Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The U.S. Supreme Court - voting third party may fuck us for 40 years

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ringmastery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 08:02 PM
Original message
The U.S. Supreme Court - voting third party may fuck us for 40 years
I want to know if the people here who are thinking about voting third party know the ramifications of their actions.

O'Connor, Stevens, Rinquist, and Ginsburg are likely to retire within the next few years.

How would you like a supreme court made up of Thomas, Scalia, and 4 more right wing nutjobs?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Iverson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'd hate it, like I hate accomodating the far right.
The cure is to run a decent candidate, make the third party unnecessary, and not bend over for the criminals.

Just my opinion, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poskonig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. We don't have perfect candidates.
We were/are stuck with an aristocratic senator from Massachusetts, a boring moderate from Connecticut, a wildeyed former governor from a dinky state, a flower-power congressman from Ohio, and so forth. There is no Clinton that can unite everybody in this pack, but we don't have a moronic Dubya in there either.

The world isn't perfect, and politics is not beanbag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iverson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Let me mark my calendar.
no perfect candidates, you say?
world not perfect?
politics not beanbag?

(scribble, scribble)

The new things that one learns!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
25. One learns most by experience
scribble that one down too while you're at it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Good Lord, would not WANT another Clinton (Think Edwards can pull folks in
But give me the "flower power" of Kucinich. He's not that outrageously left in his convictions. You've just gotten used to the right-leaning middle we've had for the past few decades. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poskonig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Name five issues where Kucinich is conservative.
Kucinich isn't a moderate; he's a hardliner. Kerry isn't much different on most issues, which makes the ongoing Nader dialogue perplexing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. My issue is not with you calling Dennis a leftist
and no other than formerly being pro-life I can't give you those five issues. (And again he could still be further to the left, he is NOT off the charts by any means.)

I DO take issue with you trivializing him and his platform by calling it "flower power". You made it sound like being left leaning passe and pointless, which it is not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paulie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Please refine your question some more
I'll take a stab at answering if you define conservative for me. Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poskonig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Find 5 major issues where Kucinich agrees with Bush.
:beer:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fitzovich Donating Member (179 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Why not
I would take another Clinton - any day of the week
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Nafta, bad record on the environment, etc
Read Michael Moore's chapter on him in "Stupid White Men" and you'll get the picture why. :)

(This doesn't mean I would not take Slick Willy over $hrub, though, it means I would not take him over the other Dems running now.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Your opinion is shared by many others.
And once again, I must remind those who repeat the Supreme Court mantra that the DLC puppet they are blindly accepting voted to confirm Fat Tony Scalia, possibly the worst piece of shit to ever sit on a SCOTUS bench.

If Kerry wants to prove himself worthy of saving the judiciary, let's see what he does about Junior's recent disgusting "recess" appointments. Will he allow them to remain seated because it's easier than more hearings cutting into his campaign time? Will he bother to show up for the vote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SerpentX Donating Member (262 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Just so we're clear on this
That confirmation vote went 98-0.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ringmastery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. That's interesting
Why did Scalia get sworn in and not Bork? Weren't they the same?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. The recess appointments are in effect until 2005,
so I don't think that there will be any attempt to remove him before the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monte Carlo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. No party is going to accomidate everyone.
It is more than who's right. The criminals are powerful - they run the federal government and have lots of friends in the national media. We must stop fixating on past mistakes and focus more on the next few years. Kerry and Edwards have made mistakes, but Washington is Washington, and you can't win all the time. However many parties you have, no one party is going to get everything it wants, even the GOP today.

Is a third party vote really necessary to send the Democratic Party a message? Personally, I think even the DNC got the message from the Dean campaign - people are fed up and angry. He forced the other candidates to grow a spine to survive. I'd say a big message has already been sent. Even if you don't like either of Kerry or Edwards in the primaries, I think that your vote in the general election would be most effective if you directed it where the fight is going to be. Sauron needs to be defeated now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iverson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. sure
However, you are responding to different points than the one I raised.

Look around you on this board. Supposedly, we are constituted by the more left side of the Democratic Party and other progressives. People have learned nothing except how to become more entrenched in their positions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. Hate boot camp too? A draft will accomodate the far right's PNAC agenda.
There's much more at stake in this election than replacing a bunch of SCOTUS old fogeys.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iverson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. well then
It's time to run a pro-war, pro-economic globalization candidate. We'll give the right wing what they want until they cry "uncle!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. We know that Bush will see his election as a mandate to continue his "War
on Terrorism". With Edwards or Kerry it's not that cut and dried.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monte Carlo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't think this can be over emphasized.
The Supreme Court can set the tone for the government in the long-term. Justices are appointed for LIFE... and with modern medicine the way that it is, they can expect to live longer and longer. I heard that insurance companies peg the average life span in 30 or so years to be 110+ years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yep, it's scary..
Am amazed the liberal justices aren't mysteriously dropping like flies right now so that $hrubco can pack the courts already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PsN2Wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. No sure some of the Republican....
Supremes aren't concerned with what they foisted on the nation.
There was a lot of talk about O'Connor wanting to retire but not doing it while Clinton was in office. She doesn't seem to be in a hurry to retire now. Maybe prefer history not remembering her as helping the United States of America go to ruin through her partisan vote to overrule Florida Supreme Court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creativelcro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
21. I agree with you on this... But if that is what the Dem party
wants, that is what they get...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ozone_man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
22. DLC should have thought of that before alienating the left.
This argument may persuade some, but does not work for many left wing Democrats and Independents who are looking for real change. It sounds like a draft may be coming if Kerry is elected to add 40,000 troops. Perhaps more "Progressive Internationalism" wars instead of PNAC wars. I think Kerry and Bush serve the same master.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC