Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Iowa caucuses discourage participation by many voters

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
CGowen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 11:08 AM
Original message
Iowa caucuses discourage participation by many voters

By Jodi Kantor
Published: January 1, 2008

DES MOINES, Iowa: Jason Huffman has lived in Iowa his whole life. Lately he has been watching presidential debates on the Internet and discussing what he sees with friends and relatives. But when fellow Iowans choose their presidential nominees Thursday night, he will not be able to vote, because he is serving with the Iowa National Guard in western Afghanistan.

"Shouldn't we at least have as much influence in this as any other citizen?" Huffman wrote in an e-mail message.

He is far from the only Iowan who will be unable to participate.

Because the caucuses, held in the early evening, do not allow absentee voting, they tend to leave out nearly entire categories of voters: the infirm, soldiers on active duty, restaurant employees on the dinner shift, medical personnel who cannot leave their patients, parents who do not have babysitting and many others who work in retail, at gasoline stations and in other jobs that require evening duty.

As in years past, voters must present themselves in person, at a specific hour, and stay for as long as two. And if this caucus is anything like prior ones, only a tiny percentage of Iowans will participate. In 2000, the last year in which both parties held caucuses, 59,000 Democrats and 87,000 Republicans voted, in a state with 2.9 million people. In 2004, 124,000 people turned out for the Democratic caucuses.

....

http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/01/01/america/vote.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. yes, indeed. This type of voting is Exclusionary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU9598 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. We are picking a nominee, not ordering a latte
God forbid it should take some time and effort for people in the state.

While it is unfair that out of state Iowa Democratic party members cannot vote absentee (especially men and women serving in the military), that unfairness could be easily fixed by a party rule. It is not a reason to dismantle a long held, party building effort.

For those who say it is too inconvenient to spend and hour and a half organizing the party and choosing our next president ... perhaps it is best you just stay home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC