Rhymes With Front-Runner
By Eugene Robinson
Friday, November 16, 2007; Page A33
Hillary Rodham Clinton in Des Moines on Saturday. (Yana Paskova/Getty Images)
"That's an excellent question" normally doesn't make the list of utterances that can get a candidate in trouble on the campaign trail. But this presidential campaign isn't what anyone would call normal. John McCain gave that anodyne response Monday at a "town hall" event in South Carolina when an elegant woman, of patrician bearing, posed this question about a possible Democratic nominee: "How do we beat the (expletive)?"...
***
It was just an odd little moment, among many, in an odd campaign. In the end, I think it tells us less about McCain than it does about Clinton's unprecedented candidacy -- her unique strengths and her unique vulnerabilities. As the first woman with a legitimate shot at being elected president, Clinton has brilliantly navigated the minefield of gender. A year ago, the conventional wisdom was that voters, especially men, might perceive a woman as soft or weak and thus worry about how she would perform as commander in chief. Today, her Democratic opponents attack her as too hawkish, and few doubt her ability to command.
Yet she has also found a way to speak to women, or at least to Democratic women, in a "just us girls" tone that manages not to come off as cloying. Her Democratic rivals face a problem that a Republican opponent would face in the general election if she were to get the nomination: how to attack her without seeming either sexist or ungallant. They still haven't quite figured it out; the recent damage to her campaign was self-inflicted.
But there's another side to the rhymes-with-rich episode. What would possess that nice-looking Republican lady in South Carolina to phrase her question in such a vulgar way?...I think some of the Hillary-hatred arises simply because she's a woman -- and because that vulgar word, the one that rhymes with rich, is always available to describe a woman who gets a little too powerful, or acts like too much of a smarty-pants, or exudes a bit too much authority. That word isn't just a put-down, it's also a pointed question: Just who the hell does she think she is?
The answer, at the moment, is that she's leading the Democratic field. Her candidacy, like Barack Obama's in a different context, is forcing the nation to confront old assumptions and prejudices -- forcing us to decide just who the hell we think we are....
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/15/AR2007111502030.html?nav=hcmodule