|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-29-07 09:26 AM Original message |
Is it in our national interest to support an independent investigation into Bhutto's assassination? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-29-07 09:27 AM Response to Original message |
1. No. Get rid of OUR corrupt admin, then we'll talk. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-29-07 09:29 AM Response to Original message |
2. We Have Propped Up Dictators From Reza Pahlavi To Mobutu Sese Seko To Ferdinand Marcos |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-29-07 09:52 AM Response to Reply #2 |
9. Nothing but trouble |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pale Blue Dot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-29-07 09:33 AM Response to Original message |
3. The truth should always be in our national interest. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-29-07 09:34 AM Response to Original message |
4. What we need is an independent investigation of why we invaded Iraq |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mac2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-29-07 09:39 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Dumb |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-29-07 09:48 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Where do you get that 70% want bush impeached? I didn't see too much outrage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-29-07 09:40 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Independent investigation of why we invaded Iraq |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mac2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-29-07 09:36 AM Response to Original message |
5. No hearings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-29-07 09:52 AM Response to Original message |
10. only if it involves... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1corona4u (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-29-07 09:59 AM Response to Original message |
11. Yes, but it has to be conducted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-29-07 10:04 AM Response to Original message |
12. Define National Interest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 06:25 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC