Clintons' NAFTA will cause 500,000 additional unauthorized border crossings from Mexico in 2008!

Dems Will Win

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Dec-27-07 11:51 AM
Original message

Clintons' NAFTA will cause 500,000 additional unauthorized border crossings from Mexico in 2008!

Edited on Thu Dec-27-07 12:00 PM by Dems Will Win

NAFTA caused much of the New Poor in Mexico

For those who don't know, the Clintons' NAFTA not only impoverished American farmers and textile workers and their families but also wiped out the Mexican corn-growing economy and the lives of 15 million people. About 5 million of those have illegally crossed into the US -- just because of NAFTA allowing cheap subsidized corn from the US into Mexico, dropping the corn price there 70%.

Next year NAFTA fully kicks in, meaning an additional 500,000 economic refugees that we ourselves caused. The former corn farmers and unemployed workers don't come because we are great, they come because the policies of both governments is starving their children.

And the Clintons pushed NAFTA through without the safeguards wanted by the Democrats. Remember Hillary chuckled and said it didn't work out the way we wanted!

NAFTA Will Boost Mexican Emigration to US

Mexico, Dec 16 (Prensa Latina) Mexican emigration to the United States will increase as of January 2008, when the tariffs on corn and beans will be lifted within the framework of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), expert Steve Suppan said on Saturday.

In statements to Prensa Latina, the experts from the Institute of Agricultural and Commercial Policies, based in Minneapolis, Minnesota, the United States, described rural migrations caused by NAFTA as the migration crisis that broke out in 1994, when the first NAFTA adjustments were made.

"There are many Mexican workers with little options and they resort to the hard march to the North seeking higher wages to help their families in their communities of origin," he noted.

Suppan noted that the situation will worsen as 300,000 farmers and 200,000 people from Mexican cities are expected to emigrate, due to the lack of development opportunities.

Experts are concerned at a forced economic exodus to the United States, a situation that will increase food insecurity in Mexico, he said.

The big economy will flood the small economy with its products and tragedy will mostly affect indigenous groups who had guarded their basic resources for humankind but are starving at present.

The governments of the United States, Canada and Mexico could renegotiate the NAFTA if they took into account the harm they are causing to the disposed, because only the big private consortiums will benefit instead of farmers and small businesspeople.

Suppan referred to the world campaign in favor of preserving food resources, especially corn, as a human right of economic use, and pointed out that the campaign could even be taken to the United Nations if there were political will.

http://www.plenglish.com:80/article.asp?ID=%7B1DB4A700-9AC6-4456-A056-AD159366BD31%7D&language=EN

Clinton Is New to Nafta Criticism, Obama Says

By Jeff Zeleny

MARION, Iowa � Senator Barack Obama is accusing Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton of waiting until she was a presidential candidate to suggest that the North American Free Trade Agreement -� enacted during her husband�s administration -� was a mistake.

�I think it�s important to note that Senator Clinton was a cheerleader for Nafta for more than a decade. As of a year ago, she was calling it a boon to the economy,� Mr. Obama told reporters here today. �It seems to me that the only thing that has changed in the last year is that it�s now election time.�

Mr. Obama opened a two-day Iowa campaign swing in this city outside of Cedar Rapids. As he delivered his criticism, he glanced down to his printed notes, which rested on a podium.

�As some of you probably heard at the debate the other night, Senator Clinton called Nafta a mistake,� Mr. Obama said. �I was pleased to hear her say that because, as more than 10,000 jobless Iowans know, that�s exactly what Nafta has been.�

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/11/18/clinton-new-to-nafta-criticism-obama-says/

Please recommend so that more understand what NAFTA hath wrought...