WSJ, pg1: Clinton Hits Rough Patch As Iowa Showdown Nears

[DeepModem Mom]

Clinton Hits Rough Patch As Iowa Showdown Nears
Rivals Strike From Left As She Courts Center; 'Responsibility Gene'
By JACKIE CALMES
November 23, 2007; Page A1


BALLSTON, Va. -- As Hillary Clinton huddled with advisers not long ago, she was pressed to stake a position popular with the party's left-leaning voters on one issue. But the presidential front-runner resisted. It wasn't her position. "If I do what you all want me to do, I'll look great for the next couple months," she said, according to one insider's account. "But what if I'm the nominee? I'll be ripped apart by the Republicans. And what if I'm the president? My hands will be tied."

The New York senator's response captured the tension at the core of her 10-month-old presidential bid, and helps illuminate why she has hit a dangerously bumpy stretch as January's first nominating votes near. Sen. Clinton actually is running two campaigns at once -- courting left-leaning Democrats to get the nomination, but mindful even now of maintaining a sufficiently centrist course to withstand Republican attacks and win election next November.

Beyond that, Sen. Clinton views her campaign as a template for her possible presidency. Having witnessed Bill Clinton's early struggles reconciling campaign promises with governing -- and guided by his private advice now -- she knows first hand that what candidates say now for political points can haunt them as president. Close advisers call this caution her "responsibility gene."

The result: As the front-runner, Sen. Clinton has drawn attacks from Democratic rivals at a crucial moment on topics ranging from Iran to taxes, even while holding positions that could serve her well in a general-election campaign, or as president. She will be tested further with four more Democratic debates in December, before the ultimate test -- in the opening nominating contest Jan. 3 in Iowa. In two recent polls of likely Iowa caucus-goers, Sen. Clinton was slightly ahead in one, but her chief rival, Illinois Sen. Barack Obama, had retaken the edge in the other. A decisive Clinton victory in Iowa potentially could clinch the nomination; a loss, or even a close call, makes her vulnerable in the states that follow.

No first-time candidate before has juggled these conflicting considerations in quite this way, because none has ever run from Sen. Clinton's unique position. She is far ahead in national polls for the nomination, her party is favored in polls to win the 2008 presidential election, and she has personal experience moving from campaign trail to White House. Typically, presidential candidates go a step at a time, focusing like lasers on the nomination, pivoting to the center only when it's in hand, and worrying about promises made once inside the West Wing....

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119577999706601663.html

[journalist3072]

1. Yawn....she has a double-digit national lead...and yet she's hit a "rough patch?" Okay....

[Captain Hilts]

2. And the WSJ couldn't be happier. Their hatred of the Clintons is amazing. nt

[DeepModem Mom]

3. I actually thought the article was pretty favorable to Clinton...

portraying her as responsibly taking a long view as she considers she might well be the next President of the U.S.

[juajen]

4. Though some will latch onto this as unfavorable,

I agree with you. We need a thinking President, one who is intellectually curious, but stable. Thinking ahead is the hallmark of a successful leader. I know everyone wants the progressive Hillary; but, she will have to govern from the middle to rule the country fairly. I am a Dennis Kucinich fan, but I long ago realized his time was not now. The other side does get to vote and we have to appreciate that. The "Golden Mean" was a brilliant philosophy of Aristotle's. Hillary knows it well. She is still my candidate.

[DeepModem Mom]

5. What a refreshing post in this forum, juajen! Thank you. nt