Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anyone here who mentiones Dean and nader together is a plant

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ursacorwin Donating Member (528 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 09:41 AM
Original message
Anyone here who mentiones Dean and nader together is a plant
and anyone who advocates for nader here is a plant or a fool.

first off: dean, whatever else you may think of him, was a people's candidate. he rose and fell on the strength of younger, motivated, "angry," and first time campaigners. it was the real deal of american democracy, and it failed largely in part because america is no longer a democracy. but no sense crying over spilled milk, dean supporters have learned from this experience and will not go away. for the greatest part, they will vote Dem in the fall and continue to give (albiet perhaps less) to liberal and democratic causes towards unseating bush. the people made dean, real people with all the human flaws, and that's a good thing. dean supporters are not and never have been associated with nader supporters, except for those who came to the deann campaign in search of what nader promised, but never delivered.

second: this hysteria about nader is really silly. and a waste of time, as well as a distraction. if you honestly think nader has any chance of winning, you're hopelessly naive or not paying attention. if you think nader will "send a message" to some group of democrats already in office or running the party, well- i can't deny the possibility, but i'm fairly sure that a much more important message comes from you, in the form of your SUPPORTIVE vote in the fall. sadly, it may be true that the most important voices in Dem ears these days are corporate interests, but that's what we're all trying to change. but if you think that any dem anywhere will make a decision because of your "protest vote" for nader in the fall, you're greatly overestimating your importance.

finally: let's look at the facts. nader has never held public office. nader has been rejected by many greens, persons and party alike. nader has essentially been off the media radar for the last three years- all rife with opportunities to make hay for his supposed favorite causes. nader meets with Satan's own hellspawn Grover Norquist in DC in the Wednesday group of far-right rethugs. nader himself has disturbingly rethug like habits with it comes to how he runs his corporations (he has them) and invests his considerable personal fortune. nader is part of an educational elite that includes rummy and other cabal insiders. nader has used rethug favorite lawyers and campaign activists in the past to help get him on the ballot. in short: nader walks, talks, and acts like the very people we hate the most in his day to day life.

if you're young and enthusiastic about liberal causes, educate yourself before thinking that nader represents any real opportunity to affect change. tin-foil or no, it's only reciting history to say that in this country, the rethugs have a LONG history of playing the left off the left/center with planted candidates, fake organizations, and disrupters. all the nader threads here tell me we've got a lot more of those than i thought, as well as a lot of people who are more easily distracted than i thought. nader is a NON-ISSUE and he's designed to make you forget about what really matters, and to confuse you about who is actually working for your causes. wake up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Shoedogg Donating Member (515 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Nader fans, read this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spoon Donating Member (401 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. Does that mean you're a plant?
Just askin!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Wait a minute!
Yeah! You mentioned Dean and Nader together in the same post!

Ahh! So did I! ACK!! :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Panda1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Heh heh.....
I'm a vegetable. :P (Time for that second cup of coffee on the left coast!)
A letter to CNN this morning just said, "Ralph Nader should hurl himself off the edge off a cliff in a Corvair." Hahahaha
Well, I might be a boomer, but fluffy cloud being help me, Soledad O'Brien (WTF were her parents thinking?) said, "I wonder what he means by that?" :crazy:
Arrrrrrrrrrggggggggghhhhhhhhh! COFFEE NOW!!!!!!!!! :donut:

DAMN! Look at all this free air time the INSANE Vader is getting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snivi Yllom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. DEAN NADER
DEAN NADER
DEAN NADER
DEAN NADER
DEAN NADER
DEAN NADER

satisfied?

I can easily argue that the current frontrunners in the Democratic primaries would offer little in the way of change even if they won.

Im sorry you think having principle and clinging with a deathgrip to issues passionate to your heart makes you a "plant or a fool".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodrowFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I can easily argue
Edited on Mon Feb-23-04 10:02 AM by WoodrowFan
"I can easily argue that the current frontrunners in the Democratic primaries would offer little in the way of change even if they won."


And I can argue that the Earth was created by a huge turtle named "Bob" using used paper cups.

Anyone who can't tell the major differences between Kerry/Edwards and bush isn't paying attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atlant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Ahh. Bush wanted war, but Kerry and Edwards *VOTED* for war.
I see the difference clearly.

Atlant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Totally Without Merit
Some folks cling to the view that the invasion of Iraq could have been stopped by a vote in the Senate. It could not have been. Therefore the cry of "enabler" is hollow and false.

The fact is that the invasion of Iraq is the responsibility of the criminals of the 2000 Coup who conceived, pressed, and executed the act, and of no other. The only thing that "enabled" them is the structure and practice of governance. It has a nice sound, the line you press, but it is a false and misguided line, that will produce no good result.

I understand your sentiments and frustration, I really do. I urge you to act in a way that will remove the criminals from the White House, not in a way that empowers them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atlant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. Please read the Constitution.
The fact that the Congress has abdicated its responsibility does not
mean that the responsibility does not still lie there.

Aside from "Declarations of War", all they'd need to do is withhold
the money for the war and the war would not have occurred. Even the
Pentagon can't shift hundreds of billions of dollars around "off
budget".

Atlant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. Sheer Fantasy To Think That Would Ever Happen
The IWR was a meaningless exercise. No matter HOW the vote had turned out, the invasion of Iraq would have taken place, on the military and political schedule desired Bush* and his cabal.

The sole responsibility for the invasion of Iraq lies with the person who conceived, pressed, and executed the policy, and with no other person whatever.

The war-mongers are the CRIMINALS of the 2000 Coup, and nobody else.

The IWR had all the elements of a political trap. If enough Democrats had voted against it, then the ENTIRE PARTY would be slurred as being "soft" and seeking to tie the hands of Our Great Leader seeking to defend the country against Satan himself. The great majority of Americans would have rallied to that cry.

This line was launched anyway, but without the effect nationwide it would have had, had the vote been much closer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atlant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. If you say so. But I don't have to vote for an enabler.
And by voting *FOR* the IWR, Kerry and Edwards didn't even provide
the slightest resistance to Bush, they simply enabled him.

They are both undeserving of my vote in 2004 and neither one
will get my support or my vote.

Atlant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #15
21. Your reading of the Constitution is wrong
which is why Congress hasn't declared war since WWII.

And apparently you are not aware that Republicans control both houses of Congress. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atlant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. I'm sorry, I thought the House voted the finances. (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #10
28. It doesn't matter whether they could've STOPPED the war
They voted FOR it -- they are complicit. Their hands are stained in blood, and continue to be stained with blood with each new day's death total. They didn't have the guts to stand for what was right over what was politically expedient.

On THIS issue, they are no better than the man who took us to war because they wouldn't stand up against it.

*I* knew, well in advance, that invading Iraq was 99% likely a sure thing no matter what. That doesn't excuse them for:

* validating Bush's pre-emptive war doctrine by virtue of their vote
* surrendering their Constitutional duty and thereby strengthening Bush's power
* standing for an illegal, immoral, unjustified and unjustifiable war EVEN IF THEY COULDN'T SINGLEHANDEDLY STOP IT.

There IS no viable excuse for voting Yes on that resolution. None. And never will be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atlant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Right. They DIDN'T EVEN TRY to stop the war. (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snivi Yllom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. oh yeah
"And I can argue that the Earth was created by a huge turtle named "Bob" using used paper cups."

OK, you use Dr. Seuss as your source, I will use the voting records of the front runners.

I can live with that.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burning bush Donating Member (539 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. Right! "Kerry" has all these different letters in his name
and... uhm

Oh Yeah, Bush didn't vote for the IWR!

well...it's true :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
5. I voted for Nader
I think that Dean was our best bet to run inbetween Bush and Nader.
Nothing against Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
12. fruit or vegetable?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomKoolzip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
13. Great post. Thanks for that.
Really, people....where is the unity I thought we had finally won? Don't you understand that voting Nader is EXACTLY what the Bush cabal wants you to do?

Alll these people who continually claim that there's no difference between the parties should ask themselves why the republicans spend so much time and money demonizing the same Dem politicians we call "pink tutu Dems" for free. If that's just a facade, it's a pretty expensive facade to maintain. Just go to FR sometime anbd see how gleeful they are that Nader's back in the race....You realize, of course, that supporting Nader makes freepers happy, makes republicans happy, and enables Bush to implement his plans for instigating "the end times?!" Let's remember that Bush is A FUNDAMENTALIST. He WANTS armaggeddon. And he's prepared to send ALL OF US to death for his ideological stance....just as all the Nader/third party voters are (probably unconciously) prepared to allow him to do it for THEIR ideological stance. This REALLY isn't so hard to figure out, guys....this is the most important GE since I don't know when. This GE will decide whether our country has a future.

If you want to support a Green or third party candidate, PLEASE go to the local elections to do that. I almost ALWAYS vote Green in local elections, because I too want my voice heard, and I too want Dems to listen to my dissastifaction with the political process.

But this General Election is FAR too important to be playing ideological brinksmanship games.

Come ON, guys! This shit is getting stupid. I thought we werwe all unified here! I thought we all knew the consequences of voting third party in the GE! It's sad that we should even be talking about this right now....plus, imagine the happiness on the faces of Rove, etc. when the see intercene bickering again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atlant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. Your unity went the same place my unity went.
Edited on Mon Feb-23-04 11:46 AM by Atlant
> Really, people....where is the unity I thought we had finally won?

Your unity went the same place my unity went. Back in November, the
Democrats had a candidate who could have unified the Party. But he
wasn't the candidate that some certain Democrats were behind, so
rather than "unifying" behind this candidate, they set out to
politically assassinate him. And it worked.

Now, their preferred candidate is in front, and suddenly they want
"unity" and a stop to all political assassinations or even skirmishes.

Too bad; it didn't happen in November and it ain't gonna happen now.

Atlant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomKoolzip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. So you'd rather shout "sour grapes" than beat Bush?
Very adult.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atlant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. As I have explained countless times before...
> Very adult.

Feel free to hurl names at me. Rest assured that they will have no,
zero, zip, nada effect on my vote in November. But perhaps the hurling
will make you feel better; heaven knows that Kerry makes me want to
hurl!


> So you'd rather shout "sour grapes" than beat Bush?

As I have explained countless times before, I believe our most urgent
task is to radically transform the Democratic Party *AWAY* from the
DLC-led milquetoast stances that sound like "We're just like Bush, only
smarter and nicer" and back to stances that actually *STAND* for
something (such as being *FOR* human rights, *FOR* women's rights,
*FOR* worker rights over Corporate rights, *AGAINST* unjust
invasions of sovereign foreign nations, etc.).

Defeating Bush is *NOT* my A-Number-One goal, although it would be a
"nice to have". Transforming the Democrats is my A-Number-One goal.
And if that goal fails, the Democrats will continue to lose election
after election, even if they happen to re-gain the Presidency in 2004.

Atlant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BL_Zebub Donating Member (473 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
14. Just for the record
Grover Norquist does NOT work for me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
16. ... Or A Shrub.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
18. How about the multitude of longtime users with Dean avatars
who are advocating for Nader? Are they plants?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. funny
I haven't seen much sign of Dean supporters chosing Nader, never mind a multitude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. Maybe they just seem like a multitude because
they are shouting so loudly.

I have no doubt that the overwhelming majority of Dean supporters are more intelligent than that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
26. together?
You mean like as a couple or in a Mexican Knife fight?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC