Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What does the verb "swiftboat" mean to you?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 11:05 PM
Original message
What does the verb "swiftboat" mean to you?
Edited on Wed Nov-07-07 11:14 PM by cryingshame
would anyone be willing to come up with a definition?

Edit- from Wikipedia (gives more examples of the term being used than the ones posted below)

Swiftboating is American political jargon that is used (primarily) as a strong pejorative description of some kind of attack that the speaker considers unfair—for example, an ad hominem attack or a smear campaign.

The term comes from the Swift Vets and POWs for Truth (formerly "Swift Boat Veterans for Truth") and their widely-publicized <1> attacks on 2004 Presidential candidate John Kerry. <2> (For a similar example of a pejorative verb based on a historical incident, see "borking," coined as a result of the fight over the nomination of Robert Bork to the United States Supreme Court.)

Historically, terms like "swiftboating", "Swift Boating", "Swift Boat tactics", etc. were given currency by people who had very negative views of SBVT. Others have strongly objected (see below) to the criticism of SBVT implied by such negative usage.

In a 2005 column "The Swift Boating of Cindy Sheehan," Frank Rich offered such synonyms for the term as "character assassination" and "smear." Rich's use of the term implied a special connection to attacks on someone's military record: "Character assassination is the Karl Rove tactic of choice, eagerly mimicked by his media surrogates, whenever the White House is confronted by a critic who challenges it on matters of war. The Swift Boating is especially vicious if the critic has more battle scars than a president who connived to serve stateside and a vice president who had "other priorities" during Vietnam." <3>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think Kerry and Cleland were swiftboated, You don't
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Well, I was campaigning for Kerry and witnessed a paid for group invent a Lie about Kerry.
And the Media ran with it even though it was proven time and again it was a lie.

Now Cleland had an ad run against him with a pix of Osama. IMO, that isn't the same as what happened to Kerry.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 11:09 PM
Original message
So you don't think Cleland was swiftboated?
Even though the ad you refer to was created by a group called "Swift Boat Veterans for Truth"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
11. Just because the same Liars did the ad on Cleland wouldn't necessarily imply same tactic.
Putting Osama's face on the ad and implying Cleland was the exact opposite of a war hero by using an image is different, in my opinion, than creating an entire false narrative with people making claims that were untrue.

In Cleland's case, it was by suggestion only.

In Kerry's case, it involved people making spoken/written accusations.

Apparently, the word refers to ANY (or all) smear campaigns?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. I would say Cleland was NOT swiftboated, just smeared.
Edited on Wed Nov-07-07 11:33 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter
False PERSONAL testimony should be a requisite of something worth calling a swiftboat campaign. Like if they found someone to say he say Cleland shaking hands with Osama.

Cleland was smeared and slandered, but not swiftboated. If every scurrilous political slander is a "swiftbooat" job then the term losses its very useful, specific meaning.

Ann Coulter wrote a lot of stuff about the circumstances of Cleland's injury, and if that line of attack was fleshed out by a faux independent group it would have qualified.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. Wherever did you get the idea that swiftboating required accusations from individuals?
That's just crazy. I've never heard anything like that before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. "crazy" ?
There is only one unambiguous no-doubt instance of swift-boating... the original SBVT effort against Kerry.

What distinguished that campaign from the hundreds of previous independent-expenditure smear campaigns is that it involved people personally falsely testifying as to bad actions by the candidate.

That's why it got so much free news coverage, as opposed to a similar "independent" ad campaign that just said "Kerry flip-flops" or "Kerry supports queers" or whatever.

The swiftboat ads purported to be newsworthy in and of themselves, pretending to contain testimony rather than abstract accusations.

That's what made them unlike other negative campaign tactics, and made "swift-boating" a useful word.
If it just means "smear" or "lie" then it serves little purpose as a term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. Yes, crazy
What made the story have legs was the fact that it was a 527 org.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Well, the term originated with Kerry. And in his case, it wasn't innuendo.
Edited on Thu Nov-08-07 12:16 AM by cryingshame
It was an outright fiction.

just out of curiosity do you see a difference between:

A. a 30 second campaign ad using innuendo, where an image is flashed to insinuate some negative attribute
B. an entire narrative involving actual people making actual false claims?

In any case, it seems the term has simply come to mean 'smear'. IMO, this cheapens the atrocity of what happened to Kerry.

But then, after I started reading Wiki citations etc, I find that even Kerry himself uses the word in its broader meaning.

Apparently, I never got the memo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. You're just wrong, again
The Cleland swiftboating was more than just a commercial and no one has ever said that swiftboating requires personal testimony (until now, that is)

Never. Happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Character assassination ...
Based on lies spewed by liars.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Make7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. Swiftboat - v. To bring baseless charges against someone...
Edited on Wed Nov-07-07 11:10 PM by Make7
Swiftboat - v. To bring baseless charges against someone that are utterly belied by the evidence, especially if the evidence and facts present a picture that is the complete opposite of what is charged; To practice McCarthyism in the 21st Century.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_oet&address=358x190#s
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Sounds like what the OP is trying to do
the OP keeps implying that Clinton said somthing other than "Kerry and Cleland were swiftboated"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. Using an "independent" group to run slanderous & false ads against someone
Edited on Wed Nov-07-07 11:11 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. to make up totally false shit on someone. n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. Does it trouble you at all that Clinton used "swiftboat" as an adjective, not a verb?
Or are you just off in outrage land...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. No outraged. I am now very curious about how the word is used.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Fair enough. I'm surprised by these responses.
If the word doesn't mean the use of a bogus "independent" group to smear a candidate then it's not a useful word. Any broader meaning than that and the term has no use. But most of your respondents interpret it as something broader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. I think -I- am the one doesn't know what it means-that it has become broader in usage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Yes, overly broad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. You don't understand the meaning of swiftboated? Did you just fall
off the turnip truck?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. Lies.. funded by
dirty money.. willing to do anything to keep their dirty money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
10. To be bullied, pilloried and libeled in the media........
by those who opposed you. An organized series of swift attacks designed to make the victim look bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-07-07 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
18. It means to be attacked with lies, half truths and inaccuracies.
Swiftboating does not have to be falsely questioning a person's military credentials.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
24. To me it means what the Obama supporters are doing to Hlllary Clinton
but of course the republicans have done it to her for 20 years, she is used to it now.

The Obama supporters have holy fits when someone pans their Saint. You know the gay bashing thing, the Pledge of Allegiance thing...they were batshit crazy...but then they turn around and repeat rumors with no foundation against Hillary...but then you think to yourself that's the only type of supporter Obama can get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gorekerrydreamticket Donating Member (422 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
25. Organized smear campaign funded/orchestrated by anonymous backers....n/m
my 2 cents
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC