Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WaPo: Edwards Fights to the Finish

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 03:07 PM
Original message
WaPo: Edwards Fights to the Finish
By Dan Balz
DES MOINES -- For the final days in the Iowa contest, John Edwards has shed his blue jeans and open-collar shirt and put on a suit and tie -- and a pair of brass knuckles.

Often the forgotten man in Iowa's three-way Democratic battle, Edwards is on the move. Independent analysts see his support firming up. Advisers to both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama believe he might win the caucuses on Thursday -- although their views should be discounted because both Clinton and Obama would rather see Edwards win if they can't.

Four years ago, Edwards closed out Iowa in a rush. Had the campaign gone on a few more days, he might have won the caucuses. His second-place finish was almost as surprising as John Kerry's victory.

Nobody in the race here understands the rhythms of campaigns any better than Edwards and nobody is more ruthlessly focused on closing the deal than the former trial lawyer and senator. This time he's trying to make it all the way, knowing that he cannot afford to lose here on Thursday night.
But it is his message that is most remarkable. No thought here of finishing on a sunny and positive note, as he did four years ago. His "America Rising" theme is not a variation of "Morning in America."

It is a call to arms that is raw and angry, populist and pugnacious. It is a message that is as exhausting and is it confrontational. It is a message makes Al Gore's "people versus the powerful" seem tame and timid in comparison.

One Edwards supporter, departing after a big rally in Des Moines on Saturday night, said he hasn't heard a message as passionate or strong since Bobby Kennedy's 1968 presidential campaign.


-snip-

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2007/12/30/edwards_fights_to_the_finish_1.html

*******

This is a message that makes the corporate reporters skittish (i.e. WaPo, Des Moines Register) - but the PEOPLE are loving it!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Theres some good news
Thanks for posting! Rec'd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good deal
The more I hear comparisons of Edwards to Bobby Kennedy, the happier I am. This summer I was reading Schlesinger's Robert Kennedy and His Times, though my vacation ended before I could finish it. What a man. What a time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The River Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. "..ruthlessly focused"..?
Why can't they just say "focused"?
Why interject "ruthlessly".

The reporter is letting his bias show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snotcicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I'd like to be there the day they are handing out press passes after Edwards is elected
and watch these clowns waddle up with their tales between their legs leaving a pee pee trail to ask for a pass PLEEEASE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
weeve Donating Member (427 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yep
Yet another big media smear job on Edwards, in the guise of "unbiased" reporting. Their corporate interests are so threatened by John, that they're bending over backwards to make Edwards out to be the unhinged boogeyman. Or the Unabomber ...

"He promises not to fix the system but to blow it up."

They did the same to another populist, Howard Dean, when he started to gain traction with the wider public. Too angry ( the SCREAM ) ... too confrontational ... too willing to rock the boat, and not be a corporate Yes man/woman. He's going to BLOW IT UP, our beloved American system ! ( Sickening terminology, right after Bhutto's death. ) Dang, he's probably Al Quieda !

And then at the end of the article ( probably knowing that Edwards is likely to win Iowa ), they start in with the new spin that it's probably only those rural HICKS in Iowa who can be duped like this. So yeah ... they've got their marching orders. Now that IGNORING Edwards doesn't seem to be working, let's make him out to be the ANGRY unhinged candidate, too dangerous to lead the nation, and Iowa and their crazy, rural caucuses don't know a thing. It worked with Dean ... let's hope it doesn't work with Edwards, because this country needs him more than ever right now.

Go Iowa !! Go Edwards !!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. It won't work with Edwards. He's tested and ready and speaking from the heart.
I'd like to see him hold a weekly news conference to beat the bastards down!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChiciB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. My BIG Worry Is That THE MEDIA & D.C. Elites Will Do Almost Anything
to stop John Edwards. He's very inspiring and working his heart out for "we the people" as I see it!!

Go, Johnny, GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. My Mom (Des Moines) says her friends and neighbors
have been "galvanized" recently by the Edwards message. He's been moving a lot of people off the fence.

My mom plans initially to support Richardson in the caucus, but will do so mostly to help Richardson look good (in hopes of getting R considered as a potential VP running mate).

If, as is probable, Richardson fails to achieve "viability level," Mom will be throwing her caucus support enthusiastically to Edwards.

:popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
9. Edwards should be showing the John Sayle's film Matewan
and the documentary The Corporation as a campaign 'double feature'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
10. If Edwards doesn't get the nod, I want him as AG.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surfermaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
11. Edwards lost because of a half republican Wes. Clark
Some thought Clinton put him in to stop Edwards so Hillary could win in the next election...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laureloak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. It was a Clark supporter who coined "Breck girl".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
13. K&R. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC