Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Iowa caucus 101-makes me dizzy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
unapatriciated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 10:47 AM
Original message
Iowa caucus 101-makes me dizzy
saw this on buzzflash sounds like the process actually prevents many from voting in primaries.

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/politics/2007/12/24/toobin.caucus.cnn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
youthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. because it is not a primary, and there aren't ballots.
Edited on Sat Dec-29-07 11:09 AM by youthere
It's a unique process we Iowans love and fight to the death to defend. We actually switched to a regular primary at one time and promptly switched back because Iowans hated the primary process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellstone dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. We caucus in Minnesota as well
and it is a great process which, in effect, allows those who would vote for losing candidates to immediately support their second choice candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Instant run-off voting allows voters to mark their 1st, 2nd, and 3rd choices -
so a primary could allow that positive aspect of caucusing.

My concern about caucusing is that, because it requires more effort than casting a paper ballot, fewer people will participate. It particularly reduce participation of people who already feel they are not readily accepted in society -- some elderly, poor, and members of minority groups who would feel social pressure to not participate.

Thom Hartmann has said that the Republican party has discussed using caucuses nationwide because it will put more power into the hands of fewer and fewer people -- just those people who have jobs and lives and personalities that tend to make them already dominant members of society.

What do you think are pros & cons of having caucuses instead of a primary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I think I like it better because we actually discuss the candidates
rather than just cast our lot. I sit with my friends and neighbors and listen to what's important to them when considering the candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I like the fact that caucuses allow for real participatory democracy -
talking with friends and neighbors about the candidates and issues. Do you vote in your caucus by going to a particular location in a room so everyone can see how you voted or do you vote by casting a paper ballot? I would think that allowing anonymous ballots would be helpful for people who feel marginalized and are intimidated by the social aspect of caucusing -- they could attend and listen and cast their ballot without feeling pressure to interact.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. No ballots. We stand together for our candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. and even occasionally change some minds and get support for those second tier candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TN al Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. I have voted in both the republican and democratic caucusses in Iowa in the past
I am ashamed to admit the former but the two are held differently. I might add that I was only 17 when I voted in the gop caucus in 1980 and went their with a friend who was also only 17. While the law allows you to vote as long as you are 18 before the general election, both of us missed it by about 6 weeks. Somebody pointed out that we were young and we were asked if we would be 18 that year and we both truthfully said that we would so they allowed us to vote. We were both born in December. Anyway in the GOP they just vote as if it were a primary, secret ballot and all. They do ask if anyone wants to say a few words for a candidate first and there are some amateurish attempts to do so but it is basically a primary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 01:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC