Imagine there are just three possible Dem tickets. You would pick...

[Colobo]

You pick:

[rucky]

1. One Ticket, One America?

you're fired.

[Colobo]

2. I changed it.

[rucky]

13. That'll work.

you're re-hired.

[Colobo]

14. Thanks. I appreciate it.

:bounce:

[begin_within]

3. Can I get a refund?

I thought I had bought either Kucinich/Edwards or Edwards/Kucinich.

[Colobo]

4. Let's give Dodd a chance.

[Double T]

5. If Kucinich isn't on the ticket, it isn't a ticket.

[peace frog]

6. No one "HAS" to do anything

I'll pass, thanks.

[rucky]

8. Thanks for playing!

we have some wonderful parting gifts for you in the green room.

[peace frog]

9. Nah

Green isn't my color, but thanks for your support.

[hlthe2b]

7. I really want to say something smartass...

but, nah... I got nuttin.

Pre-Primary Fatigue......

So, I'll just go vote....:evilgrin:

[MrModerate]

10. I realize the whole point is to constrain choice to . . .

low-likelihood pairings, but you should phrase your premise better, as in: "Imagine that there are only three possible Dem tickets -- which would you choose?"

Because I'm in a biddable mood, I went with Obama/Biden, because I've really liked Biden over the last several weeks, but don't think he can win the nomination, while Obama comes from my shortlist of three to head the ticket.

[napi21]

11. I would chose Biden/Obama.

Giving Obama the second on the ticket would eliminate the argument of lack of experience when he would be the candidate in 2016, and Biden has the straight talk that the people really want to hear right now. He's as honest as any politician ever is and has the foreign policy experience we need now. In his recent ad he said he can't wait to debate Rudy, and I know he'd throw the knock out punches too!

[patrice]

12. Possible?

Edwards:Obama

or

Obama:Edwards

I don't know what the definition of possible is, but either one of these tickets would light a lot of fires. I really DO wish it were possible.