Edwards Criticizes Clinton Over Iraq (saying her position is tantamount to "continuing the war")

[jefferson_dem]

Edwards Criticizes Clinton Over Iraq
By MARTIN GRIFFITH – 1 hour ago

RENO, Nev. (AP) — Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards criticized Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton over her unwillingness to set a timetable for withdrawing U.S. troops from Iraq, saying her position is tantamount to "continuing the war."

Speaking to reporters after a town hall meeting Sunday in Reno, Edwards contrasted his Iraq views with Clinton's and said the Democratic front-runner owes it to voters to provide specific plans on how to end the war.

Edwards said his plan calls for the immediate withdrawal of as many as 50,000 troops and the full withdrawal of all troops within 10 months. He also said he would prohibit permanent U.S. military bases in Iraq.

At a town hall meeting Friday in nearby Fernley, Clinton said she would withdraw troops "as soon as I can" if President Bush fails to do so. Campaign aides called her a war opponent but said she has offered no timetable for a troop withdrawal.

"She says that she will end the war, but she also says she will continue combat missions in Iraq and keep combat troops stationed in Iraq," Edwards said. "From my perspective, that's not ending the war. That's continuing the war. In fact, it's continuing the occupation. So we have really different views about that."

In a news release issued before the town hall meeting, Edwards said, "On such an important question we need honesty and answers, not double-talk and evasions."

Clinton spokeswoman Hilarie Grey defended the New York senator, saying Edwards' remarks reflect a struggling candidate.

"This is a bogus attack from a candidate who is angry that his own campaign hasn't taken off," Grey said. "The fact is that Sen. Edwards and Sen. Clinton have both said they'd use U.S. forces to go after al-Qaida in Iraq. So it's unfortunate that Sen. Edwards keeps making this phony charge when he's out campaigning."

<SNIP>

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jsSZnttcy_ZKNJfDowQ_ti4lHJBQD8T0FTK80

[99th_Monkey]

1. Hillary got "back-doored" by Bush on Iraq/Iran

Sep 24, 2007 6:33 PM (55 days ago) by Bill Sammon, The Examiner
Washington, D.C. (Map, News) - President Bush is quietly providing back-channel advice to Hillary Rodham Clinton, urging her to modulate her rhetoric so she can effectively prosecute the war in Iraq if elected president.

In an interview for the new book “The Evangelical President,” White House Chief of Staff Josh Bolten said Bush has “been urging candidates: ‘Don’t get yourself too locked in where you stand right now. If you end up sitting where I sit, things could change dramatically.’ ”

http://www.examiner.com/a-953145~Bush_quietly_advising_Hillary_Clinton__top_Democrats.html

[neutron]

2. Edwards criticizes Clinton on everything he can think of

Edwards wants the power so bad.

[seriousstan]

4. WOW, you mean he takes running for President of The United States seriously?

Just like every other candidate....the power hungry bastage.

[creeksneakers2]

3. That skips the really good part

Edwards' bogus vows to take away health care from members of Congress gets even deeper.

Edwards, who's locked in a tight race in Iowa with Clinton and Sen. Barack Obama, also criticized Clinton over her response to an Edwards' television ad concerning health care.

In the ad, the former North Carolina senator promises to use his power as president to take away health care benefits from members of Congress unless they pass universal health care by July 2009.

The Clinton campaign branded the threat as "unconstitutional gimmickry" and said the president doesn't have the power to take health care away from Congress unilaterally.

Actually, Edwards can't take away health care from members of Congress. The 27th Amendment prohibits varying the compensation of members of Congress until after an intervening election. Even if it wasn't for the 27th Amendment, Edwards would need to get Congress to vote out their own health care. There's no way in hell they'd do that.

Clinton called Edwards on the farce and Edwards was asked about it by the press. Edwards tried to wiggle out by saying he'd use the power of the bully pulpit. That's nothing like the sensational threat Edwards made in his ad. Edwards isn't actually going to take anything away from Congress, but he'll complain about Congress. That'll get 'em.

Now Edwards has a hysterical new approach to wiggling his way out of the fraud. Edwards said,

"To me, this is exactly the kind of response you'd expect from a Washington insider," Edwards said. "(It's) circling the wagons, looking out for politicians inside of Washington instead of shaking up the place and doing what's necessary to get universal health care passed. This is another example of the clear choices our country has in this election."

So now Edward says corrupt Hillary is keeping him from doing what he can't possibly do and admitted he couldn't possibly do. How does anybody believe a word Edwards says?

[McCamy Taylor]

5. Note the MSM will cover Edwards when he bashes Hillary, not when he discusses issues. The MSM

wants us to form a circular firing squad and implode over the war like we did in 1968. They are encouraging it. We hear people like Chris Matthews endlessly analyze what it means when Edwards speaks to a group of Isrealis and says all options are on the table re: Iran or what Hillary means when she won't give a time table or what Obama means, as if the corporate media is trying to make people think to themselves "Are some of these Democratic candidates not really sincere about ending the war? Maybe I shouldn't base my vote next year on the war. Maybe I should base it on some other issue. Like immigration. Or Terra."