Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should Obama withdraw if he got third place?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 06:18 PM
Original message
Should Obama withdraw if he got third place?
I saw a suggestion in another thread that Obama should drop out if he only manages a third place in Iowa. I believe this is a possible result, but I doubt he would withdraw in this case.

Obama seems to be collapsing if the latest polls are any indication. I think a third place would make Obama no longer a viable candidate.

Maybe that is the reason Obama is attacking everybody so much.

Disclaimer: I am not into predictions and of course Obama could still win in Iowa, anything is possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DemKR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. he'll spin it as if he were the victim of an attack
so i don't think he will. But I wish he would lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. He will stay in through SC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemKR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. he's counting o n the 'let it shine' evangelical crowd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avrdream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 06:38 PM
Original message
Yeah, the crowd that Donnie primed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. Nah, he's in it till Feb 5 at least. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. at least one of the top 3 are not going to make it to the top 3 in Iowa
my opinion of course, but i'm excited to see who the sleeper(s) is. :popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. Two words: You. Wish.
I don't think there will be a clear candidate after February 5th.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. Absolutely NOT. I'm split b/w him and Clinton but
I absolutely do not want Iowa determining sh1t this time around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy823 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. He won't
Even though his wife did say that if they lost Iowa, it was over!

I too think he will go on to at least SC, but by then if he hasn't come in first in NH and SC, he may change his mind. Of course a third in Iowa, and a loss in NH, may change things also, don't really know. :shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. Nope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
10. Unless the campaign thinks that, it's moot
My understanding of the Obama organization is that their fallback plan is to springboard off of a strong showing in South Carolina going into Super Tuesday; given that, why couldn't they recover, unless they're completely out of money or something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. There are outside forces
that pressure candidates to withdraw at some point. But I agree with your conclusion in this case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. No, but he should withdraw after he wins New Hampshire
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. .
;-) :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
12. No!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. lol at your sig line
I can understand the feeling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lurking Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
13. Nope.
No one should until after Super Tuesday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BringBigDogBack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
14. No
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
15. Absolutely not. He will be an an excellent postioin to win NH regardless.
Long, long way to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
19. Let's Show Some Respect
~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
20. No drop out. Iowa doesn't mean that much. Almost irrelevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
21. Why would he want to do that? To support the "inevitability" meme?
We have THREE viable top candidates. Let them get on with it over as many state primaries as possible.

Hekate

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MalloyLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
22. yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
23. No. Hillary should. Just as Edwards should if he doesn't WIN in Iowa.
Edited on Mon Dec-31-07 07:23 PM by jenmito
But of course Hillary won't. And neither will Obama. They both have enough money to hang in there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy823 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Money
Won't to them any good if the people don't vote for them. I know it's not easy to understand for some, but money will not win the race, the candidate wins the race. If we let the money decide who wins, then cororate America will be the "only" winner! Why do you think Clinton and Obama have gotten so much money from big corporations? It sure isn't because they are going to "change" things in D.C.!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Edwards TRIED to raise as much money as Obama and Hillary...
he only "took a stand" once he realized he couldn't raise as much as he had hoped. Don't let him fool you. And Obama has more donors who gave small donations than any of the others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
24. No, of course not
Just like I wouldn't expect Edwards or Hillary to bow out if they come in 3rd, especially since New Hampshire is just a few days afterwards.

I'd expect the current top three to stay on through super Tuesday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
25. Yes. Please.
No, not really. There are 49 other states, and plenty of delegates and votes left to earn.

It's just wishful thinking on my part. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 04:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC