Ignore them... they will go away

[Kimber Scott]

It's important we Democrats not contribute to the "Free Publicity for Ralph Nader Fund" by participating in a dogfight with Nader and his supporters. The more the feathers fly, the more the media will be on it. That means more air time for Ralph and less time for us.

Go Dems!

:kick:

[Maddy McCall]

1. Yep..ignore Nader supporters and non-ABBers

I think they support both stances merely for attention here.

[mmonk]

2. Yes

if he is ignored by our candidates and party spokespersons, eventually the media will too.

[deminflorida]

3. Why are they being allowed to spray they're poison here on this

board????

"If you wish to contribute to the defeat of the Democratic candidate for president, then you are welcome to use someone else's bandwidth on some other website. As the election season draws closer, we may expand this rule to include Democratic candidates for other political offices.

Democratic Underground may not be used for political organizing activity by supporters of any political party other than the Democratic party. Supporters of certain other political parties may use Democratic Underground for limited partisan activities in political races where there is no Democratic party candidate."

Trying to sell your justification for voting on a third party progressive ticket is paramount to organizing opposition to the Democratic Party Candidate.

[donco6]

4. I've been posting the same thing for two days.

Guess it doesn't matter.

[Kimber Scott]

9. It matters

I didn't mean to be redundant. Just didn't see your posts. Besides, this will need to be repeated, a lot!

Hopefully, we'll all be able to calm down over this Nader stuff and get him off the air.

On Edit: This is actually a reply to #3.

[donco6]

21. Oh no! I'm very glad to see your post

Don't take me the wrong way - we do need to get this message out. I was just feeling like the rules suddenly didn't seem to matter.

[incapsulated]

5. Aren't those..

The "after the nominee has been chosen" rules?

[deminflorida]

6. Nader is NOT part of the Democratic Party nomination process

just like BUSH is not part of the Democratic Party nomination process...

So we let Bush people in now to promote their candidate????

[incapsulated]

8. My point is

That Skinner isn't going to impose this rule until a Democratic nominee is chosen.

Until then, we just have to suffer the little Naderites.

[Forkboy]

7. Well,there's no better way to ignore them

than by starting the 8,000th thread about them :eyes:

[unfrigginreal]

10. Has there been even one "I support Nader" thread?

I don't remember seeing any.

[Forkboy]

15. Not a one

people keep bitching about all the Nader threads,and just to prove how angry they are they start another :eyes:

[MaryBear]

11. Nader has some good things to say,

and they can't be said too often by too many. What I wonder is why he is not teamed up with Kucinich; or is he?

[kher-heb]

12. why are all the fascist threads screaming for obedience

started by Clarkies?

[Kimber Scott]

14. I'm a facist for making a suggestion?

Get a grip. Some people just have to follow the losing side. Other people let go and move on. ABB.

[RichM]

16. Aha! A most intriguing question!

Just a complete coincidence, no doubt. ;-)

[Forkboy]

17. You notice that too huh

most Clark supporters have had a ,er,military way about themselves.

[jonnyblitz]

18. I noticed it. n/t

[Tinoire]

19. It's democracy. Axciom-style.

Revealing isn't it?

[Name removed]

13. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[Kimber Scott]

20. Well let's just change this to the Nader Underground

That should help you all out, eh?