Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Where were the Clintons when our govt started sending our jobs overseas?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Zueda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 01:21 PM
Original message
Where were the Clintons when our govt started sending our jobs overseas?
Oh....wait. nevermind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Progress And Change Donating Member (617 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. you mean when 22 million jobs were created?
They were in the White House during that era of peace and prosperity...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zueda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. You can keep your Walmart-like jobs!
I'm talking real manufacturing jobs backed by unions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. No government jobs
were sent overseas..You confuse facts ....Corporate Jobs were outsourced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. it wasn't a clinton administration official who said that outsourcing was good for our economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. median income rose too under Clinton
so nope - not Wal-Mart jobs to any significant degree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snotcicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. median? or average? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #18
26. as I said...median. NT
,h
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. Oh, you mean those "Would you like paper or plastic" jobs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. voting for NAFTA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. And, you only "buy American"? If not ,you are also culpable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zueda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I do not buy at Walmart...
Edited on Sat Dec-08-07 01:43 PM by Zueda
As to say buy American only well...that's can of hard now isn't it! And who do you think made that happen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. You folks have no doubt heard about Clinton selling missile technology to China.
That one always confused me until I was able to piece it together.

Under Clinton, permission was given for one of the gov't contractors to send the manufacture of a component of a guidance system to China. The assumption is that this component was "reverse engineered" by the Chinese. However, there is absolutely no evidence or suggestion that the Chinese were able to do anything with this incomplete information on missile guidance.

This doesn't exactly amount to "selling missile technology to China", but you get the point.

And, it was a case of jobs going abroad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. Signing the paperwork. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
10. Same place Al Gore was
Maybe we should have voted for Perot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zueda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I did in fact vote Perot....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. Figures
DSB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
13. A better question is where was Obama and why wasn't he speaking out?
Edited on Sat Dec-08-07 02:09 PM by Gman
He didn't even try to make a difference. Obviously he didn't care. Obama must have stood to make money off of NAFTA. Obama made millions while millions got laid off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. He was lecturing at the University of Chicago Law School.
Did you forget your sarcasm smilie? Sometimes it's hard to tell here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zueda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Let's see...
As an associate attorney with Miner, Barnhill & Galland from 1993 to 1996, he represented community organizers, discrimination claims, and voting rights cases. He was a lecturer of constitutional law at the University of Chicago Law School from 1993 until his election to the U.S. Senate in 2004
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. IOW, he did nothing about jobs and trade
while the Clinton's policies created 22 million new jobs and the economy boomed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Thank you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Let's not forget the lowest poverty rates, teen pregnancy rates, abortion rates,
drug abuse rates, and the highest levels of home ownership, employment, income, etc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
14. In the Beltway, of course
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
20. Creating 22million new jobs, and revitalizing the economy of upstate NY
Glad you brought it up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
22. where were "progressives"* when GW Bush was being sworn in?
Hiding their "vote Nader" buttons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
23. Not gonna to get involved in
Edited on Sat Dec-08-07 03:10 PM by doc03
this discussion, not gonna do it, wouldn't be prudent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC