Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Court clears way for Michigan to hold January 15 primary

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-21-07 01:27 PM
Original message
Court clears way for Michigan to hold January 15 primary
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/11/21/court-clears-way-for-michigan-to-hold-january-15-primary/

November 21, 2007
Court clears way for Michigan to hold January 15 primary

Michigan Sen. Carl Levin has suggested that Michigan Democrats hold their caucus the same day as New Hampshire's primary.

LANSING, Michigan (AP) — Michigan's Jan. 15 presidential primary can go forward, the state Supreme Court decided Wednesday, keeping alive the state's bid to be one of the 2008 campaign's first contests.

The court decision should make it easier for New Hampshire Secretary of State Bill Gardner to schedule that state's primary,which New Hampshire law requires to be the nation's first. Gardner has been waiting to see what the Michigan courts would do.

The high court's decision should clear the way for the Republican and Democratic parties to take part in the Jan. 15 primary. Both have already filed letters with the secretary of state saying that's their plan.

But Democrats also have kept open the possibility of picking their presidential favorite through a party caucus, even if the primary is held.

That could delay Gardner's decision on the New Hampshire date even more. Michigan Sen. Carl Levin has suggested holding the Michigan caucus the same day as the New Hampshire primary, so Gardner doesn't want to make a decision until that issue is settled.

In its 4-1 decision Wednesday, the Michigan Supreme Court overturned lower court rulings that said the law setting up the primary was unconstitutional because it would let the state political parties keep track of voters' names and whether they took Democratic or GOP primary ballots but withhold that information from the public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SharonRB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-21-07 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. This sucks!
As of yesterday, we really thought it couldn't happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonRB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-21-07 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Correction -- it was a 4-3 decision
not 4-1. There are 7 justices on the court -- four of them Repubs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC