Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A genuine concern: Obama chief strategist Axelrod, what if he screws up in the general election?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DemKR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:09 PM
Original message
A genuine concern: Obama chief strategist Axelrod, what if he screws up in the general election?
We need someone who has experience running campaigns.....Do you know how the Republicans would have a field day when the Obama folks say things without thinking first? Sigh..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. You have GOT to be kidding me.
Really, how transparent can this get today??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. They're no longer worried about transparency.
Bitch. Rinse. Repeat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Like Mark Penn?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes I'd MUCH rather have a creep like Mark Penn in control of things
He's done such a good job so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. Mark Penn
Nuff said
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeamJordan23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yeah, lets throw Penn up on Hardball today and see who would screw what up. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KennedyGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. No no..musn't question Obamas inexperience now...
Musn't do that..
Not allowed..
Nope..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Well, I question Obama AND Hillary's non-experience. Stop pretending Hillary has relevant
experience.


She doesn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
7. When did he screw up? Did I miss something? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. No, you didn't. Don't mind DemKR.
They apparently live in their own little bubble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
48. Axelrod brought up a valid point....Invading Iraq took our eyes off the ball elsewhere...
such as afghanistan and pakistan, where there were REAL threats of al queda. This is an arguement that was made, by the way, BEFORE the invasion of Iraq. But it did not stop Bush from waging war against Iraq.

Since Hillary, Biden and Edwards voted for the IWR, it would be a valid criticism that shows a lack of judgement on all of their parts. Obama at the time warned against Iraq, and mentioned that it would distract our attention from the real threats in the world.

So Axelrod raised a valid point.

Did Axelrod politicise Bhuto's assassination? It already was politicised by the media, and the specific question Axelrod was asked. Making it sound like Hillary would benefit from the assassination because of her "experience" was politicizing the event. Axelrod did what he could to point out that in the real world mistakes have consequenses. Iraq was a mistake, and it helped destabilize the region. It was out of this destabilization that Bhuto was killed. The really sad thing is that so many of Hillary's Fan Club were so dishonest as to say Axelrod said Hillary killed Bhuto. Leave it to that fan club to twist things around in an Orwellian style.

Now in a few days they will be denying they ever said this about Axelrod. Figures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
8. What a fucking joke nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nailzberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
9. Thanks for your "concern"
:boring:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
11. I'd be more concerned about Mark Penn attacking Huckabee's kindergarten ambitions in the GE.
Edited on Thu Dec-27-07 05:13 PM by ClarkUSA
We don't need another idiotic mistake like THAT again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
12. the only one screwing up is YOU. You've totally overplayed this. Hillary already played the death t
to her advantage. She and you are hypocrites.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
14. As opposed to Tony Blair's favorite boy, Mark Penn? NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
15. I certainly hope he wouldn't bring up their Kindergarten papers or anything
because that makes a campaign look idiotic.

Can you imagine if they pointed out that the Iraq War diverted attention from our real problems in Afghanistan and Pakistan? Wow, that would be a disaster, wouldn't it?

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KennedyGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. They should..they were the most intelligent thing he has put forth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
17. Luckily for us, he won't get the chance. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
19. Silly post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CyberPieHole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
20. If Obama gets the nod and Axelrod is behind him we will lose in the GE...
that's what will happen.

:kick: and recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemKR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. agreed. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Care to explain why genius?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Care to explain why genius?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
21. Genuine concern my ass...Nothing more than being a usual Hill shill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #21
39. she's an ass, we're not all like that. hopefully she realizes she does her candidate no favors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
25. legitimate point. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
26. Amazing - all these Obama supporters replies and not one address's the question
It seems its easier to attack he messengers than the message - something thats way to common on here. As someone who does not support Clinton or Obama I can't fathom why anyone would even want to be associated with this type of behavior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. ahh - somebody who GETS IT!
don't pay attention to the man behind the curtain - ignor what he said...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. I am very "concerned" FreeState won't stop.
Ditto what she said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #34
41. Excuse me? I wont stop what? Asking why no one addressed the OPS concerns?
Edited on Thu Dec-27-07 05:57 PM by FreeState
Yes please attack me - good god this place is nuts sometimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #31
42. Excuse me? Beating my wife? WTF?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. It's an old saw, and admittedly distasteful.
But please, tell me what was wrong with what Axelrod said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. Why are you using it if its distasteful? As someone who has worked with domestic violence victims
Edited on Thu Dec-27-07 06:07 PM by FreeState
its beyond distateful. Its disgusting and vile.

IMO Axelrod should have said "no comment" to the reporter and not answered the question. Same goes for Clintons side as well. A little respect for the dead in time of morning goes a long way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. I apologize, I should never have used that expression.
As for what Axelrod said, he was asked a direct question and he needed to answer it in a way that reflected well upon his candidate. He did exactly that. Saying "no comment" would have been spun as an example of Obama's "lack of experience". Basically, anything Obama says about it will be spun negatively, since the accepted MSM frame is "Obama lacks experience in foreign policy". Therefore, Axelrod was smart to get a jab in at Sen. Clinton when he had the chance.

As for the Clinton campaign, Evan Bayh made an unsolicited statement about how Bhutto's assassination should be a reminder of Sen. Clinton's foreign policy credentials.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. I don't see any Hillary Gagglers criticising Bayh for politicising the death...
Good point!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
28. If I'm looking for someone with experience, I'll go with Biden
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
29. Personally, I'm concerned about the Wandering Clenis
What if the he screws up in the General Election? I mean, do you know how the Republicans will have a field day when Bill unzips without thinking first?

No really, I'm genuinely concerned about it. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #29
50. Rightly so....even if it would be a false accusation, everyone would believe it
And of course it would serve to remind everyone once again of Hillary's enabling of the errant penis, or at least turning the other way because of fear of political ramifications to her career....

But of course this surprise will be played later....if need be....during the general election. And so predictable. If you are not a member of the Hillary Herd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
30. Axelrod has experience with campaigns...
Richard Daley, Elliot Spitzer, Deval Patrick, and John Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. Wow, what a list of screw-ups! Can't have him involved in a campaign!
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. self-delete
Edited on Thu Dec-27-07 05:53 PM by ClarkUSA
wrong place on thread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemKR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
33. So you approve of his comments?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. Are you talking to yourself?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #35
52. ....
:spray:

I just doused my desk with my beverage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
37. At some point or another someone is going to be an asshole or make a mistake...
Edited on Thu Dec-27-07 05:49 PM by annie1
and that goes for everyone's campaigns. Axelrod made an asshole statement. Shaheen made an equally or worse asshole statement. Biden's put his foot in his mouth tons of times. and the same will go for those on the pub side. it's how it goes. don't be foolish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
38. yeah, we dont need people speaking the TRUTH in the General
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
40. What Obama Campaign Manager David Axelrod REALLY said in response in reporters' questioning....
Today after Barack Obama's closing argument speech in Iowa, Obama adviser David Axelrod parried questions from reporters who pressed him
on whether the killing could help Hillary.

Here's one key exchange:

REPORTER: But looking ahead, does the assassination put on the front burner foreign policy credentials in the closing days?

AXELROD: Well, it puts on the table foreign policy judgment, and that's a discussion we welcome. Barack Obama had the judgment to oppose the
war in Iraq, and he warned at the time it would divert us from Afghanistan and al Qaeda, and now we see the effect of that. Al Qaeda's resurgent,
they're a powerful force now in Pakistan, they may have been involved -- we've been here, so I don't know whether the news has been updated,
but there's a suspicion they may have been involved in this.

I think his judgment was good. Senator Clinton made a different judgment, so let's have that discussion.

http://tpmelectioncentral.com/2007/12/obama_adviser_bhutto_assassination_reminds_us_that_hillary_made_wrong_call_on_iraq_war.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hayu_lol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. This really isn't our problem to solve...
I'm sure the principals will take care of the matter--as they should.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #40
51. That was a valid point. Something that has been brought out many times before by many folks....
I recall Wes Clark, in 04 making the point that invading Iraq was distracting our attention away from going after al queda in pakistan and afghanistan. This is, and has been, a valid criticism of the Iraq War from the start.

And, since the reporter was asking about Hillary being helped (which already politicised the topic)it was totally apppropriate to point out that the Iraq War had unfortunate consequenses on the spread of terror elsewhere in the Middle East. And it was entirely appropriate in a question asked about Hillary to respond to Hillary's role in endorsing that war by her vote. Although he could have added that Biden and Edwards also voted for the IWR.

So, if you look at experience, compare and contrast Obama's warning at the time that Iraq would distract our attention away from the real terrorists to Hillary's compliance with the most destabilizing event in the Middle East in years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #51
54. All kinds of problems are being attributed to Iraq, and rightly so.
I'm talking domestic stuff. Horrible responses to natural disasters like Katrina/Rita, tornadoes, and wildfires. Extremely porous borders and ports. Critical infrastructure in disrepair all over the country. All because we are diverting massive amounts of money and resources to this bullshit invasion and occupation.

Wes Clark's organization did a series of ads cataloging the issues that are the direct result of Iraq. "Remember, it's because of Iraq"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
46. By then, Mark Penn will be working for Obama, so there's no problem.
All Democratic hands will be on deck, including the wisdon of Mark Penn. I can't wait to see him at his best. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
many a good man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
53. Why O why do I keep clicking on these threads???
Why?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
55. You are so freakin'
disingenous..it's oozing outta your avatar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
56. thank you for your concern
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC