|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
jhrobbins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 02:42 PM Original message |
Are we going to support the Democratic candidate-regardless of who |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 02:43 PM Response to Original message |
1. Its Loyalty Oath Time Again Kids. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dhalgren (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 02:58 PM Response to Reply #1 |
19. I for one will not take a loyalty oath. Period. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1corona4u (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 03:42 PM Response to Reply #19 |
31. Yeah, and who might that be? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dhalgren (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 03:58 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. Let's draft Russ Feingold... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spirit of 34 (119 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 04:37 PM Response to Reply #33 |
57. You really think all DUers would support Feingold without equivocation? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dhalgren (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 09:58 PM Response to Reply #57 |
79. I guess I was throwing them a little "red" meat, as it were. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 09:56 AM Response to Reply #19 |
97. I for one will vote for our nominee. Even if it's Obama or Edwards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughBeaumont (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 04:01 PM Response to Reply #1 |
36. I'm partial to asparagus, myself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 04:22 PM Response to Reply #36 |
51. What would be funny is to watch the shitstorm if Dennis got nominated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 02:44 PM Response to Original message |
2. I am. I was a Clark supporter in 2004 but by the time Kerry was nominated... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 02:44 PM Original message |
I will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stop Cornyn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 02:44 PM Response to Original message |
3. Of course |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 02:45 PM Response to Original message |
4. I hope so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kutjara (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 02:45 PM Response to Original message |
5. I would vote for a dead haddock in preference to any Republican. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fresh_Start (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 02:46 PM Response to Original message |
6. I will even if I have to hold my nose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
question everything (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 02:47 PM Response to Original message |
7. Yes, unless one wants a repeat of 1968 and 2000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bpeale (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 04:54 PM Response to Reply #7 |
61. BLAH BLAH BLAH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 02:47 PM Response to Original message |
8. Yes nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riqster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 02:49 PM Response to Original message |
9. Oath, Schmoath |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 02:51 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Well said my Democratic friend. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
terrya (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 02:51 PM Response to Original message |
10. Yes, yes, a thousand times yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beaverhausen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 02:52 PM Response to Original message |
12. Of course I will support the nominee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kucinich4America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 02:53 PM Response to Original message |
13. Let me put it this way... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dbackjon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 02:58 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. So if Hillary gets the nomiination |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sniffa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 03:02 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. and that's gonna work wonders |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kucinich4America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 03:04 PM Response to Reply #18 |
23. So don't nominate Republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dbackjon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 03:07 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Attitudes like yours are why we lost in 2000 and 2004 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 03:40 PM Response to Reply #25 |
30. Spineless stand for nothing tweedledumism is why |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dbackjon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 03:58 PM Response to Reply #30 |
34. Wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kucinich4America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 04:11 PM Response to Reply #34 |
43. You're the one that is wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dbackjon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 04:27 PM Response to Reply #43 |
52. Pity for America than millions of voters are smart enough |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kucinich4America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 04:09 PM Response to Reply #25 |
40. I supported Gore in 2000 and Dean in 2004 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auntie Bush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 10:01 PM Response to Reply #40 |
80. That's a ridiculous statement...and you know it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kucinich4America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 11:56 PM Response to Reply #80 |
84. Is it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auntie Bush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 01:46 AM Response to Reply #84 |
85. I don't know anything about a blackwater thug |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 11:12 AM Response to Reply #84 |
104. Mark Penn does NOT represent Blackwater! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 09:01 AM Response to Reply #40 |
90. bwahaha |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
denem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 08:59 AM Response to Reply #13 |
89. Kucinich/Paul 08! nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dhalgren (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 02:54 PM Response to Original message |
14. I will vote my conscience. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughBeaumont (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 04:22 PM Response to Reply #14 |
50. I love how people think that WE'RE somehow at fault . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 02:55 PM Response to Original message |
15. I sure as hell hope all the malcontents out there will support my guy once he wins... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 02:57 PM Response to Original message |
16. yes. I will crawl through the proverbial broken glass next year |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hisownpetard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 02:58 PM Response to Original message |
17. I would vote for any living human being who is put forward by the Dem party, with the exception of: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sniffa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 02:59 PM Response to Original message |
20. that's incorrect actually |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 06:23 PM Response to Reply #20 |
116. Sniffa, I'm impressed. I remember in 2004 you really laid into me because I was pissed about IWR... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone_Wolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 03:03 PM Response to Original message |
22. Will the nominee stay loyal to their Democratic base |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perry Logan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 03:05 PM Response to Original message |
24. No. The anti-Clinton people proudly and repeatedly announce they won't vote for her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 03:10 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. I am an anti-Clinton one, but I will vote for her if she gets the nomination /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bpeale (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 04:58 PM Response to Reply #24 |
62. i'm not lieing. hillary? not now. not ever. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elizm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 07:43 PM Response to Reply #24 |
75. Not lying. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 03:09 PM Response to Original message |
26. anyone who does that deserves the supreme court they get |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
antigop (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 04:03 PM Response to Reply #26 |
37. Supreme Court nominees have to be confirmed by the Senate. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kucinich4America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 04:13 PM Response to Reply #37 |
46. And look at the ones the DLC'ers in the Senate have confirmed for Chimpy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
antigop (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 04:20 PM Response to Reply #46 |
49. So what type of a judge do you think a DLC'er would nominate? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 04:36 PM Response to Reply #49 |
56. Like one who would preserve civil rights, roe v wade, privacy. Did you see the debates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
antigop (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 05:15 PM Response to Reply #56 |
66. oh, and a DLC'er won't nominate a pro-corporate judge? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 06:07 PM Response to Reply #66 |
68. hmmm, like Bill Clinton nominated Ginsberg and Souter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
antigop (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 07:07 PM Response to Reply #68 |
72. and I'd strongly recommend you look at Supreme court pro-business decisions. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 08:55 PM Response to Reply #72 |
77. Without getting into specifics, do you really believe that there is no difference |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
antigop (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 11:38 PM Response to Reply #77 |
81. The Supreme Court is already -- NOW-- open for "business" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 04:33 PM Response to Reply #46 |
55. EveryONE of the DEMOCRATIC candidates have said they would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 04:30 PM Original message |
The reality is you can't count on the Senate to do the right thing /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
antigop (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 05:14 PM Response to Original message |
65. if we can't count on the Senate Dems, how can we count on a Dem pres? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 06:13 PM Response to Reply #65 |
69. because EVERYONE of the Democrats said they would choose judges who would preserve |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
antigop (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 07:08 PM Response to Reply #69 |
73. but they didn't say anything about pro-corporatism. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 08:45 PM Response to Reply #73 |
76. There is more than one issue. The Iraq War, human rights |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
antigop (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 11:39 PM Response to Reply #76 |
82. and a pro-corporate Democrat can appoint pro-corporate judges. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
antigop (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 04:06 PM Response to Reply #26 |
38. a pro-corporate Dem can nominate a pro-corporate judge n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 04:37 PM Response to Reply #38 |
59. ok, and they can also nominate someone like Justice Ginsburg or Souter /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rageneau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 03:12 PM Response to Original message |
28. Hell no! There are 568 of us here in Fla. who insist on voting for Nader |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spirit of 34 (119 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 05:22 PM Response to Reply #28 |
67. Hmmm, I wonder where we'd be today if people had the same attitude towards John C. Fremont |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bowens43 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
29. I will , even if I have to hold my nose when I vote...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Windy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 03:49 PM Response to Original message |
32. I don't recall this being a question in 2004. I believe we have a divisive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dbackjon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 04:00 PM Response to Reply #32 |
35. But look what happened in 2000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
terrya (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 04:10 PM Response to Reply #35 |
41. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughBeaumont (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 04:10 PM Response to Reply #35 |
42. No, not really. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 04:44 PM Response to Reply #32 |
60. Then work to get your candidate nominated, but if it doesn't happen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 04:07 PM Response to Original message |
39. Why do you need to be assured? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
surfermaw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 04:12 PM Response to Original message |
44. Yes, if we don't we will have another republican for 8 years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 04:12 PM Response to Original message |
45. Any Democrat beats the hell out of any Republican. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCKit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 04:15 PM Response to Original message |
47. In my opinion, we spend entirely too much time on the presidential candidates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigDDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 04:17 PM Response to Original message |
48. Looks like the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ilovesunshine (289 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 04:30 PM Response to Original message |
53. I'm not going to throw my vote away! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spirit of 34 (119 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 04:30 PM Response to Original message |
54. Nope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigDDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 04:37 PM Response to Reply #54 |
58. The RNC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spirit of 34 (119 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 04:59 PM Response to Reply #58 |
63. And the forces of the imperial status quo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dhalgren (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 09:53 PM Response to Reply #63 |
78. Excellent response! Hear! Hear! Well said! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 10:46 AM Response to Reply #78 |
101. Deleted message |
denem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 09:08 AM Response to Reply #63 |
91. Hillary belongs in Prison? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spirit of 34 (119 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 10:25 AM Response to Reply #91 |
98. No show trial necessary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 09:10 AM Response to Reply #63 |
92. You have guts I must say. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spirit of 34 (119 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 10:34 AM Response to Reply #92 |
100. Thanks...I think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 04:14 PM Response to Reply #100 |
114. You think correctly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigDDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 09:48 AM Response to Reply #63 |
95. Great!! Please check with the "forces of the imperial status quo" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spirit of 34 (119 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 10:31 AM Response to Reply #95 |
99. No problem, I'll give Hillary and Carlos Slim a ring tomorrow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigDDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 11:54 AM Response to Reply #99 |
108. Thanks Spirit, you're a star! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spirit of 34 (119 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 12:06 PM Response to Reply #108 |
109. Occassionally my union is in contract negotiations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackORoses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 03:42 PM Response to Reply #58 |
113. you just can't stand it that your candidate is so repulsive to so many, can you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissDeeds (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 05:09 PM Response to Original message |
64. That depends |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 06:14 PM Response to Original message |
70. If it turns out to be Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ToeBot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 06:39 PM Response to Original message |
71. No. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 07:10 PM Response to Original message |
74. By NOT voting for Ralph Nader when he announces again he'll be running |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rufus dog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 11:45 PM Response to Original message |
83. I will vote for Hillary if |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CitizenLeft (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 01:49 AM Response to Original message |
86. ABSOLUTELY. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frogmarch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 01:53 AM Response to Original message |
87. The Dem nominee will get my vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robcon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 08:52 AM Response to Original message |
88. I will not vote for Kucinich. All others have my vote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dhalgren (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 11:16 AM Response to Reply #88 |
105. Coming from a "Redskins" fan that's really something.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 09:21 AM Response to Original message |
93. Yes. It's true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DFW (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 09:28 AM Response to Original message |
94. I will vote for our candidate, regardless because......... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TriMetFan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 10:59 AM Response to Reply #94 |
102. Well said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aintitfunny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 09:50 AM Response to Original message |
96. Yes, absolutely. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 11:02 AM Response to Original message |
103. Of course!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluetrain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 11:16 AM Response to Original message |
106. The Democratic Party is not a hometown football team. Party leaders need to earn our loyalty. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DFW (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 01:52 PM Response to Reply #106 |
110. The party leader, Howard Dean, earned my loyalty long ago. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RichGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 11:25 AM Response to Original message |
107. If Carrot Top... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dulcinea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 03:25 PM Response to Original message |
111. Absolutely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lil Missy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 03:38 PM Response to Original message |
112. Yep. I'd vote for my dogs asshole over a repuke. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-29-07 06:15 PM Response to Original message |
115. I am putting everyone who swears loyalty on ignore, because ignoring us is what happens when we... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 03rd 2024, 11:31 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC