with broader support than Musharraf has, can restore order to Pakistan and reengage an effective fight against Al Qaeda and the Taliban.

Last week's murder of Benazir Bhutto and the rioting that spread across the country, show that Musharraf cannot maintain order. He could not provide security for Bhutto, and he cannot provide security for Pakistan. His already meager support is plummeting further. Under Musharraf's rule, Al Qaeda has reconstituted itself with a Pakistani face. The editor of one of Pakistan's largest newspapers recently said that "Al Qaeda is now as much a Pakistani phenomenon as it is an Arab or foreign element." The Bush administration has given Musharraf over $10 billion in military aid - but the Al Qaeda terrorists who attacked us on Sept. 11, 2001, are now headquartered in Pakistan and are stronger than ever.

http://www.richardsonforpresident.com/newsroom/articles?id=0260
Continues at link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
4. "We cannot afford another president who is a foreign policy novice,"
Edited on Sat Jan-05-08 10:48 AM by MethuenProgressive
Richardson touts himself as tested leader
http://www.gazetteonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071229/IOWACAUCUS/652082445/1011/IOWACAUCUS

"...a Richardson administration would be marked by "negotiation and diplomacy, both domestically and overseas."
Calling the war in Iraq a quagmire, he said, "We need U.S. leadership to get the three sides in Iraq together and we need a UN peacekeeping force, made up of forces from the region, to keep the peace."

Richardson said he would get all American troops and contractors out of Iraq within one year.
Richardson also said he would negotiate with the Russians to eliminate at least half of each country's nuclear weapons.
During a morning speech in Des Moines, Richardson renewed his call for Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf to step down in the wake of the assassination of Pakistan opposition leader Benazir Bhutto and that a caretaker government should be put in place until free and fair elections can be held.

The New Mexico governor presented himself as a leader who has been tested in the international arena as a former U.N. ambassador and someone who has negotiated hostage releases in the world's political hot spots.
"We cannot afford another president who is a foreign policy novice," Richardson told about 200 people at the Des Moines Botanical Center. "We cannot afford another president who takes the easiest path rather than the right path; a president who makes wrong choices because he doesn't know how to make the hard but right choices."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
5. Bill Richardson on Gay Rights
All most people know about Bill on GLBT Rights is that one line.
Here's the whole story:
http://www.issues2000.org/2008/Bill_Richardson_Civil_Rights.htm

Bill Richardson on Civil Rights
Democratic Governor (NM)

Won't accept honorary chair of Boy Scouts due to gay issue
Q If you're president of the United States you're automatically honorary chairman of the Boy Scouts of America. In light of that organization's position on sexual orientation, would you accept that position?
A: No, I wouldn't. Because I think, as president, I would commit myself, number one, that I will be a leader that prevents discrimination on the basis of race, gender and sexual orientation.

Source: 2007 Democratic primary debate at Dartmouth College Sep 6, 2007

Focus on achievable civil unions as a path to full inclusion
Q: In response to a question on same sex marriage at the CNN-YouTube debate, you said you would focus less on marriage and more on what's "achievable" in terms of rights and responsibilities for same sex couples. When will same sex marriage be achievable
A: The nation, I believe, is on a path to full inclusion. A president must lead that effort. In my judgment, what is achievable is civil unions with full marriage rights, with domestic partnership. I believe that's achievable.

Source: 2007 HRC/LOGO debate on gay issues Aug 9, 2007

Voted for DOMA, but now regrets vote; repeal it
Q: In 1996 why did you vote for DOMA?
A: I was the chief deputy Democratic whip at the time, and Clinton was president. The objective in passing DOMA was to fight a huge assault for a constitutional amendment in the Congress to ban gay marriage. It was sort of a cheap political way to decimate a bad initiative. I would repeal that horrendous initiative that I voted for and I regret now. DOMA would preclude a number of the full partnership rights that I want to see with civil unions.

Source: 2007 HRC/LOGO debate on gay issues Aug 9, 2007

Included transgender in hate-crimes law
Look at what Bill Richardson as governor has done.
I passed a hate crimes act that was based on non-discrimination I was the first governor to include transgender.
I also passed domestic partnerships avoiding discrimination. I'm the only governor that called a special session to expand domestic partnership.
I've appointed Cabinet members that are gay and lesbians. All through my administration I have been inclusive of the lesbian/gay community.
Source: 2007 HRC/LOGO debate on gay issues Aug 9, 2007

Apologizes for "maricon" comment; but look at the record
Q: As a guest on the Don Imus show, "Imus in the Morning", in March 2006, you were asked by Imus in a gag if a staffer was a "maricon," which is Spanish for "faggot." In your response, you repeated the epithet. But you've since apologized and now you question the timing of this issue coming up. Do you not believe that you should be held accountable for repeating that word?
A: Sure, you know, and I'm Hispanic. I felt the sting as a kid of being stereotyped. And I apologized but I meant no harm when I said that. It was, you know, one of those exchanges that I was caught off guard. No, I am not backing off. I apologize, but I think you should look at my actions and not words. Let me tell you what I've done as governor. You can talk about what mistakes people have made. I've made plenty. And I've probably said things that I regret across the board. But we should look at what we've done. I accept obviously -- but you should look at my record. Action speaks louder than words.

Source: 2007 HRC/LOGO debate on gay issues Aug 9, 2007

The country isn't there yet on gay marriage
Q: You said you're calling a special session for domestic partnerships in NM....
A: No. I did .

Q: Oh, you did. And how did it go?

A: It didn't pass. We lost by one vote.

Q: So you didn't call a special session for same sex marriage because you can't get domestic partnership through. If the New Mexico legislature handed you a marriage bill, would you sign it?

A: I am pushing the NM legislature very hard to expand domestic partnership. It's a question of going through a path that is achievable.

Q: If the legislature hands you that piece of legislation, in your heart, where are you on that issue?

A: Well, you know, in my heart, I'm doing what is achievable. And I'm not there yet. And the country isn't there yet. New Mexico isn't there yet. We have to bring the country on. We have to move in the direction of making this happen. That doesn't mean that I'm closed on this issue. It means that you do what is achievable.

Source: 2007 HRC/LOGO debate on gay issues Aug 9, 2007

Homosexuality is a choice, but it's not an issue of science
Q: Do you think homosexuality is a choice, or is it biological?
A: It's a choice.

Q: I don't know if you understand the question. Do you think a homosexual is born that way, or do you think that around seventh grade we go, "Ooh, I want to be gay"?

A: Well, I'm not a scientist. I don't see this as an issue of science or definition. I see gays and lesbians as people as a matter of human decency. I don't like to categorize people. I don't like to answer definitions like that, that perhaps are grounded in science or something else that I don't understand.

Q: Well, it's hard when you are a citizen of a country that tells you that you are making a choice when you were born that way.

A: As a Hispanic, I grew up with people thinking because of my darker skin and because I wasn't fully speaking English at a time, that I was not equal. So I understand that issue of inequality, and so across the board I've always felt that every human being desires the same rights.

Source: 2007 HRC/LOGO debate on gay issues Aug 9, 2007

Full civil unions with full marriage rights
Q: Would you allow us, , to be married to each other?
KUCINICH: Yes. Gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender should have the same rights as anyone else, including a civil marriage ceremony.

Q: : You supported the Defense of Marriage Act.

DODD: ought to have civil unions. But I believe marriage is between a man and a woman.

RICHARDSON: I would do what is achievable. What I think is achievable is full civil unions with full marriage rights. I would also press for a hate crimes act in the Congress. I would eliminate "don't ask/don't tell" in the military. If we're going to have in our military men & women that die for this country, we shouldn't give them a lecture on their sexual orientation I would push for domestic partnership laws, nondiscrimination in insurance and housing. I would also send a very strong message that, in my administration, I will not tolerate any discrimination on the basis of race, gender, or sexual orientation.

Source: 2007 YouTube Democratic Primary debate, Charleston SC Jul 23, 2007

Diversity isn't just talking points; it's facts of life
Q: Is race still the most intractable issue in America?
A: Leading on the issues of race is about being authentic, about speaking honestly. Race is a major issue in this country, and the next president has to talk about it. Race is not just passing new laws. Race is not just naming solid Supreme Court justices. Race is also dealing with bigotry and racism that exists in this country.

And I believe very strongly that the next president is not just going to have to pass laws and take the steps necessary to reaffirm affirmative action and take steps to make sure that our schools are integrated, but also the next president is going have to lead and speak passionately about a dialogue among all people.

And I believe very strongly that issues of diversity, for me, the first Latino to run for president, aren't talking points; they're facts of life.

Source: 2007 Democratic Primary Debate at Howard University Jun 28, 2007

For hate crimes law, domestic partnerships, civil unions
Here's what I would do. I would do what I did as governor of New Mexico. One, I would move in the Congress for a hate crimes law. I would have domestic partnerships. I would have civil unions. I would initiate laws that practice non-discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. I would get rid of "don't ask, don't tell." I voted against it as a congressman.
Source: 2007 Dem. debate at Saint Anselm College Jun 3, 2007

Let gay and lesbian servicemembers serve openly
In Richardson's first term as Governor, he threatened to veto a New Mexico DOMA-type law, unless it was enacted alongside civil unions. (It was never necessary.) He is also for letting gay and lesbian servicemembers serve openly in our Armed Forces, and said so during the "Don't Ask/Don't Tell" debates in the 90's. He extended civil rights laws to homosexuals and transgendered people while Governor of New Mexico.
Source: Campaign blog www.BillRichardsonBlog.com Jan 28, 2007

Added sexual orientation & gender identity as NM civil right
You don't get better than Richardson on gay issues, and again he's not just talking the talk; he's walked the walk. In his first term as governor, he led the state from nowhere to being ranked among the best in the nation on gay rights protections:
He signed legislation expanding New Mexico civil rights laws to include sexual orientation and gender identity (which only 3 other states included).
He signed a hate crimes law that included actual or perceived sexual orientation and gender identity.
He signed an executive order in 2003 extending health insurance and other benefits to the same-sex domestic partners of NM state employees.
He's on record backing full-fledged civil unions and opposes state-level constitutional amendments banning gays from marrying.
While in Congress, Richardson backed military service for out gay men and lesbians. That means he was anti-Don't Ask, Don't Tell when it was very uncool to be.
Source: CitizenChris blog on TypePad.com Jan 21, 2007

Defeated DOMA in NM by tying it to civil union legislation
Richardson's negotiation savvy the difficult issue of marriage equality for same-sex couples. Richardson opposes gay marriage, but when the New Mexico legislature began pushing a "Defense of Marriage Act" in 2005, Richardson said he would veto it unless the DOMA was enacted alongside civil union legislation. Richardson's position wasn't just expedient, it was fairly principled and would satisfy any but those with a gay marriage litmus test. The DOMA effort failed.
Source: CitizenChris blog on TypePad.com Jan 21, 2007

Voted for federal Defense of Marriage Act in 1996
Richardson's record isn't unblemished. He voted for the Defense of Marriage Act in 1996, and I couldn't find any statement since recanting that support. Even with such an impressive record on other gay issues, Richardson will need to explain his position on DOMA to gay Democrats.
Source: CitizenChris blog on TypePad.com Jan 21, 2007
----------

Bill Richardson '08! x Clark x Kerry x Gore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
6. NH Primary Eve kick!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC