Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Several Courageous Votes For Kerry, Not So Courageous For Edwards

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 07:07 PM
Original message
Several Courageous Votes For Kerry, Not So Courageous For Edwards
For people who doubt Kerry's progressive credentials, he is remarkably in line with the very-progressive Public Citizen (founded by Nader).

Here's his voting record there:

http://action.citizen.org/pc/officials/congress/?lvl=C&only_votes=1&azip=02101

His only blight is supporting Fast Track, but that is all-but negated by the Kerry Amendment that Public Citizen vigorously supported.

http://www.citizen.org/pressroom/release.cfm?ID=1112

Kerry often put his neck on the line to promote many progressive issues, but he was not always followed by his Southern colleague:

Energy: Subsidized Insurance for Nuclear Power Plants

Agreed to: 78-21
Edwards: Yea
Kerry: Nay

This vote was on an amendment offered by Sen. George Voinovich to the Senate energy bill, which would reauthorize the Price-Anderson Act. Price-Anderson provides an unfair taxpayer subsidy to nuclear plant operators by limiting their liability to the public in the event of a nuclear accident. This mitigates the industry’s investment risk and dramatically reduces the cost of retaining liability insurance. Estimates of the value of the annual subsidy range from $366 million to $3.4 billion.

http://action.citizen.org/pc/issues/votes/?votenum=42&chamber=S&congress=1072

Increasing Reliance on Renewable Energy

Rejected: 29-70
Edwards: Nay
Kerry: Yea

A groundbreaking renewable energy portfolio standard - in which Congress would set concrete goals to increase America's reliance on wind and solar energy - was rejected. Amendment 3017, sponsored by Sen. Jeffords, would have mandated that 20% of America's electricity be generated from renewable energy like wind and solar by the year 2020.

http://action.citizen.org/pc/issues/votes/?votenum=50&chamber=S&congress=1072

Consumer Bankruptcies

Passed: 83-15
Edwards: Yea
Kerry: Nay

This vote was on final passage of an overhaul of bankruptcy law. It would place more restrictions on Americans who file for bankruptcy. The bill would mean more legal and paperwork burdens for lower-income families while creditors gain more opportunities to file lawsuits against borrowers. Also, this dream bill for banks and credit card companies does not require loaners to provide information about how long it would take to pay off the credit balances and what borrowers’ total costs would be if they made minimum payments on their debts.

http://action.citizen.org/pc/issues/votes/?votenum=36&chamber=S&congress=1071

Energy: Yucca Mountain Nuclear Waste Site

Agreed to: 60-39
Edwards: Yea
Kerry: Nay

This vote was on whether to override the state of Nevada’s veto and approve the Yucca Mountain nuclear dump (S.J.R. 34), despite broad-based opposition from environmental and public interest organizations. The Department of Energy’s recommendation of the Yucca Mountain site has been plagued by compromised research and numerous safety issues. Far from solving the nuclear waste problem, sending waste to Yucca Mountain would require tens of thousands of radioactive shipments through communities in 44 states.

http://action.citizen.org/pc/issues/votes/?votenum=167&chamber=S&congress=1072


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. How about the four or five trade bills on which Edwards NO/Kerry YES?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Nice defense of Edward's backwards votes presented by Dr. Funk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Like Fast Track?
Don't worry. I'm getting to that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
molly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. You go guy!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. H.R. 3009, the fast track bill, Andean Trade; Edwards voted for it.
Edited on Tue Feb-24-04 07:23 PM by flpoljunkie
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=107&session=2&vote=00130

A bill to extend the Andean Trade Preference Act, to grant additional trade benefits under that Act, and for other purposes.

(Other purposes, includes the fast track provision.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. It Was Actually Nader Who Let Me On To Price-Anderson
In "The Nader Reader" (yes, I read the whole friggin' thing, and loved every word of it).

http://images.amazon.com/images/P/1583220577.01._PE_PIdp-schmoo2,TopRight,7,-26_SCMZZZZZZZ_.jpg

"Estimates of the value of the annual subsidy range from $366 million to $3.4 billion."

Price-Anderson limits the insurance that nuclear plants have to pay (which is why they aren't shut down for expenses). Although a meltdown - or attack - could easily do billions upon billions in damage, the are only responsible for a few million.

It is an outrage, and it makes me proud that Kerry took the principled, progressive stand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. Kerry: better on environment/social; Edwards: better on trade/economics nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Kerry and Edward hold very similar views on trades issues as candidates...
This is a fact. Both would review existing trade treaties to add worker and environmental protections and insist these be a part of any new treaties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC