Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do You Support An Independent Investigation Into The Assassination Of Benazir Bhutto?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 07:57 AM
Original message
Poll question: Do You Support An Independent Investigation Into The Assassination Of Benazir Bhutto?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. how is that going to happen ?
i agree with Chris Dodd, the first issue is stability. and i don't think it will help much to bring in outsiders into the country to investigate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Once The Chaos Subsides...
It's important to find out who was responsible for the assassination; the government or insurgents... If it's the former they have forfeited their right to lead...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. didn't Mush forfeit his right to lead when he overthrew the elected govt ?
and while the chaos may subside for short periods, getting stability is going to take a very long time.

sadly, much of this was dependent on Bhutto. these were problems that existed before she was killed and now just got worse but with nobody to lead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I Don't Like Mush But It's Not Inconceivable Something Worse Could Follow
Edited on Sat Dec-29-07 08:23 AM by DemocratSinceBirth
I don't have the answers...I was in grad school when The Shah was overthrown...The same Iranians who were protesting the Shah were later protesting Khomenei... My good friend, Hamid, who came from a wealthy family, married an American young woman ,and never went back...

That part of the world is difficult to navigate...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. the thing is that Pakistan has nuclear weapons, and that's why it's different
from the other cases. that's why stability is so important. some time back a poll was done on nations around the world and their opinion of the United States. pakistan had a much lower view than many arab nations where we have done much more harm.

if we had a real President who cared and understood these things then i think they would have been able to pressure Musharaff into doing more to control the extremist elements from early on. but instead we have a dumbass who goes by his disgusting gut rather than read and inform himself on these things.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Maybe I'm Naive
But he had the opportunity to do the right thing... He could have simultaneously combatted the extremists, led his people to some semblance of democracy, and restored civil institutions... But he didn't... That part of the world is really messed up...Maybe it's wrong to apply western standards in the first place...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #13
20. check out this poll of people in Pakistan
i think it makes it easier to understand why it's not so easy. i think Pakistan needed someone like Bhutto who was willing to risk her life to get the things you mention done.

http://intellibriefs.blogspot.com/2007/09/new-poll-on-trends-in-pakistan.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #6
39. At this point,
I think it is very likely that something far worse than Musharraf is gaining control in Pakistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
3. Beginning to look more and more like a government cover up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. i think the govt is trying to avoid blame for not providing enough protection
for not doing enough for Bhutto.

but i don't think they (Musharraf) had her killed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. I Don't Think Mush Is Responsible Either
I think it's the work of insurgents who saw Bhutto as a threat...Order and liberalization is their worst enemy... I think Mush wouldn't mind retirement or exile in London or the States... I think he wants out...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #8
29. What about the CIA?
you think there is any potential for involvement there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. I believe there is a high probability that Musharraf was involved.........
even if it was from a 'distance'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #14
21. why do you think that ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
7. I voted no . . . but . . . not that I don't think an investigation is a worthy effort
but it is not our business to call for one . . . they are an independent, sovereign nation and should handle it themselves, without our involvement
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Then They Shouldn't Take Our Billions In Aid
~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. still do not agree that we should be meddling in their country
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy M Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
9. It's hard to believe some would vote against......
having an independent investigation of her assassination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #9
17. This is a very sensitive situation
The question is would the investigation show Musharraf was responsible. If so, what would happen to him. Would there be a popular uprising to toss him out? Then who would succeed him in power?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #17
23. If He Had Bhutto Killed After Inviting Her Back He's Unfit To Lead
That being said I don't think he's responsible and his abolution by an independent body might restore some legitimacy...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #9
33. By whom? The investigators have to be nominated by somebody, which means that the investigation is
NEVER independent, but often useless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razorman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
10. The question then would be, "An investigation by whom?"
It is not our business, and the U.N. is incompetent. So, who could be trusted to investigate the matter fairly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #10
19. How about Interpol? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razorman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #19
43. That might work. I had forgotten about them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
15. we have no jurisdiction in another sovereign nation
I mean, honestly, what are people thinking with this?
its up to Pakistanis to demand that of their own govt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #15
24. If They Had Fair Elections He Would Be Gone
His only claim to legitimacy rests on the fact that he has the military behind him...It's a junta, plain and simple...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #24
42. but that's irrelevant.... its their country
we have no legitimate right to determine how another sovereign country should govern itself.

not that that has stopped us in the past.

Of course, I realize that the neocon/AIPAC/DLC agenda is "global american leadership", but that doesn't mean its right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
16. No, I don't support what amounts to pointless political grandstanding on my taxpayer dime
This is another inside-the-beltway brain fart by the politics as usual gang.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #16
25. Did You Oppose The Independent Investigation Into The Assassination Of Rafik Hariri?
~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #25
34. Are you talking about the U.N. probe into Hariri's assassination?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Red Zelda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
22. I don't care who killed her
There's enough trouble right here in Dumbfuckistan to worry about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
26. For what reason? Will it be as 'productive' as the 9/11 investigation?
And why should we get more deeply involved in this, inspiring more hate in the world? Because there would be some on both sides who wouldn't believe whatever results an investigation would come up with. I think the Pakistanis need to want one, and to do their own investigating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
27. Meddlesome and paternalistic
Mussaharaf should be given a chance to produce a credible investigation before we wade in there. We can support his efforts behind the scenes without playing Big Brother, a role that would only further inflame opposition to us on the ground. If he proves uninterested and/or incapable of results, then we can take it to the next level.

This is Obama's position and it is much closer to what the world needs to see in the post GWB era than what your girl is advocating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. That's John Kasich's , Cliff Mays' And George Bush*'s Position Too
Congratulations....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. And Biden's...who is far more credible on this issue than ex-FLOTUS
== I urge Pakistan’s leaders to open a fully accountable and transparent investigation. We must find out who was behind this and bring those responsible to justice. And the United States should offer any assistance necessary, including investigative teams, to get to the bottom of this horror.==

http://www.joebiden.com/newscenter/pressreleases?id=0264
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. Benazhir Bhutto Wrote In A Letter To Only Be Revealed After Her Death
Edited on Sat Dec-29-07 09:43 AM by DemocratSinceBirth
That if she was killed Musharraf was responsible... Maybe she was being paranoid but given the suspicious circumstances that surrounded her death I don't think it's prudent to let the man she claimed was responsible for her death to conduct the investigation...

If you think Musharraf and the institutions he controls are the proper authorities to conduct the investigation there is nothing I can do to disabuse you of that notion...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #32
35. Not what I said
He gets first chance; he fails then we organize an alternative with the international community.

Hilly is jumping the gun here. Must be those second-rate FP advisers of hers again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #35
38. He Had Disbanded The Independent Judiciary
Edited on Sat Dec-29-07 10:09 AM by DemocratSinceBirth
He just recently lifted martial law...If you have faith that (ex) General Musharraf and his minions are capable of rendering impartial justice there is nothing I can do to disabuse you of that notion...

It's propping up dictators that has got us into this mess...If you think continuing to prop them up will get us out there is nothing I can do (reprise) to disabuse you of that notion...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #32
36. Because the US government is?
This is a tragedy, but we do not need to add to that something that would be nothing more than our country becoming the policeman of the world.

In addition, while I respect Benazir Bhutto, she was far from being the saint that the media and the US pols want her to be, and this largely because she was educated in the West and that they could recognize themselves in her. Pakistan is in a difficult situation, and the last times we meddled in situations like that, it gave us a few tragedies (Chile, Nicaragua, Afghanistan, Iran, ...) just because we refuse to recognize that some factions that do not look like us are not legitimate partners. May be it is time to learn how to wait and see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #36
40. We Propped Up Dictators In Chile, Nicaragua, And Iran
Pinochet, Somoza, and Reza Pahlavi were our "guys"...

We started the fire...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #40
41. Because we did not like who was there and we made the things worse.
No need to do that again, so the issue is: who will lead this independent inquiry?

In addition, Bhutto was not the saint we want her to have been. She did not deserve her death because nobody does, but we should avoid to see her as the new Ghandi. She was not. The only reason the US like her so much is because she was educated in England and they understand her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #41
44. The US Should Not Conduct The Investigation
Edited on Sat Dec-29-07 10:27 AM by DemocratSinceBirth
It should be conducted by the U N ...

No...Benazir Bhutto wasn't a saint but she displayed uncommon courage by going back to a situation where her life was endangered and for her uncommon courage she is now a martyr...

I don't thik Mushurraf is responsible for her death , ironically...He worked too hard with Bush* to bring her back... The only thing that can save him, imho, is proof that he wasn't involved...

He can no more govern with this over his head than Marcos could govern when he was suspected of assassinating Benigno Aquino and the situation in The Phillipines was nowhere near as tenuous...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
31. By the US government? By the Pakistani government? Please.
We all know that it will end with what the powers in place want to hear, that Al Quaeda is guilty, whether it is or not. The situation is more complex than that, given that the Musharaff govt is probably deeply infiltrated by them.

So, we can play policemen of the world, or we can try to talk with people. This election may be about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
37. Yes, but it needs to be conducted
by the International community. The point of course, is to find out if Musharraf had anything to do with it. It can not be done inside Pakistan, and it can not be done by the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 04:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC