|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
ariesgem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-12-07 10:32 PM Original message |
USA TODAY/Gallup Poll: Obama, Clinton Virtually Tied - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe the Revelator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-12-07 10:33 PM Response to Original message |
1. Holy shit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-12-07 10:35 PM Response to Original message |
2. Old, old, old poll. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe the Revelator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-12-07 10:37 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Ah, I see. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ariesgem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-12-07 10:50 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. The article was dated 11/12/2007 . That was my reason for posting it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-12-07 10:52 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. The news 11 site seems to have messed up. It's the June 3, 07 poll |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-12-07 10:37 PM Response to Original message |
4. Linda Ellerbe once said of USA TODAY, "It's a newspaper for people who find |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-12-07 10:43 PM Response to Original message |
5. Tis is the 6/1-3/07 poll with the wrong date on the article. (link here) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ariesgem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-12-07 10:56 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. I didn't mean to post it as "a hoax". I read the article which was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-12-07 10:58 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. Sorry for the accusation. I should have just said error |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-12-07 10:46 PM Response to Original message |
6. The only Gallup Poll on the USA Today site says Clintons's big lead is "unchanged" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bitwit1234 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-12-07 10:52 PM Response to Original message |
9. I'm not worried about Obama being tied with Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-12-07 11:22 PM Response to Reply #9 |
26. I'm not worried about Obama being tied with Hillary either, he has plenty of time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NOVA_Dem (195 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-12-07 10:55 PM Response to Original message |
10. Edit: Channel 11 Needs a new webmaster |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-12-07 10:57 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NOVA_Dem (195 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-12-07 11:07 PM Response to Reply #12 |
20. 50% of the reason HC isn't like on this board is b/c of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-12-07 11:12 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. Coming from someone who posts falsehoods in ALL CAPS, then edits the post to cover their tracks... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NOVA_Dem (195 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-13-07 12:57 AM Response to Reply #22 |
28. You gotta a lot of nerve. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-12-07 10:57 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. I think it's still a hoax. No where in their article do they give a link to that poll |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-12-07 11:02 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. Correct story here (USA Today site from June 2007) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-12-07 11:07 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. Thanks. The race is gettng more interesting by the minute. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Connie_Corleone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-12-07 11:12 PM Response to Reply #17 |
23. Last updated 160 days ago. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ariesgem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-12-07 11:15 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Sorry. I was browsing through articles and this one was dated 11/7 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-12-07 11:00 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. Obvious clues |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ariesgem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-12-07 11:12 PM Response to Reply #10 |
21. My apologies for posting this. I stand corrected. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-12-07 11:15 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. Cool. Sorry for jumping ugly at you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-12-07 10:58 PM Response to Original message |
15. Obama is timing his moves so incredibly briliiant, Hillary's numbers can only go down starting this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-12-07 11:03 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. Incredible timing... he's gone five months back in time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-12-07 11:27 PM Response to Reply #18 |
27. five months back in time? - in a race like this one never shoots their full load in the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 10:17 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC