Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dear Iowa & NH: Please tell the "Top Three" No, thank you!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-22-07 09:06 PM
Original message
Dear Iowa & NH: Please tell the "Top Three" No, thank you!
Four fine Democrats for you to consider:

Joe Biden:
http://www.joebiden.com/
http://biden.senate.gov/index.cfm

Chris Dodd:
http://chrisdodd.com/
http://www.youtube.com/user/SenatorDodd

Dennis Kucinich:
http://www.dennis4president.com/
http://www.youtube.com/denniskucinich

Bill Richardson:
www.2013IsTooLate.com
www.TheDifferenceOnIraq.com
www.richardsonforpresident.com

C'mon, Iowa and New Hampshire - Make History!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-22-07 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. They are fine Democrats
Recommended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IA_Seth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-22-07 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. I thought you wrote Iowa off already, as a Republican stronghold?
Remember?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-22-07 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Seth, in Iowa, Republicans and Democrats caucus separately.
Unless the rules have changed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-22-07 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. That was just for yard signs
:crazy:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-22-07 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. No, wait - that was about that bumper sticker question?!
Edited on Sat Dec-22-07 10:29 PM by MethuenProgressive
Somebody days ago asked 'what bumpersticker you'd probably see the most of in Iowa' and I answered "Huckabee!" and someone took offense. Was that Seth?
Is that old thread what you were referring to, Seth? Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-22-07 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Well, you didn't just answer "Huckabee!"
You also were rather insulting to Iowa Democratic voters.

No matter what happened in 2004 Iowa Democrats regrouped in 2006 and elected a Democratic Governor/Lt. Governor, two new Democratic members of the US Congress (and reelected another one)and gained a majority in the Iowa Statehouse (both Representatives and state Senators). Iowa also has a Democratic Secretary of State, Attorney General, Treasurer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-22-07 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. I don't know why I ever took this guy off the ignore list
Zap he's on again. I like discussion. I don't care for his insults.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-22-07 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. What a great representative for Bill Richardson he is
Bet the Governor is proud!

:hi: Happy Holidays to you and Mrs. rurallib
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #15
24. Happy Holidays!
"Hope" you don't fall for anymore lies from ObamaNation!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #13
22. "You also were rather insulting to Iowa Democratic voters. " Nonsense.
Quote me or post a retraction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #22
27. Here's the link
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=3869274&mesg_id=3869274

You were rude to an Iowa DUers without cause. There was no reason for your post other than to instigate an argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. I was "rude to an Iowa DUers without cause." The DUer who called my logic "Dumb Ass"?
Edited on Sun Dec-23-07 10:51 AM by MethuenProgressive
Yes, I was rude to the rude Iowan (who used "Dumn Ass","Dumb Ass","ignorant") DUer. debi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #28
38. You don't think your first comment was rude?
Seems the comments made after your first one were exactly what you were trolling for, a senseless argument.

If anything your back and forth with that particular Iowan and another Iowan on this post and my previous experiences with you should have taught me not to correspond with you.

I hope I learn my lesson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. If you thought "Huckabee, probably. It's Iowa after all." was "rude," I apologize...
Edited on Sun Dec-23-07 03:30 PM by MethuenProgressive
..and respectfully disagree.
Good luck to your candidate! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-22-07 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. What happend to your HIllary love?
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-22-07 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. A common delusion among Obamanation and the Edwardians is...
Edited on Sat Dec-22-07 09:50 PM by MethuenProgressive
... that anyone opposing their candidate must be a supporter of Clinton. It's a delusion that's rooted deep in their inability to defend their candidate when challenged. With out anything of substance to offer, they reflexively squeal "HillBot!" out of desperation.

I do confess to ridiculing and mocking you members of DU's Rabid HillHaterCult.
Please, feel free to continue to be offended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-22-07 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Hey I'm not going to argue with you over who you support....
you just get awful happy when Team Hillary posts good news. Sorry if I mistook that as support
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-22-07 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #14
23. Typical squeal from ObamaNation - "You're a liar! You're a HillBot!"
Clark, do you ever post anything but hate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #6
31. This is the first time I've seen that she's not #2 in your sig. line
I definitely got the sense from your posts that there was some 'love' going on there. What happened? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. I have a soft spot for underdogs.
And in DUniverese, she's an underdog!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diane R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-22-07 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. Dear Iowa and New Hampshire: Any chance we might get a chance to choose the nominee sometime?
Just asking.

None of us get a vote. By time you're all done with your two years of glory, getting to know the candidates personally, it's over. We never see them, much less in a one-on-one personal ego fest.

I'm sick of only two states getting to choose. I'm sick of waiting to see what you decide for us. I cannot imagine what qualifies Iowans and New Hampshire residents to be the only states who have a voice in choosing our president.

And just for the record? If I had a vote, which of course I don't.....I would vote for Obama. Then Edwards. Just not Hillary.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-22-07 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. The chances are you won't have the choices that Iowa and NH have.
But if primaries were all held on the same day few states would ever see much of all the candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diane R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-22-07 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. Well, most of us get nothing, so if we see just a little, that would be an improvement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-22-07 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
20. I'm from Iowa and I do understand....
what you're saying.

I feel so blessed to have all of this political hoopla in my state.

You're right, we get to meet the candidates face to face, and the only
thing stopping us from asking them a question, is ourselves.

It really is wonderful.

I would totally understand if this process evolved into rotating states that
got the 1st, 2nd and 3rd spots. I love that I live in a state that is first,
but I can understand how others feel that they are left out--because by the
time they get to vote, we have our nominee.

My grandest hope is that the initial primary process NEVER stops being about
challenging the candidates and holding them accountable to one-on-one, meaningful
contact with "We The People." It has to be this way. If we have multiple primaries
on one day, the personal contact ceases and the candidate with the most money for
vacuous ads wins the day.

That would be tragic.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #4
34. remind me please
about President McCain or Buchanan?

I don't seem to remember their terms, despite NH choosing them for the rest of the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #4
35. Maybe Iowa & NH voters should just stay home then huh?
Would that make you feel better? You do realize that it isnt the voters who chose when we vote... dont you? If I could change the NH constitution re: our primary status, I wouldnt hesitate to do so if for no other reason than to not be on the receiving end of posts like this.

Youre sick of two states getting to chose and Im sick of being made to feel like shit because I live in one of those two states. Its not some grand conspiracy by the residents designed to steal everyones voice... yet thats exactly how we're treated every primary season. Lucky us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Maybe the result would be different in not decided by just white rural christians?
I'm just askin'...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #36
41. White rural christians?
Yeah. We're all a bunch of knuckle-dragging, bible-thumping, shack dwellers. Seriously. Give me a break. There was a poll posted here last week, wish I could search for the link, that compared NH voters to the rest of the country. It showed that religion has no bearing on our votes. Whereas it does in the rest of the US.

And considering that a vast percentage of the people I know (myself included) are Atheists... I think you're view of the people that live in this state is distorted by stereotypes.

Again... I do not have control over when we vote. And I dont really care about voting first or not. I just dont understand why its ok to vilify voters due to state policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #41
50. bunnies, the overwhelming majority of NH & Iowa residents fit that demo.
...while the rest of America does not.

"I think you're view of the people that live in this state is distorted by stereotypes."

If you have figures that contradict the US census, please share, so I may learn from them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #35
42. If it ain't the voters who choose when you vote, who is it? The NH
"Constitution Bunny?"

Your legislative process must surely provide for an amendment process. And the voters MUST be involved at some level....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #42
53. I'll tell you what MADem...
I will look into it. Short of harassing my rep.. I wouldnt know how to instigate an amendment. Maybe I can start a petition? a PAC? I'll gladly take suggestions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-25-07 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #53
56. You do realize that the "First in the nation" crap is a big money industry for NH
THAT is why they guard it so zealously. It's a NH "industry" just as the caucuses are an IA "industry." The hotels, restaurants, printers, car hire joints, they all make a BUNDLE offa NH. You'd have better luck legalizing prostitution in "Live Free or Die" NH than getting the legislators to get behind the idea of no longer being "first."

Background:

    An Economic Bonanza
    Holding the first-in-the-nation primary confers enormous economic benefits on New Hampshire, and state officials zealously guard the first status. It is no exaggeration to say that the long courtship of New Hampshire voters provides a comparable and probably greater boost to the state than a major party nominating convention provides to a host city. That figure is more than $100 million. For New Hampshire the visits are spread out over a year-plus. The candidates, their aides, reporters, camera crews, representatives of a number of interest groups seeking to get their messages out, and various hangers-on all flock to the state and spend money on rental cars, hotel rooms, taxis, food, event costs and advertising campaigns.

    Staying First
    In sum, the New Hampshire primary has developed into a healthy industry. In fact, New Hampshire's first status is set in state law: "The presidential primary election shall be held on the second Tuesday in March or on the Tuesday at least 7 days immediately preceding the date on which any other state shall hold a similar election, whichever is earlier…" (New Hampshire Revised Statutes Annotated Title 63, Chapter 653.9).

    Nonetheless, there are always concerns about the future and health of the New Hampshire primary. New Hampshire's special position is not without critics (see for example the Nov. 2001 resolution (PDF) of the Michigan Democratic Party). Other states have on occasion attempted to impinge on the Granite State's first status. In-state observers keep a close watch on its pulse. For example, during the 2000 primary, Concord Monitor editor Mike Pride voiced qualms about the big media presence. "They're getting here sooner and sooner, so if somebody, a candidate, shows up… there's forty cameras around."
    http://www.gwu.edu/~action/2004/chrnnewh.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #56
58. exactly. its futile.
Which brings me back to my point that theres nothing NH voters can do about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-22-07 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
11. I support Edwards but have no problem with any of these 4.
ABC.....Anyone But Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-22-07 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. Me too...anyone but Clinton...
I would feel comfortable voting for any of our
candidates, except for Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surfermaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #11
45. Yourout, you go girl, right attitude
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #45
48. Right idea....wrong gender.
I would make one ugly female.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-22-07 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
12. I would be happy if any of these 4 wins Iowa and NH. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #12
25. It would great for our party, LWolf!
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surfermaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #12
44. LWolf, you have the right idea
We have to stick togeather or loose to the republicans, I am Edwards and have been since he ran for Senator, but I would vote fo Hillary in a NY moment... I think the republicans may be putting money in the dem. pot to help defeat Hillary....we had better be on our toes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeffR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-22-07 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
17. Love this post!
K & R!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #17
26. Thanks, Jeff!
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-22-07 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
18. K&R for 4 fine Democrats! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #18
29. Let's "Hope" the Democrats in Iowa and NH think so too!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
30. Seriously, the top three are the least qualified...
but rank highest in name recognition, so they get more fundraising, so they get the more media coverage, so they get more support, so they get more fundraising, etc.

If you like them for their qualifications, achievements and ideas, then great! But voters deserve a chance to see all of the candidates on a level playing field. If you really think there should be campaign finance reform and a return to the fairness doctrine, then each voter will take an hour of their time to study and consider each candidate as objectively as they can.

But if we keep rewarding top-tier by supporting them based on how much money they can raise, why on earth would they change the rules of a game that they're winning at?

Maybe Edwards will initiate some campaign finance reform, and I applaud his fundraising policies. Possibly Obama. But it's certainly not happening this election, and everybody seems willing and eager to play along.

Yes, I'm pissed that Biden's not getting a fair shake - same with the rest of the "second-tier".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. NH & Iowa have a chance to tell us that nomination is *not* for sale.
The 'second tier' is much more representitive of the Party's grassroots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
37. Biden gets my vote!
But I am not in IA or NH :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. I hope Joe Biden stays in after Iowa & NH so the rest of us can have a voice.
But that's not always the way things work out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kucinich4America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
43. I'd like to see two messages come out of this primary season:
1) Fuck the media whores, the corporations, and the DLC. We, THE PEOPLE, will decide the nominee.

2) We don't need a nominee in February, March, or even June. Let's take this all the way to Denver.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #43
51. Those are two messages I'd support!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
46. Don't some countries have about 12 parties at their elections?
Why can't we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hayu_lol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. Catchawave, yes there are countries who have multiple parties...
but they are, like England, Parlimentary systems. We are a Republic. Check the difference between the two systems.

Blair was removed from office(forced to resign)because he lost favor with a strong party of several. We have to impeach our Bum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. Thank you
Are we still a Democracy though? I just feel the whole Republic system exploding if the "wrong" people head our two-party system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
52. Christmas Eve Afternoon Kick.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
red2blue Donating Member (70 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
54. We have a great field to choose from
GO JOHN GO


EDWARDS 08
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-24-07 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. Once you look past the MSM's Top Three :O)
Good luck to your candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
57. After Christmas kick!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
59. kick!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
60. C'mon Iowa and New Hampshire! Make history!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC