Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Frank Rich column today on Giuliani - it's a pip

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-18-07 07:16 PM
Original message
Frank Rich column today on Giuliani - it's a pip

What ‘That Regan Woman’ Knows

By FRANK RICH
Published: November 18, 2007

NEW Yorkers who remember Rudy Giuliani as the bullying New York mayor, not as the terminally cheerful “America’s Mayor” cooing to babies in New Hampshire, have always banked on one certainty: his presidential candidacy was so preposterous it would implode before he got anywhere near the White House.

Surely, we reassured ourselves, the all-powerful Republican values enforcers were so highly principled that they would excommunicate him because of his liberal social views, three wives and estranged children. Or a firewall would be erected by the firefighters who are enraged by his self-aggrandizing rewrite of 9/11 history. Or Judith Giuliani, with her long-hidden first marriage and Louis Vuitton ’tude, would send red-state voters screaming into the night.

Wrong, wrong and wrong. But how quickly and stupidly we forgot about the other Judith in the Rudy orbit. That would be Judith Regan, who disappeared last December after she was unceremoniously fired from Rupert Murdoch’s publishing house, HarperCollins. Last week Ms. Regan came roaring back into the fray, a silver bullet aimed squarely at the heart of the Giuliani campaign.

Ms. Regan filed a $100 million lawsuit against her former employer, claiming she was unjustly made a scapegoat for the O. J. Simpson “If I Did It” fiasco that (briefly) embarrassed Mr. Murdoch and his News Corporation. But for those of us not caught up in the Simpson circus, what’s most riveting about the suit are two at best tangential sentences in its 70 pages: “In fact, a senior executive in the News Corporation organization told Regan that he believed she had information about Kerik that, if disclosed, would harm Giuliani’s presidential campaign. This executive advised Regan to lie to, and to withhold information from, investigators concerning Kerik.”


http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/18/opinion/18rich.html?ex=1353042000&en=a02e17f1b9535096&ei=5124&partner=permalink&exprod=permalink
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-18-07 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. good read
Giving ya a K&R. Posted it this am in E&O and it sank. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-18-07 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Nice to see you in GDP!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-18-07 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I'm a lurker
:hide: Read lots, say little. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-18-07 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R - thanks! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antiimperialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-18-07 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. Regan, don't release those tapes yet
Wait till October 31st, 2008 :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-18-07 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. anybody read the Chicago Tribune artlcle from the Rich piece? he TOOK his own
Edited on Sun Nov-18-07 08:18 PM by Gabi Hayes
mayoral records when he left office, laundered them, most likely, through a tax exempt foundation (with the same address as Giuliani partners....are you shocked?), then returned them!

I hadn't heard/seen/read a word about this til now.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-giuliani_bdoct28,1,6179203.story?ctrack=1&cset=true

of course, they insist that nothing untoward happened, and that ALL records they got were returned, despite the possible 'embarrassing' nature of them. how's anybody ever going to know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC