Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Edwards proposes $100 billion economy bailout

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-22-07 09:49 PM
Original message
Edwards proposes $100 billion economy bailout
LISBON, Iowa (AP) — Presidential candidate John Edwards on Saturday said the country can't simply wait for the economy to turn around, and he wants Congress to come up with as much as $100 billion to prepare for a potential economic slowdown. The Democrat and former North Carolina senator suggested an initial investment of $25 billion for job creation and other aid, and asked lawmakers to be prepared to come up with the rest if the economy slides into a recession.

Edwards said the economy is struggling because of the housing crisis and stagnant wages. Housing, energy and health care costs have increased, while the median income for working-age families dropped $2,400 between 2000 and 2006, he said.

"I've been concerned for some time that the economic growth in this country is completely concentrated in the top with big corporations and the richest Americans, and middle class families are struggling," Edwards said at a news conference after a stop in eastern Iowa "We need to stimulate the part of the economy that helps working families."

He didn't propose how to pay for the plan, saying it's his first policy proposal where he hasn't come up with a detailed plan for funding. "It's a one time thing and it's paid for by growing the economy," he said.

...Several of Edwards' economic proposals, including some of his energy and housing proposals, have been included in other policy plans he has offered over the course of the presidential campaign.

However, his proposal that Congress act now to shore up the economy rather than waiting for a new president to be elected is new, his campaign said.

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/22/edwards-proposes-100-billion-economy-bailout/

Sounds a little over-the-top. He probably should have stopped at the $25 billion for job creation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-22-07 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. it`s a bad plan and it`s not what we need
where to get the money? where`s that 70 billion going next year? that`s a huge amount of money that could be a start in a multi billion public works projects to rebuild our country from the ground up. we have the workers and we know how to start tomorrow morning at 7o`clock....so were do we sign up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-22-07 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. He will pull the troops out of Iraq and spend the money
going into Iraq on economic development. Investment in jobs here in our country will generate tax revenue. Here in California, the headline of the L.A. Times today stated that the state has to cut back funds to schools and other things because of the economic slowdown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-22-07 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. except he wants the congress to do it now. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-22-07 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Bloomberg reports this as a $25 billion stimulus package
==Edwards, who is competing with Senators Hillary Clinton of New York and Barack Obama of Illinois to finish first in Iowa's Jan. 3 Democratic caucus, called on Congress to approve a $25 billion package of investments in clean energy, job training and unemployment benefits. He said lawmakers should be prepared to allocate another $75 billion in the event of a recession.==

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=aXbpnWFEErMo&refer=us

That sounds much better; if he had left out the $75 billion allocation, which only contingency money, no one could have put the $100 billion price tag out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fenriswolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-22-07 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. i weep for our children
when we say spending money for jobs must remain below 25 billion, when we have squandered so many resources in the systamatic destruction of the middle east.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-22-07 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. "He didn't propose how to pay for the plan, "
He's left himself open for the "He wants to raise your taxes 100 Billion dollars" line from the GOP.
So let's see - if we can't risk Obama, can't afford Edwards, and can't stand Clinton...
Vote for Bill Richardson!! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-22-07 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. this is silly. Even if Congress managed to pass it, bush would veto it.
And Edwards knows that, so what's he doing here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-22-07 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. Why does John Edwards hate AMERICA ???
Edited on Sat Dec-22-07 10:20 PM by K Gardner
:sarcasm:

(edited to add that I cannot believe people here are dissing anyone who realizes the economy is about to tank. Bookmark this thread for future reference when it does, then slam him)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 05:24 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. True that...
...I don't even hear any other candidates addressing the issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 06:42 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Not true:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. because this is pointless. Look, I believe Edwards is sincere
but this isn't a solution. It's absurd to suggest doing this now when there isn't a prayer of a chance of it becoming law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC