Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Thom Hartmann call in straw poll ...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Hieronymus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 02:10 PM
Original message
Thom Hartmann call in straw poll ...
Edited on Thu Dec-20-07 02:34 PM by Hieronymus
Edwards 38
Kucinich 27
Hillary 4
Obama 3
Biden 1
Dodd 2
Richardson 2
Carter 1
Gore 1
Ron Paul 1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. expect the Hillary-ites
to quickly discount this poll-they did the same thing yesterday with a Daily Kos poll I posted-that Edwards ALSO won....don't tell the MSM that a LOT of progressives actually believe him to be our best candidate with the best chance to win-you hardly ever even hear his name mentioned. It's always Clinton and Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. As a "Hillary-ite"
first off .... kiss my ass for that remark.

Second - I don't buy the polls either. I listen to Hartman everyday and I've been very impressed at the numbers Edwards gets. A local radio station did the same and Edwards won as well.

This "Hillary-ite" doesn't buy the bullshit the media reports.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. here's and example from yesterday

1. this poll is about as real as the zogby interactive poll.....

5. Hell, anyone can glance at those numbers and see how
skewed they are. If you believe that poll, I've got a bridge to sell ya.

FYI, every national poll has Obama and Clinton leading with Edwards pulling a (not so) distant third.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kucinich4America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. What's wrong with Hartmann's poll?
Do you know how it works?

You call in, he says your area code, and takes your vote. That's it. totally random. If all the calls were coming from the same area code for the same candidate, then that might look suspicious. If the Edwards campaign actually has a nationwide coordinated call in campaign every single week, then good for them for being able to pull that off. But somehow I doubt that's the case.

The Media whore illusion of Clinton vs Obama (and nobody else matters) is just that. An illusion. I still don't know a single person in the "real world" who is supporting Hillary, though I do know some who are considering Obama, or Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. yea I was responding to the one above me K4A
and you're right-I don't know anybody down here in Florida who has anything kind to say about her either
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #8
20. I am strongly pro-Edwards, but Hartmann's poll is based on a
convenience sample -- whoever calls in -- it is not a random sample by any stretch of the imagination.

Further, it is highly like the sample is biased. Thom really, really like Edwards and has said so on air - people who like Edwards are more likely to call because they expect that Thom will approve of their choice. Also, any loyal Hartmann listeners are likely to lean toward Edwards because Thom's very best insights about what is wrong with our nation match nicely with Edwards' positions -- so Thom's fans are likely to also be fans of Edwards.

I hope Edwards has more support than is currently evident in the national polls - I think he might, but I don't know how much more...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. Ahhh, its Air America.
....enough said.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hieronymus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Ha Ha .. skewed? These are real progressives, and they like Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. But you're willing to buy everything that Hillary feeds you? what a shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #14
30. Hillary is fast becoming more like a Cult than a Candidate with some people.
It's like a State Of Mind.

I hate to break it to some. She is NOT the Second Coming Of Christ.

She isn't even the Second Coming Of Bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
29. You petulant little ones never miss the chance to spew some sort of derogatory insult do you?
This is just getting sad. The level of discourse you guys are bringing to the table is getting quite childish.

See if you can make your point without having to resort to some kind of sandbox invitation to kiss your ass, go fuck ourselves, or whatever other tired insults you have in your arsenals.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. and Thom's cat got two votes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
21. Higgins for President!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. VP Edwards will be getting my primary vote here in the great state of MI
He, and, to a lesser extent, Obama, are the only two who have a chance to actually make the right wing irrelevant over the next 8 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonRB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Unfortunately, Edwards will not be on the Michigan ballot
Your best bet is to vote "uncommitted."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kucinich4America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Isn't the Michigan ballot basically useless?
I thought they were "disqualified" for moving up their primary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonRB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Basically, yes
Although the powers that be around here don't think the DNC will follow through and not seat our delegates. I think they just may.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. Edwards always kicks ass in that poll
I've been listening since the first time he did it. And my bet would be that if Kucinich voters picked a number two, at least half, if not more, would be picking Edwards as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #7
33. You are correct
Thom has done this poll *numerous* times (twice that I've heard personally) and the results are usually JRE and the Kooch at the top.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Steely_Dan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
13. You Forgot...
the two votes for Thom's cat.

-P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
15. interesting that they use the last name for the males, but the first name for the female
What a bunch of sexist crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlyingSquirrel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I've noticed that too... I always use "Clinton" myself.
Edited on Thu Dec-20-07 11:50 PM by FlyingSquirrel
Even though she's my 2nd to last choice, I feel that it is disrespectful. (Mainly to her supporters. I don't have very much respect for her, but since her supporters are people I'm associating with daily on this board I prefer to maintain some kind of comity.) Her detractors usually use her first name. I think a lot of people just don't like the name. It's not that common anymore. I bet if her first name was "Michelle" people wouldn't be using it as much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. Actually, Hillary wants you to call her Hillary

Or she wouldn't have the name Hillary on all her bumper stickers.

http://www.votehillarypresident.org/

Also, see my other post on this subject.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. Thank you Quixote - Hillary wants to be called Hillary...
because she needs to distinguish herself from Bill as an independent, capable leader. I think it is also because she knows that a lot of us (me and others) are really, really distressed about the Presidential dynasties that are emerging - Bush, Clinton, Bush, Clinton,...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlyingSquirrel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. I figured she did.. But I noticed that her bashers NEVER use "Clinton"
My senator, Patty Murray, prefers to go by "Patty" too and has a link saying "Ask Patty". I personally think that is not very dignified for a senator, but on the other hand the more I see them on the floor of the senate the less I respect them regardless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #25
31. I wrestle with the use of formal titles -- it does remind us that
some people have reached their position because they've worked hard and deserve respect. And I really do see that it is very, very useful to use a formal title when someone is, as a result of prejudice, generally disrespected - women, ethnic or religious minorities. I have very mixed feelings, still.

For example: I am a 40-something woman who teaches at a university. If I don't ask my students to call me "Dr. IndyOp" then they call me "Ms." or "Mrs." and I end up being treated as if I am one of their high school teachers instead of a professor. Almost NEVER are male faculty members called "Mr." -- students always call them "Dr. Name" even if they don't have a doctoral degree. OFTEN female faculty are called "Ms." or "Mrs." -- and it irks me. Still, I have mixed feelings about asking students to use my title because the use of formal titles reinforces an authoritarian mentality that I despise. We have to distinguish between "just authority" and "unjust authority" and to treat just authority with respect - including the formal title. Failing to use the formal title is an appropriate sign of disrespect to an unjust authority.

It is however a catch-22. Women politicians who use their first names are, in some ways, forced to do so for marketing purposes. Males and females respond in a more disciplined fashion to instructions given by men -- dad, male teacher, boss, politician. Males and females expect females in authority - mom, teacher, boss, politician - to lead by creating an emotional connection and cajoling people into co-operating. What you wind up with is that the style that is more effective is different for men and women:

Males with authoritarian (masculine) leadership style are more effective than males with co-operative (feminine) leadership style.

Women with co-operative (feminine) leadership style are more effective than women with authoritarian (masculine) leadership style.

Women who communicate that they are co-operative leaders by using their first names will get further with voters - particularly for high (glass ceiling) offices.

I would really rather have a female VP before we have a female Pres -- I think that the media, males and females, will rip a female Pres to shreds before and during her time in office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlyingSquirrel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. You think they won't rip 'em as VP? Think Ferrarro...
My daughter's principal (female) goes by "Dr. Stewart". At first it put me off but once I saw how well she ran the school it actually gave me more respect for her than she might have gotten with just "Ms." or "Mrs." On the other hand, if I had disapproved of her style, it might have made me think she was a cast-iron you know what. However, when my daughter was in kindergarten her principal went by "Ms. Zoe", Zoe being her first name. That was interesting, but she had it in for my daughter so I disliked her no matter what.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #32
34. I remember Ferrarro -- and to be clear about where I am coming from
I should say that I don't want Hillary to be Pres or VP. I do think that a woman could be VP candidate and VP and not be ripped the same way that Ferrarro was ripped -- the glass ceiling has been raised since the time that she ran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hieronymus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #16
23. Her campaign ads refer to her as Hillary .. that should give you a clue.
Edited on Fri Dec-21-07 12:17 AM by Hieronymus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. I heard Karl Rove on the Sean Hannity show yesterday
saying that Clinton has worked to get people to call her Hillary because it sounds more personal. Thats why they put Hillary instead of Clinton on her bumper stickers. Seems the person you should blame for this is Hillary and not your fellow DUers. Rove said that Republicans should call her "Senator Clinton" which sounds less personal.


See here: http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=&imgrefurl=http://www.votehillarypresident.org/&h=105&w=200&sz=4&hl=en&start=11&um=1&tbnid=yWwVqzB7Jz_KgM:&tbnh=55&tbnw=104&prev=/images%3Fq%3DHillary%2BClinton%2Bbumper%2Bstickers%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26sa%3DN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDoorbellRang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #15
26. That's always irritated me, too
'nuff said
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. Blame Hillary then
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-21-07 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #15
28. Then Hillary is a sexist


Do you want me to find her campaign signs from 2006?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenTea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-20-07 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
17. Who would be so ignorant as to vote for a republican?
Edited on Thu Dec-20-07 11:56 PM by GreenTea
Paul is, has been and always will be a republican party supporting clown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC