Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BBC Censored Benazir Bhutto's Reports that Bin Laden Had Been Murdered

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 05:09 PM
Original message
BBC Censored Benazir Bhutto's Reports that Bin Laden Had Been Murdered



http://existentialistcowboy.blogspot.com/2007/12/bbc-censored-benazir-bhuttos-reports.html


Sunday, December 30, 2007
BBC Censored Benazir Bhutto's Reports that Bin Laden Had Been Murdered

When a news organization as venerable as the BBC censors the reportage of a story as important as the assassination of Benzir Bhutto --a highly visible critic of Bush/British policy with regard to the "War on Terrorism" et al --it is fair to ask: who is the BBC protecting? Are they covering up the motive for her murder? Are they protecting the regimes that engineered her assassination?

Here is the original, unedited version in which Bhutto states that Bin Laden had been murdered.

Here is the BBC's Censored version.

Bhutto herself has exposed a motive for her murder. Solving the case is a matter of finding the gunmen whom Hilary Clinton thinks may be found found among Pakistani troops.

CLINTON, Iowa - Hillary Rodham Clinton waded into Pakistan's volatile internal political situation yesterday, raising the possibility the country's military might have assassinated Benazir Bhutto because the killing took place in the garrison city of Rawalpindi.

Clinton's remarks came as Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf's government seemed to reject a call for an independent international investigation of the murder that Clinton and John Edwards proposed on Friday................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. I wondered the same thing, when I saw that.
Edited on Sun Dec-30-07 05:17 PM by Fridays Child
Was she murdered for exposing the assassination of bin Laden?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Why? Who cares?
His people aren't complaining about it. Ours aren't. He's as useful a propaganda tool for both sides dead or alive, apparently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. We can't be the only people who have seen that video -- but nobody in the
media, our candidates, whatever, acknowledges it in any way. :shrug:

But regardless of whether he himself is dead or alive, we're still confronted with like-minded people intent on jihad.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
postulater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. It seems like if BinLaden was dead and she knew about it
then others would know also and there would be more publicity about the death. As it is there has been very little even on the internets about him being dead and certainly not much hard evidence.

So unless she had some real evidence I don't think it is enough of a threat to kill her for. Her claims could be easily ignored.

There's probably other reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. The fact that the city was a garrison city has been mentioned before.
Bhutto said it. She said that they should have no trouble protecting her because of the resources there are in this garrison city.

There needs to be an independent investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. How cleverly you have seized upon the least relevant detail.
I'm guessing you find the National Treasure movies plausible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC