Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MSNBC/McClatchy: Hillary's Unfavorables Higher than Edwards or Obama

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 01:22 PM
Original message
MSNBC/McClatchy: Hillary's Unfavorables Higher than Edwards or Obama

Rec Favorable Rec Unfavorable Rec Neutral

John Edwards 73% 11% 16% -
Barack Obama 66% 12% 22% -
Hillary Clinton 59% 19% 22%

http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/sections/news/071230_Dem_MSNBC_Mason_Dixon_Iowa_Poll.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. I love facts!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes, me too. Kind of hard to find around here today, huh? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KennedyGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Smear..smear..
how can you post such trash..
Oh..its not anti-O? ...Truth....Fact....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. 1) This is not my thread
and 2)Those are poll numbers, not a freakin' smear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. oops ... maybe not so fast?
In Rasmussen's newly reported as of 12/31 favorable/unfavorable polling, here are the figures in the article:

EDWARDS: 49/42
CLINTON: 48/50
OBAMA: 43/51

McCAIN: 53/37
GIULIANI: 40/55
ROMNEY: 38/51

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/favorables/election_2008_democratic_candidates_running_in_2008_presidential_election
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. these are generally all over the place and change once the
candidate is chosen. It has historically been worthless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. But your fellow HRC supporters are throwing all sorts of numbers around..
are they worthless, too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. that is what the experts say: that those numbers change
just as they did when Bush had greater negatives than Kerry and Gore.

Dean had lower negatives than others, and still lost. They are meaningless.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KennedyGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. This place is more fun than a comedy club (heh)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. Here's another Factoid: Hillary ranks third in 2nd Choice polling
From same Poll.. follow link above:

(IF “BACK OTHER") QUESTION:
Which candidate would become your second choice?
Edwards 36%
Obama 25%
Clinton 11%
Richardson 11%
Biden 8%
Dodd 1%
Kucinich 1%
Gravel -
Not Sure 7%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. sh-t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
9. 19% to 12% to 11% w/ a 5% MOE Oooooo! Earth shaking!!
No real diff between them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hayu_lol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Gawd, the earth will tip on it's axis...
no real news here, just another slimeball slam. Next?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. MSNBC/McClatchy: Edwards & Obama's Unfavorables Higher than Hillarys!
When you add them up.
Numbers is fun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
12. the whole poll is pretty wild...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThatPoetGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
16. So...
the MSNBC/McClatchy poll shows John Edwards with the highest favorable rating and the lowest unfavorable rating.

The Rasmussen poll shows John Edwards with the highest favorable rating and the lowest unfavorable rating.

The MSNBC/McClatchy poll also shows John Edwards as the favorite second choice.

Interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Yes, that about sums it up :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
18. These are important numbers.
I am a Kucinich supporter (for years), but could throw my support behing Edwards as a compromise Unity candidate.

He is clearly the most electable in the GE.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC