Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who are the Democratic bigots?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Onlooker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 09:34 AM
Original message
Who are the Democratic bigots?
Let's face it, there are some Americans who believe a black person or woman can't win the presidency. There are some who probably believe it would not be good for the country if such a person won. Who are these Democrats? My guess is they are mostly moderate and conservative ones. While ultimately any Democratic nominee will be able to count on the liberals to support them in the general election, in order for Obama or Clinton to win the nomination, they must appeal to those who are nervous about their race or gender. As a result, they are more focused on reaching moderates than liberals.

Edwards, as a white male, has the luxury of forsaking his actual voting record (which is no better than Obama's and hardly better than Hillary's) and reaching out to the liberals, knowing full well that many of the others will naturally gravitate towards him. In effect, Edwards is benefiting from institutionalized racism and sexism. That doesn't make him bad. It makes him smart. But, we should also keep in mind how our nation's prejudices are influencing the election and attempting to preserve the shameful 230-year-old legacy of white male rule. What's sad is that many liberals don't seem to understand the need for affirmative action in this primary season.

Go Obama! Go Clinton!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. What does "affirmative action in the primary season" mean?
Edited on Thu Jan-03-08 09:37 AM by Bleachers7
This is milder than your last rant. I just don't get it. Obama is black. That's obvious. Did you know Obama is the only black senator? Did you know that Obama got elected as a senator in the US with his name and race plainly obvious? If he can be elected senator, he can be elected president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigscott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. i agree with most of your post
but BHO getting elected as a Senator in a very blue state is easier than getting elected President in a very polarized country
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Czolgosz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. Who are the Democratic bigots? Obama! Oh, were we not supposed to consider Donnie McClurkin?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Onlooker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. You must be joking
He was obviously wrong by including Donnie McClurkin but that no more reflects on his whole view about gays than Hillary being married to the man who implemented Don't-Ask-Don't-Tell or Edwards refusing to be a cosponsor of gay hate crimes and civil rights legislation when he was a senator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yeah because each of the others you named PURPOSEFULLY hired a bigot to headline their event
and gave said bigot a microphone and a stage to spew homophobic filth to a receptive audience of like-minded bigots. Er, wait a minute...

What's more reflective on Saint Obama's "whole view" on civil rights for the LGBT community? His lofty words or his action in welcoming an "ex-gay" clown to MC his campaign event in S.C. just to win some religious bigots' votes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Czolgosz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. If Hillary's campaign invited participation from an "ex-African American" who claimed to be "cured"
by bleaching his skin white and straightening his hair, you wouldn't question who was the biggest bigot.

Maybe you want to look at your own views if you don't understand this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Onlooker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Why is embracing a homophobic black gospel singer ...
... any different than embracing the homophobic Catholic church?

How should the candidates handle religious Catholics in their campaigns, or is your concern limited only to specific religions?

Like I said, I think Obama was wrong on this, but I don't see it as many more serious than mistakes that Edwards or Clinton have made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
5. I no longer think bigotry is a liberal/moderate thing...
I think it's insidious, pervasive, and at least for sexism, widely acceptable. I have seen the most unthinking rightwing parroting here from supposedly liberal people. It's been a real eye-opener.

I think people who self-identify as liberals (if only because they're anti-war, assuming anybody here is pro-war) are fully capable of repeating old assumptions and memes with the apparent belief that they're sharp, original and insightful bits of critical thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
8. one was banned from here last night
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
9. You seem to be suggesting anyone who doesn't support Obama or Clinton is bigoted.
Thank you for posting that. Now I can safely ignore you knowing you have nothing of substance to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy823 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. I am with you
This "crap" that anyone who isn't for Obama, or Clinton is a racist, bigot, or sexist, is getting so lame! Can't they accept that people may not like those two because they just simply aren't what this country needs right now? That maybe they won't vote for them because they feel that they are in the pockets of "corporate" America? Or that they just don't have good plans to make the changes we need in this country?

Nobody should vote, or not vote, simply because of a persons race or gender. It is the "issues" we need to be looking at, and getting someone in who will address those issues!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Onlooker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. That's not what I said at all
I said that there are bigots in the ranks of moderates and conservative Democrats, and to some degree Obama and Clinton have to address their concerns. They have no choice if they want to win. Edwards doesn't have that obstacle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. I think that was the gist of the OP. Sounds like dribble convoluted thinking at best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
13. You set up a transparent straw man argument right from the beginning.
Believing that a black person or a woman cannot win the Presidency in a nation that is largely comprised of conservative bigots does not make somebody a bigot.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Onlooker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. But it makes them part of the problem n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. This may or may not be true. But it does not make them bigots. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midlife_mo_Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
16. How does that make Edwards smart?
Being smart is using your brain to affect the outcome of the race. How is Edwards being white doing that?

Edwards can't change the color of his skin anymore than Obama can change his, or Hillary can change her gender. He just is who he is.

And I see no need for affirmative action in this primary season. Edwards is my first choice. Obama is my second. (Actually, if Biden is on the ballot by the time I vote, he'd be in strong contention for my vote.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 03:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC