|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
quinnox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:11 PM Original message |
Why Should Obama's past be exempt? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Franc_Lee (287 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:13 PM Response to Original message |
1. because Bush's was... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bullet1987 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:13 PM Response to Original message |
2. What are you Hillary supporters talking about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:13 PM Response to Original message |
3. Here you go again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
swag (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:15 PM Response to Original message |
4. It shouldn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bobbieo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:27 PM Response to Reply #4 |
19. If the pressure gets too much - and it will - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
swag (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:41 PM Response to Reply #19 |
37. You have no idea what you're talking about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:16 PM Response to Original message |
5. I wondered the same thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quinnox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:21 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. thanks, I agree totally |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:30 PM Response to Reply #5 |
22. I wouldn't say that 20 is "long past youthful indiscretions" - 30 is still youthful these days... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:32 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. how do you know he spoke truthful in his book? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:35 PM Response to Reply #24 |
28. We don't know how other candidates have broken the law either... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:37 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. Well, we do have information on Obama--at least some information |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:38 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. I think the voters can ask, and the other campaigns too... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BenDavid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:40 PM Response to Reply #5 |
36. EE, you are right on target. HRC is the most investigated woman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quinnox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:46 PM Response to Reply #36 |
46. BenDavid is right on target |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Windy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 05:07 PM Response to Reply #5 |
65. You idiots should get out there and campaign legitimately for your candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:16 PM Response to Original message |
6. Nothing IS exempt. For any of them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MannyGoldstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:16 PM Response to Original message |
7. What Do You Propose To Do About It? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:18 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Dont ask that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quinnox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:20 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. nothing Im just wondering why talking about it seems to be off limits |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:20 PM Response to Original message |
9. Get this through your head: It's simply not a big fucking deal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:21 PM Original message |
how do you define "kid" Cali? What if he was 20? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:27 PM Original message |
He's said he only did it when he was in high school |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:31 PM Response to Original message |
23. his aid stated he was "around 20" when he stopped doing cocaine. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:38 PM Response to Reply #23 |
31. baloney. that's too old. As the mother of a 21 year old |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:39 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. Bush was drunk under a bar stool while Kerry was risking his life |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:46 PM Response to Reply #33 |
45. How do you know it wasn't 19? And so what if it was 21 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:50 PM Response to Reply #45 |
48. You are wrong...I would like to know the facts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:56 PM Response to Reply #48 |
52. He doesn't owe you or any other prospective voter anymore than |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:44 PM Response to Reply #23 |
43. And how are the Repubs. able to use that against him when BUSH considered FORTY to be in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quinnox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:23 PM Response to Reply #9 |
15. but that is your opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:29 PM Response to Reply #15 |
20. Doesn't seem to bother too many dems, does it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:36 PM Response to Reply #20 |
29. It has not been an issue--no one knows about it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quinnox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:40 PM Response to Reply #29 |
34. yup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:41 PM Response to Reply #34 |
39. wrong. people know. And he'll be fine if he's the nominee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quinnox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:43 PM Response to Reply #39 |
40. I disagree completely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:40 PM Response to Reply #29 |
35. wrong. I live in Vermont. Obama made a speech about his drug |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:41 PM Response to Reply #35 |
38. you know cali: i think we can discuss this without your little snarky quips. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:43 PM Response to Reply #38 |
41. Oh please. All I said was that you're wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:46 PM Response to Reply #41 |
47. No. That is not all you said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:51 PM Response to Reply #47 |
49. and I suggest you stop being so sensitive and reconsider |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:55 PM Response to Reply #49 |
50. there you go--spinning and distorting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 05:00 PM Response to Reply #50 |
57. with ease. with great ease. It's obvious that you're insinuating |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 05:04 PM Response to Reply #57 |
62. I was going to say something |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 05:13 PM Response to Reply #62 |
68. passive aggressive is not a positive attribute. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:45 PM Response to Reply #35 |
44. That was on the national and local news here in the DFW area too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:56 PM Response to Reply #44 |
51. DU is not mainstream |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:58 PM Response to Reply #51 |
53. Agreed, but someone who's a member of DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:59 PM Response to Reply #53 |
54. Again--he keeps bringing it up in vague references |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 05:02 PM Response to Reply #54 |
59. Wait, he brought it up once a few weeks ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYCGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 05:02 PM Response to Reply #54 |
60. These are hardly vague references: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmavm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:21 PM Response to Original message |
12. He was a KID. We all do stuff when we're kids that we wouldn't do as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Franc_Lee (287 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:21 PM Response to Original message |
13. A few years ago this may have made a difference. Ask the boomers about drugs...(Woodstock crowd) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:23 PM Response to Original message |
14. I wasn't aware that ObamaCo said that it should be exempt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annie1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:24 PM Response to Original message |
16. imo it was how it was brought up that was the problem... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:26 PM Original message |
Only Hillary's past should be attackable. Obama deserves a free pass. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
R_M (425 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:26 PM Response to Original message |
17. Because he's Barack Obama. He's the "chosen" one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Franc_Lee (287 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:27 PM Response to Original message |
18. Barack Obama the people's choice, it's only a mateer of time...sheeeesh!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bobbieo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:35 PM Response to Reply #18 |
27. More than once, I have seen the 'people's choice' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elizm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:30 PM Response to Original message |
21. Who said it was exempt? He has addressed it. It's those who want to beat it to death... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:32 PM Response to Original message |
25. I wouldn't think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zueda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:33 PM Response to Original message |
26. So we should discourage our pols from telling the truth? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
antiimperialist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:43 PM Response to Original message |
42. How is cocaine use that stopped decades ago relevant to the ability to govern? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 04:59 PM Response to Original message |
55. quinnox, you are unfairly making all Hillary supporters look bad with your pursuit of this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sniffa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 05:02 PM Response to Reply #55 |
58. shhh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quinnox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 05:03 PM Response to Reply #55 |
61. No, many Hillary supporters happen to agree with me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sniffa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 05:00 PM Response to Original message |
56. exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeepBlueC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 05:05 PM Response to Original message |
63. The Rethugs will not let Obama's drug use pass |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quinnox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 05:07 PM Response to Reply #63 |
64. I agree with you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 05:31 PM Response to Reply #63 |
70. the rethugs are not going to vote for him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackintheGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 05:09 PM Response to Original message |
66. I'm so glad to see that our candidates are not allowed any mistakes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jakem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 05:13 PM Response to Original message |
67. what was HRC doing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 05:29 PM Response to Original message |
69. how are we to do to force him to "face the music"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-15-07 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
71. See video of former Clinton IA precinct captain who quit in disgust over Hillary's attacks on Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 01st 2024, 09:31 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC