Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Former Aide Blames Bush for Leak Deceit--Valerie Plame

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-20-07 04:27 PM
Original message
Former Aide Blames Bush for Leak Deceit--Valerie Plame
Edited on Tue Nov-20-07 04:28 PM by 1corona4u
By MATT APUZZO – 6 minutes ago

WASHINGTON (AP) — Former White House press secretary Scott McClellan blames President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney for efforts to mislead the public about the role of White House aides in leaking the identity of a CIA operative.

In an excerpt from his forthcoming book, McClellan recounts the 2003 news conference in which he told reporters that aides Karl Rove and I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby were "not involved" in the leak involving operative Valerie Plame.

"There was one problem. It was not true," McClellan writes, according to a brief excerpt released Tuesday. "I had unknowingly passed along false information. And five of the highest-ranking officials in the administration were involved in my doing so: Rove, Libby, the vice president, the president's chief of staff and the president himself."

Bush's chief of staff at the time was Andrew Card.

The excerpt, posted on the Web site of publisher PublicAffairs, renews questions about what went on in the West Wing and how much Bush and Cheney knew about the leak. For years, it was McClellan's job to field — and often duck — those types of questions.

Now that he's spurring them, answers are equally hard to come by.

White House press secretary Dana Perino said it wasn't clear what McClellan meant in the excerpt and she had no immediate comment. McClellan turned down interview requests Tuesday.

Plame maintains the White House quietly outed her to reporters. Plame and her husband, former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, said the leak was retribution for his public criticism of the Iraq war. The accusation dogged the administration and made Plame a cause celebre among many Democrats.

McClellan's book, "What Happened," isn't due out until April, and the excerpt released Monday was merely a teaser. It doesn't get into detail about how Bush and Cheney were involved or reveal what happened behind the scenes.

In the fall of 2003, after authorities began investigating the leak, McClellan told reporters that he'd personally spoken to Rove, who was Bush's top political adviser, and Libby, who was Cheney's chief of staff.

"They're good individuals, they're important members of our White House team, and that's why I spoke with them, so that I could come back to you and say that they were not involved," McClellan said at the time.

Both men, however, were involved. Rove was one of the original sources for the newspaper column that identified Plame. Libby also spoke to reporters about the CIA officer and was convicted of lying about those discussions. He is the only person to be charged in the case.

Since that news conference, however, the official White House stance has shifted and it has been difficult to get a clear picture of what happened behind closed doors around the time of the leak.

McClellan's flat denials gave way to a steady drumbeat of "no comment." And Bush's original pledge to fire anyone involved in the leak became a promise to fire anyone who "committed a crime."

In a CNN interview earlier this year, McClellan made no suggestion that Bush knew either Libby or Rove was involved in the leak. McClellan said his statements to reporters were what he and the president "believed to be true at the time based on assurances that we were both given."

Bush most recently addressed the issue in July after commuting Libby's 30-month prison term. He acknowledged that some in the White House were involved in the leak. Then, after repeatedly declining to discuss the ongoing investigation, he said the case was closed and it was time to move on.

___

Associated Press writer Jennifer Loven contributed to this report.
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jH9M6k9jnKVo5cmYQEtzHe7vpxTwD8T1KVNO0

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RichGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-20-07 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. WOW!
Will this finally wake up that last 20%?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-20-07 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. Kicked and recommended for "restoring honor and integrity to the White House"
Thanks for the thread 1corona4u.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-20-07 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yeah....I have a feeling this will ...
Edited on Tue Nov-20-07 04:38 PM by 1corona4u
become a real factor in the election. As in, republicans not being able to score...they will get creamed.

(edited to clarify)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-20-07 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. You believe
this will help them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-20-07 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. NO...
I think this will kill ANY chance they had at the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-20-07 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I agree,
my post was just using Bush's own words against him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-20-07 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-20-07 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
7. OK, OK, now even their own press secretary accuses them of treason...
So is impeachment now "back on the table?" And if not, WHY, for Chrissakes???!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-20-07 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. LOL...
I know, right, HELLOOOOOO.....but, Cheney and him have changed laws to protect themselves....really. I've posted this before, but please people, watch it. It will amaze you. (what they are guilty of)
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/cheney/view/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hieronymus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-20-07 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
9. This is such great news ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-20-07 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. You know...
Bush will just avoid any questions/answers for it though...as usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-20-07 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
12. Chris Matthews is on it now...
catch it later if you can..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-20-07 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. bump...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-20-07 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
14. Please let this be it...
as I have said countless times before.
NOW is it TREASON?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andyrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-20-07 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. It's been treason since the moment it happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC