Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The main reason to not nominate Hillary Clinton is...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Leo 9 Donating Member (560 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 06:16 PM
Original message
The main reason to not nominate Hillary Clinton is...
Behavioral Conditioning

Over the past 16 years the right wing media machine has dedicated millions of hours to conditioning the public to react negatively at the sound of her voice or the mention of her name.

We know it's not fair, but we all know it's true.

Why should we enter the race with such a handicap?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Some of you that are scared of the right wing media are pathethic. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. a good number of democrats and people here buy into it, so they fear AND side with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leo 9 Donating Member (560 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. The right wing media want her to be the nominee.
Rupert Murdoch Loves Hillary Clinton
Conservative Media Mogul To Host Fundraiser For Liberal N.Y. Senator

NEW YORK, May 9, 2006


Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., April 29, 2006, left and News Corporation Chairman and CEO Rupert Murdoch, June 18, 2003. (AP)

(CBS) To call them a political odd couple would be a rash understatement.

Conservative media mogul Rupert Murdoch will host a fundraiser for liberal New York Sen. Hillary Clinton, the Financial Times reports.

The mating ritual of the unlikely allies has been under way for months. Clinton set political tongues to wagging last month by attending a Washington party celebrating the 10th anniversary of Fox News, the cable news channel owned by Murdoch.

The Financial Times quoted one unnamed source as describing the Clinton-Murdoch connection in this way: "They have a respectful and cordial relationship. He has respect for the work she has done on behalf of New York. I wouldn't say it was illustrative of a close ongoing relationship. It is not like they are dining out together."

snip

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/05/09/politics/main1600694.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. ew, put a warning on that photo of that asshole murdoch. :D. dear murdoch, kick the bucket, thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. This by itself is more than enough to keep me from voting for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corkhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 06:02 AM
Response to Reply #3
31. I think it has been called "a vast right wing conspiracy". I don't remember who said that...
Insults will not get me to vote for your queen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leo 9 Donating Member (560 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Not scared, just aware of what has to be overcome.
I see no reason to make her the cause.

She's too much with them to be that.

Why not pick a new name, one they haven't spent so much time and treasure on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. yeah
I mean it's not like the MSM and the repugs aren't going to invest a ton of money digging around in a "new person's" history, right? And it's not like the scandals one finds -- or creates out of thin air -- with a "new person" won't get any attention or anything, right?

The difference between Hillary and a "new person" is the alleged scandals with Hillary will need to be dusted off in order to be resuscitated. And the public, much like they did during the 1990s, will collectively shrug their shoulders and go "big deal".

A "new person", though? Nice and new gossip to discuss endlessly on talk shows, around the water cooler and on the front page of the newspaper, above-the-fold in big, block letters. And, because they're "new", it gets even more attention because, I mean, he just looks so NICE! Who would have believed he'd do THAT?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leo 9 Donating Member (560 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. Why invade Pas de Calais, when Normandy would be so much more...
...unexpected?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #11
35. LIKE THIS>>
BARACK OBAMA'S CHURCH ..FROM WEBSITE.

THIS WILL BE AN ISSUE...



About Us

We are a congregation which is Unashamedly Black and Unapologetically Christian... Our roots in the Black religious experience and tradition are deep, lasting and permanent. We are an African people, and remain "true to our native land," the mother continent, the cradle of civilization. God has superintended our pilgrimage through the days of slavery, the days of segregation, and the long night of racism. It is God who gives us the strength and courage to continuously address injustice as a people, and as a congregation. We constantly affirm our trust in God through cultural expression of a Black worship service and ministries which address the Black Community

Mission

Mission Statement: What Trinity Is About

Trinity United Church of Christ has been called by God to be a congregation that is not ashamed of the gospel of Jesus Christ and that does not apologize for its African roots! As a congregation of baptized believers, we are called to be agents of liberation not only for the oppressed, but for all of God’s family. We, as a church family, acknowledge, that we will, building on this affirmation of "who we are" and "whose we are," call men, women, boys and girls to the liberating love of Jesus Christ, inviting them to become a part of the church universal, responding to Jesus’ command that we go into all the world and make disciples!

We are called out to be "a chosen people" that pays no attention to socio-economic or educational backgrounds. We are made up of the highly educated and the uneducated. Our congregation is a combination of the haves and the have-nots; the economically disadvantaged, the under-class, the unemployed and the employable.

The fortunate who are among us combine forces with the less fortunate to become agents of change for God who is not pleased with America’s economic mal-distribution!

W.E.B. DuBois indicated that the problem in the 20th century was going to be the problem of the color line. He was absolutely correct. Our job as servants of God is to address that problem and eradicate it in the name of Him who came for the whole world by calling all men, women, boys and girls to Christ.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leo 9 Donating Member (560 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. They'll make fun of Obama's name, bash him for admitting to...
...using drugs, imply he's a black muslim, and pander to white supremacy in general.

If that's all they got to use against him it will roll right off as it already has.

However, there's no way they can achive against anyone else the sort of negative conditioning they've got against Hillary Clinton before the 2008 election.

Did I mention she's also short?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hieronymus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
23. Why not fear the corporate media .. they run the country?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
25. You nailed it, cat_girl. It's amazing how these people simply let the right wing push them around
to the point that the RW dictates to them who they should run as their candidate. Hard to believe...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tactical Progressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
28. They only 'fear' winger media when it's Hillary
You can bet this attitude will completely reverse itself should their Great Leader go up against them.

Same as everything else about Baracks little moonies - they only understand things from the perspective that they want, from his vast inexperience, to the IWR, to his primary campaign of smears and lies against Dems.

Hillary isn't scared of the right wing media; neither should any Dem be. The only thing any Dem should be scared of at this moment is Dems getting conned into supporting a punk like Obama to represent them. That's something they have control over too, so there won't be any excuse for it happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. Obama is not that bad.
I wouldn't call him a punk. Don't stoop to their level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VarnettaTuckpocket Donating Member (559 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 06:56 AM
Response to Reply #29
33. Anyone who tells me my enemies are "good, moral, and decent" is definitely that bad n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leo 9 Donating Member (560 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #28
40. "a punk like Obama"?
Talk about behavioral conditioning to create dislike on an personal irrational subconscious level. :spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm not going to let some RW f*** tell me who to vote for. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. Sounds Pavlovian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leo 9 Donating Member (560 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Much of what they do is that.
Edited on Sat Dec-29-07 07:24 PM by Leo 9
They put much more energy into making fun of someone's name or appearance or sound of their voice or some other assigned personal defect than they ever put into talking about their issues or ideas.

The behavioral conditioning can be something as simple as making a rude noise whenever they say someone's name.

It works.

Soon you can't hear their name without also hearing that rude noise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kucinich4America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. That's not the only "conditioning" that has been taking place the last two decades
You're also being conditioned to accept extremist right wing positions as "moderate centrism".

Republicans like Eisenhower and even Goldwater would look like liberals compared to the DLC, yet we are told to accept them as "Democrats".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
12. The main reason not to
nominate hillary is that she's a bushite enabler and will continue to feed the military complex's War Machine. She's a dlc "corporatations first", and The People better look sharp cause they need more fodder to satiate that corporate greed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leo 9 Donating Member (560 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. We want someone who can defeat the dictatorship,
not pander to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. A Leader as it were, Leo,
from one Leo to another:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
13. I would love her to become President just to see Rush, Bill O's and Sean's faces.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Not good
enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Are you kidding? They'd be ECSTATIC!
Just think what it would do to their ratings for the next 4 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. True dat. n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
16. I, for one, believe she's earned her reputation...
and should not be elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. Leave it to rateyes to
get to the heart of the matter. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. I do my best.
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rageneau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
18. Because all the 'right' people hate Hillary.
Stuck-up, Ivy-League overachiever.

Who the hell does she think she is?

I've decided I'm gonna not like her before she gets a chance to not like me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leo 9 Donating Member (560 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #18
41. You forgot to mention that she's also short.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
26. Do you always let the right wing dictate to you who your candidate should be?
Good gawd, show some guts and stop letting the other side push you around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leo 9 Donating Member (560 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #26
42. I see no reason to show my guts by going through where the enemy
has been placing most of their defenses for the past 16 years for the sake of one person who didn't have that much likability or charisma to begin with.

I'd rather go around all that with someone more able to win over public support.

I'll support which ever nominee is chosen, but until then I might as well raise a fuss about an obvious handicap that no critic in this thread has even attempted to deny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
27. trust me, there are far better arguments for not electing Clinton than the media.
Edited on Sat Dec-29-07 11:42 PM by loveangelc
too many to name right now..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elana i am Donating Member (626 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 02:18 AM
Response to Original message
30. she comes with a bill.
i don't like her and i don't trust her, but what's more i LOATHE her husband.

no more clintons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leo 9 Donating Member (560 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #30
44. Well now I wouldn't say that.
I like them both as far as it goes.

I'd just like someone with more likability and charisma to be our presidential candidate.

Bill's got it.

Hillary doesn't.

In spite of their 16 years of trying to get people to personally dislike him, polls show most people still love Bill Clinton.

The polls do not say the same about Hillary Clinton.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
32. And you call the Democrats in Congress cowards?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
34. Certainly a valid point
Particularly since she's managed to alienate so many of those would would otherwise be her base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Countdown_3_2_1 Donating Member (778 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
36. She Can't Answer Questions Either.
She comes across as evasive, deliberately vague, scripted.
Obama and Edwards easily answer tough questions.
If Hillary cries and complains about a tough primary, what is she going to do against the GOP attack machine...pout?

The old gal is out of her league. Time for her to retire and let more competent people run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
37. Behavioral Conditioning may be one reason to avoid Hillary,
but the MAIN reason is that Americans who Work for a Living could not survive another DLC presidency.






"There are forces within the Democratic Party who want us to sound like kinder, gentler Republicans. I want us to compete for that great mass of voters that want a party that will stand up for working Americans, family farmers, and people who haven't felt the benefits of the economic upturn."---Paul Wellstone

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
39. The main reason to not nominate Hillary Clinton is...
because she is too closely aligned with corporations working against the best interests of America and 'we the people.'

That a huge percentage of people have an automatic negative knee jerk response to HRC is another problem. Uphill battle.

I like her fine, but I don't want her to be President. She should keep working in the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
43. TMTC (too many to count)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC