Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Joe Wilson - The Real Hillary I Know — and the Unreal Obama

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
NewHampster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 04:27 PM
Original message
Joe Wilson - The Real Hillary I Know — and the Unreal Obama
http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/12/21/the-real-hillary-i-know-and-the-unreal-obama/

Joe Wilson of Valerie Plame fame writes a well thought out comparison of two candidates.

Yesterday the London Times reported central questions about Senator Obama’s shocking dearth of international experience: “Fresh doubts over Barack Obama’s foreign policy credentials were expressed on both sides of the Atlantic last night, after it emerged that he had made only one brief official visit to London - and none elsewhere in Western Europe or Latin America.” It also reported: “Mr. Obama had failed to convene a single policy meeting of the Senate European subcommittee, of which he is chairman.”
<snip>
A number of us, like then Illinois state senator Obama, opposed the second Gulf War. My own opposition from the beginning has been well documented. I fought the fight in the arena itself, Washington DC, against a ruthless administration and its supporters while the senator’s opposition came from a far distance and carried no risk, given that he represented in Springfield, Illinois the district encompassing the University of Chicago. As an obscure but safe provincial political figure, he never was granted access to the distorted intelligence that was used to drive the Congress and the media. When I looked to the left or to the right for support, I never saw the state senator. In fact, I never heard of Barack Obama until he announced his intention to run for the Senate in the 2006 election.
<snip>

We know that she has won and lost but always fought for her beliefs, which are widely shared within the Democratic Party. The battles she had been in have been fierce–and the battles in the future will be no less intense–and she has proven her steadfastness and is still standing. She does not have a cowardly record of voting “present” when confronted with difficult issues. She does not claim “intuition” as the basis of the most dangerous and serious decision-making. What she has is deep and vital experience, more important than ever in restoring our country’s place in the world.

From No Quarter http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/12/21/the-real-hillary-i-know-and-the-unreal-obama/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. awesome. I love Joe Wilson!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stellanoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. I just responded to this article over at the Huff Post
Edited on Fri Dec-21-07 04:32 PM by stellanoir
I said. . .


This comment is pending approval and won't be displayed until it is approved.
Mr. Wilson,

Though I have tremendous respect for your perspectives and your career, comparing Obama's intuitive function to the most incurious george dubious' gut instincts, his perverse proclivity for allegedly having God telling him to wage preemptive and unnecessary wars, and his acute shadow projection is simply not fair.

Perhaps it would be appropriate to have a leader who uses BOTH sides of their cranium, instead of logic, strategy, and linear thought alone.

Obama has something attributes that * could never have. Those would be common sense and a conscience.

As a 13th generational American on my maternal side, I'd love to see anything but a caucasian male as a president and feel that's long overdue.

However, if we're gonna have a female president, I'd rather it not be a corporatist masquerading as a hawkish male.

Nor do I want two families controlling the executive branch of government for over two decades. America is not about dynasties or it wasn't supposed to be.

Time for a change and a new paradigm for sure.

http://www.sedonadigitalarts.com/html/video_previews.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewHampster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Joe Wilson knows foriegn policy
I don't claim to know squat so I trust in the judgment of proven people like Wilson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stellanoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. I'm well aware that he knows foreign policy
and I've a tremendous amount of respect for him and he and his wife's life paths.

I've met him cursorily on a number of occasions and heard him speak several times at events.

However, I don't agree with the comparison that Obama's instincts would even remotely resemble *'s by any stretch of the imagination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewHampster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. fair enough
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R!
He has been well liked on DU, but I guess that is about to change. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Ha
The Republicans also turned on him...He was the last American diplomat to leave Iraq prior to Gulf War One... He didn't leave until all the hostages were free... He got a special commendation from Bush Pere for his bravery but that mattered naught when he debunked "the Saddam was builiding a nuke" story...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
desi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
73. Nah Billy...
Joe is a man of integrity and no amount of bashing from the usual suspects is going to change that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. Joe Wilson for Director of the CIA!!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewHampster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. lol
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. LOL. What tripe. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. More jealousy from ObamaNation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
29. This article would make a fine addition to desperatehillaryattacks.com
It's just the thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. It's an attack? Buck up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. It's just so blatently biased and twisted it's almost hard to believe
anyone would take it seriously. The author can't even get his dates right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. Biased and twisted?
It's an opinion piece, written by an individual, of coarse it's biased. But an attack? You BHO supporters sure are quick to play the victim card, jeezus, it's a campaign! Toughen up or go the hell home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Your Christmas spirit didn't even last 24 hours. Now THAT is pure pig tripe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #12
25. We could only hope for a 24 hour break of having to read yours.
Now THAT would be a True Christmas Present indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #25
43. Even simpletons should be able to figure out the ignore feature
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #43
48. But these are like.. genetically modified simpletons
Twice the simple!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
26. WOW!
What a DISTINCT CONTRAST...How did Joe put it....? "As an OBSURE but SAFE ( of course he's safe the guy can't even be decisive on a VOTE!) provincial political figure". LOL!!!


OBAMA HOME ALREADY!!!

It takes a person OF LEADERSHIP who has served and put himself out there...a lifetime of work and battles..to recognise the LEADERSHIP QUALITYS OF A TRUE AND DEDICATED LEADER...PERIOD!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. What is your point? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maximusveritas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. Well thought out? He doesn't even remember that Obama ran for Senate in 2004, not 2006
Maybe that's why he doesn't even know Obama was getting ready to run for Senate when he made his anti-war speech. So it did carry risk.

And I love this line: "he never was granted access to the distorted intelligence". Hillary had access to the full intelligence and didn't bother looking at it. Senator Graham did and that's why he opposed the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Well he's probably senile.
Like McGovern and Mondale?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maximusveritas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. No, just temporarily blinded by his support of Hillary
He'll come back to his senses after Obama wins the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. What a load.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
45. John Edwards is the person who had access to the full intelligence -
and didn't look at it. He was on the Intelligence Committee - Hillary was not.


Try again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maximusveritas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #45
50. Wrong - Hillary also had access
All the Senators had access, regardless of which committee they were on. Being on that committee only meant your aides had clearance to read it for you and report the results back to you. But she had access to read it on her own.

According to Senate aides, because Clinton was not yet on the Armed Services Committee, she did not have anyone working for her with the security clearances needed to read the entire N.I.E. and the other highly classified reports that pertained to Iraq. She could have done the reading herself. Senators were able to access the N.I.E. at two secure locations in the Capitol complex.


http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9A0DE3DC1430F930A35755C0A9619C8B63&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=print
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. I am amazed at how quickly our national heroes are attacked on DU
if they have independent thought. Our country is in trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Mc Govern, Mondale ....
the list goes on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
13. Thank You Joe Wilson. Well Done
:woohoo: :applause: :woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alamom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
14. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
19. Devastating...
Good job ambassador!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #19
31. Devasting? You are joking right?
Edited on Fri Dec-21-07 05:36 PM by calteacherguy
This is such a Hillary con-job article it's doesn't even pretend to be objective.

This will make a fine additioin to desperatehillaryattacks.com.

It's a keeper! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. Why, it doesn't mention COCAINE even once?
Edited on Fri Dec-21-07 05:40 PM by MNDemNY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avrdream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #34
54. Cocaine.
There you go teacher - something real for you to get mad about. Leave Joe Wilson's opinion alone. I let Oprah have her opinion, you let Joe have his.

Never mind, why do I bother?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
21. I really admire Joe Wilson, but there are a couple of issues I have
with this article:

- "I fought the fight in the arena itself, Washington DC, against a ruthless administration and its supporters"

(emphasis is mine)

Ironic considering Sen. Clinton's vote.

- "As an obscure but safe provincial political figure"

Not saying it isn't true, but hardly the kind of talk to get Illinoisans (and Midwesterners in general) pumped up for HRC.

Certainly some of his other points are very thought-provoking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
23. Why couldn't Wilson persuade Sen. Clinton to vote against the war then?
Since he knew that she'd been given 'distorted' intelligence?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewHampster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. win some lose some. NO Politician is perfect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #24
38. This is rather more than imperfection
I fail to see why he is giving Sen. Clinton a pass on this. There is simply no excuse for her IWR vote and her enthusiastic support for neo-con policies since then. Wilson is dismissive of Obama for not being part of the Washington inner circle, despite his spot-on assessment of the situation, yet full of praise for someone who WAS part of it and SHOULD have known better. If Sen. Clinton wants to use her experience as First Lady in her campaign, then it's only fair to question why she failed to remember that the people promoting the war were same PNAC creeps who tried to get her husband to attack Iraq back in the late '90s. Wilson should be aware of this too. I can only conclude that he assumes she's going to be the inevitable nominee and he wants a good position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #38
75. I fail to see why
hillary gets a pass from all those who have endorsed her? It's Twilight Zone but then what hasn't been in our government.. for a long time?

I hope all of those who sniff "inevitabilty" with hillary are left wondering.."What Happened?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #24
42. Win some lose some? Is that how you feel about the population of an entire country?
I dont believe that Hampster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #23
39. She would have none of that... political postering at the expense of killing innocent people...
...was more important to her.

After all, Bill was for the war and supported Bush. Oh wait... hold on...um... it depends what the meaning of "war" is...

:crazy:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #23
46. well, Valery Plame believed Saddam had WMD at the time
Maybe you should read her book.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-22-07 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #46
85. At the time of what? Wilson went to Niger in Feb. 2002. IWR was Oct. 2002.
He had plenty of time to brief her about that. The supposed Niger yellowcake was a big factor in the decision to go to war. Maybe you should go back and look at the timeline of events.

Oh and :eyes: right backatcha.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CyberPieHole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
27. Thanks for posting that, NewHampster....
I love Joe Wilson and I am pleased to know where he stands. Obviously, it is not with Obama and his sympathizers. Obama has too much to learn and the Presidency should not be on-the-job-training.

:kick: and recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
30. This ought to be posted on deperatehillaryattacks.com
she has "deep and vital expereince?"

In what???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #30
37. Do you have another line?
:cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry:me an f'n river
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. NO, This is his broken record of the day
Edited on Fri Dec-21-07 05:59 PM by durrrty libby
He figures if he says it enough times, he will believe his own "tripe"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #41
69. No, I mean can you cut me another?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
35. Thanks Joe for pointing out how you thought the war Hillary voted for was STUPID
Edited on Fri Dec-21-07 05:46 PM by zulchzulu
I'll give you that.

Otherwise, what was Obama supposed to do? Walk up to you and say he was against the war like MILLIONS of us were? The line was pretty goddamn long.

Obama saw through the bullshit, just like you.

Your Goldwater Girl didn't....or she'd rather send thousands to their deaths and spend trillions to look cheap-steak tough...and look "presidential".

Girls can send the Kids to Endless War too!

Sheesh....Joe. I hope you can look at yourself in the mirror.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
40. More of a sneer than an endorsement
What is it about Team Restoration that turns otherwise good people into run-of-the-mill hacks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
44. Is Joe Wilson still a Republican? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
47. Valery wrote in her book that she believed Saddam still had WMD
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
49. What is a Clinton surrogate supposed to say? That Hillary's IWR and Kyl-Lieberman votes were BS?
Edited on Fri Dec-21-07 07:23 PM by ClarkUSA
I'm waiting for him to wonder if Obama was a drug dealer... :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #49
52. He wasn't forced to endorse Clinton,
he could have chosen Obama...but he didn't. He also wasn't forced to make that statement...but he did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #52
55. So what? Like I said, what do we expect Clinton surrogates to do?
Edited on Fri Dec-21-07 07:25 PM by ClarkUSA
I'm only surprised Joe didn't include the words cocaine, madrassa, and Muslim in his statement. Guess it would look too obvious after Bill Shaheen's
"wondering" and Bob Kerrey's "compliment". :eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #55
56. So what?
I think Wilson's endorsement is valuable, but apparently you don't. I'm not surprised what you think about any of Clinton's supporters, luckily it's only your opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #56
58. Yeah, so what? All of Clinton's surrogates have attacked Obama lately. This is no different.
Edited on Fri Dec-21-07 07:30 PM by ClarkUSA
Of course, you think well of Wilson. You also defended Bill Shaheen nd Bob Kerrey, right? And it's not "only" my opinion. Many people
have got Hillaryworld surrogates' number down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #58
60. You've attacked anyone who's endorsed Clinton,
from Wes Clark to now Joe Wilson. I won't go any further trying to debate with you.

Good luck with Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #60
66. Yeah, Bob Kerrey did such a great job, didn't he?
I only point out the obvious. Only Clinton Kool-Aide drinkers and their apologists consider the truth to be equal to attacks. How Orwellian
of you. Next you'll say Bill Shaheen shouldn't have resigned.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #55
61. whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
:cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #61
68. Who do you support?
Let me guess.... the Queen of Parsing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #68
72. I don't know the Queen of which you speak.
My primary vote will go to Dennis Kucinich, why do you ask?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
51. Joe Wilson is a registered Republican
What a surprise. He endorses Hillary. Can Lieberman be far behind?
McCain for VP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. Let's not dump on the Wilsons ok.
The two of them blasted open the bush lies about the Niger yellowcake and Iraq's WMDs. They both were smeared and trashed by the bush/cheney thugs for it, our side shouldn't be trying to do the same in the name of politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #53
62. Agree. Man's a hero I don't care who's endorsing. I just don't have to follow his
advice on this one. But my respect for this couple remains.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #53
65. It's not a dump, it's statement of fact
He's not some liberal god, although he's one of the many unfortunate victims of the BFEE.

As a republican ( Not a Neocon) , it follows he would like Hillary .

I just suggest you consider the source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #65
67. So what does his being a republican have to do
with this statement? He was against the war before many liberal Democrats were, and he fought a public battle against it when others didn't. I respect what he has to say about this issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #51
57. Must be Bill's touting Bush I as a goodwill ambassador... Wilson worked for Poppy and admires him.
McCain for VP sounds about right... short of that, watch for her to pick another DLC corporate whore for VP (Evan Bayh, I'm guessing).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #57
64. This is trash. Shameful trash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #64
71. What's shameful trash is what Clinton surrogates have been shovelling lately...
Edited on Fri Dec-21-07 08:05 PM by ClarkUSA
I have no illusions as to which Mark Penn script Joe Wilson is reading from.

So much for his anti-Iraq war stance... his supporting neocon Hillary is a sell-out, as far as I'm concerned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-22-07 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #71
82. No. I don't care about either candidate. leave the Wilsons alone! There are better replies to this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
59. Too bad Hillary didn't even take the time to read the intelligence available to her at the time
Edited on Fri Dec-21-07 07:44 PM by flpoljunkie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #59
63. Now that's a well thought response! Brava!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
70. Now THAT is powerful!
and meaningful, too, considering the source!

Glad to recommend this one. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
desi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
74. K&R
for Joe AND Valerie Wilson...and of course our girl Hillary...

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnydrama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #74
76. i'm pretty sure
Joe Wilson voted for John Kerry.

I'm pretty sure John Dean is/was a Republican
I'm pretty sure Bruce Fein is/was a Republican

That doesn't stop us from praising them for their comments about Bush's anti constitution agenda.

Now all of a sudden, Joe Wilson is just another Republican.

I don't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
desi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #76
77. I sincerely doubt that Wilson would have voted for Bush...
even if he was a Republican. As a matter of fact I believe he was a close Kerry adviser. And yes, Bruce Fein is one of the good guys, a rare Republican who cares more for the rule of law than his party and Bushco.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
78. obama smooth talker but in reality, says NOTHING!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-22-07 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
79. I really like Joe Wilson...
...and I respect him.

However, I don't agree with him AT ALL on his assessment of Hillary or his
mis-characterization of Ob ama.

That's ok. You can really appreciate someone, politically--and respect them.

That doesn't mean you have to agree with every single thing they say.

I don't agree with Joe Wilson on Hillary. If he likes lima beans, I don't
agree with that either.

Next.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewHampster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-22-07 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #79
80. me loves Lima beans
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-22-07 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #79
86. It's a common logical fallacy known as Appeal to Authority
It's why companies use celebrities to endorse their products. It's also why I pay little attention to political endorsements, no matter how prominent the endorser is. I've seen way too many of them being done as political favors to give them much credibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-22-07 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
81. Steve Clemons of The Washington Note-Differences Between are 10-15%
In the end, the travel and foreign policy records of Clinton and Obama may prove over-scrutinized. As Clemons notes, the differences between the Democrats pale in comparison to those that exist between Democrats and Republicans.

"Hillary is on Armed Service Committee and has traveled all over the world," Clemons told the Huffington Post. "Barack has been an attentive member of the Foreign Relations Committee. There are differences between them but they are 10 to 15 percent difference. Whereas, the differences between the Obama or Hillary and Rudy or Huckabee are a 40 to 60 percent difference, just a staggering jump."

-snip
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2007/12/21/joe-wilson-rips-obama-ig_n_77921.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-22-07 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
83. So What If He'd Never Heard of Obama?
before his senate run? What does that have to do with anything?

Joe wants a job in the Hillary administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewHampster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-22-07 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #83
84. I wouldn't sneeze at a job either
What's wrong with that?

:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-22-07 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #84
87. Nuthing, But
now he can't get a job in the Obama administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 04:05 AM
Response to Original message
88. Great article!!!
A number of us, like then Illinois state senator Obama, opposed the second Gulf War. My own opposition from the beginning has been well documented. I fought the fight in the arena itself, Washington DC, against a ruthless administration and its supporters while the senator’s opposition came from a far distance and carried no risk, given that he represented in Springfield, Illinois the district encompassing the University of Chicago. As an obscure but safe provincial political figure, he never was granted access to the distorted intelligence that was used to drive the Congress and the media. When I looked to the left or to the right for support, I never saw the state senator. In fact, I never heard of Barack Obama until he announced his intention to run for the Senate in the 2006 election.

After he came to Washington, Obama’s views were thoroughly conventional and even timid. In 2004, he said about the 2002 congressional Authorization for the Use of Military Force: “I’m not privy to Senate intelligence reports. What would I have done? I don’t know.” On Iraq-related votes in the Senate, Obama’s record identically matches Senator Clinton’s–with the exception that Senator Clinton voted against the confirmation of General George Casey as Army chief of staff. Obama’s vote was typically passive.

I particularly liked this line: "As an obscure but safe provincial political figure, he never was granted access to the distorted intelligence that was used to drive the Congress and the media. When I looked to the left or to the right for support, I never saw the state senator. In fact, I never heard of Barack Obama until he announced his intention to run for the Senate in the 2006 election.

Too true, too true!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewHampster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #88
90. True but I doubt bamadroids will read the article
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-23-07 04:30 AM
Response to Original message
89. It didn't take someone with access to intelligence at the time to understand that *
Edited on Sun Dec-23-07 04:30 AM by Skidmore
was trying to sell a war and was going to go to war. How many times have we had this discussion on these boards. Lots of us out here watched * and his bunch inflate the information presented to the world as evidence of doom. We heard the inspectors talk about not finding anything and the rhetoric did not match the evidence. The evidence was flimsy at best. This is an insult to the intelligence of all people who were not afraid to call the emporer naked at the time. I don't consider those IWR votes to be acts of courage. At the time they were orchestrated by a legislative body intent on sweeping what was considered to be a brief campaign ala Gulf War II under the carpet before the next election. I call bullshit. There were so few in Congress who had the courage to stand up when it counted, and Hillary was not one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC