|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
IndianaJones (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:07 PM Original message |
What generation is Obama? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:09 PM Response to Original message |
1. Yes, boomers were born from 1945-1964... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintonista2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:09 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. OOPS! LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bullet1987 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:11 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. D'OH! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ronnykmarshall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 09:01 PM Response to Reply #1 |
41. Me too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bullet1987 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:10 PM Response to Original message |
3. No...baby boomers are those |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintonista2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:13 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DURHAM D (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:13 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. You are kidding aren't you? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HockeyMom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:14 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. 1946 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:14 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. 1946 to 1964 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NMMNG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:15 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:15 PM Response to Original message |
10. The last year for Baby Boomers was 1957....I should know... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:18 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. My sister and I have always considered |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:24 PM Response to Reply #14 |
23. I always figured I was lucky just to sneak in... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
juno jones (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:45 PM Response to Reply #14 |
34. 1963 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaJones (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:18 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. from the census bureau... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NMMNG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:18 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. Baby Boomer Headquarters lists the same years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:19 PM Response to Reply #10 |
17. The end date is usally in the 1960-1964 range |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:22 PM Response to Reply #10 |
20. Most books on boomers use 1945 or 46-1964. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CyberPieHole (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:32 PM Response to Reply #10 |
28. Yes, the WHOLE world is WRONG...Yet, YOU are right... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe the Revelator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:17 PM Response to Original message |
11. When people think of baby boomer they think of people who were young in the 1960's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goodgd_yall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:21 PM Response to Reply #11 |
18. Yes, often the case. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:17 PM Response to Original message |
12. Generation Vexed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:23 PM Response to Reply #12 |
22. Lol, so it would seem. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goodgd_yall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:17 PM Response to Original message |
13. Is this supposed to refer to the 60s activists statement Obama made? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:21 PM Response to Original message |
19. US Census Bureau says 1946-1964 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DURHAM D (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:23 PM Response to Original message |
21. Just so you know - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:28 PM Response to Reply #21 |
25. That is really pitiful... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NC_Nurse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:27 PM Response to Original message |
24. I'm born in 1961 like Obama... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaJones (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:29 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. Census bureau. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NC_Nurse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:35 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. Oh, I thought you really wanted an answer... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CyberPieHole (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:28 PM Response to Original message |
26. Obama is a Baby-Boomer...who can't add... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NMMNG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:35 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. He seems to be trying to sell himself as a GenXer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaJones (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:36 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. I'd like to get out of that generation. Image of being a slacker. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NMMNG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:47 PM Response to Reply #31 |
35. It's a bad stereotype |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:38 PM Response to Original message |
32. Let me put it this way... I'm almost exactly Obama's age and I grew up expecting to die in Vietnam |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frazzled (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 08:02 PM Response to Reply #32 |
36. Precocious, I guess |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 08:18 PM Response to Reply #36 |
40. I had never known a world without Vietnam and the draft, so what else could I expect? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 08:04 PM Response to Reply #32 |
37. The Selective service was still |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msongs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 07:39 PM Response to Original message |
33. the Pepsi generation, number two behind.....that other cola nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryAmish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 08:05 PM Response to Original message |
38. If he identifies as an American, he is a Baby Boomer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
illinoisprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-08-07 08:09 PM Response to Original message |
39. he is at the very end tip of boomers. However, as one I have long thought the same |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 06th 2024, 10:41 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC