Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge: Sharpton filing incomplete for ballot

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 12:35 PM
Original message
Judge: Sharpton filing incomplete for ballot
By ADRIAN ANGELETTE
aangelette@theadvocate.com
Advocate staff writer

The Rev. Al Sharpton's name will not appear on the Democratic presidential preference primary ballot when Louisiana voters go to the polls March 9, a state judge ruled Thursday.

Sharpton's candidacy papers were incomplete, state District Judge Curtis Calloway ruled, because they failed to have a complete address, a phone number, and did not specify how Sharpton wanted his name on the ballot.

In addition, Calloway ruled that Sharpton did not follow state law when he submitted a bank check instead of a certified or cashier's check.

Sharpton's attorney, George Gates IV of Washington, D.C., also filed the wrong kind of legal challenge to get Calloway to halt the election, the judge ruled.

more: http://www.2theadvocate.com/stories/022004/new_sharpton001.shtml

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh boy....how could they be so careless?
Do you think there is more to the story?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Sure. There's a huge plot to discredit and derail Sharpton's bid
it's possible I suppose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rooktoven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. which would prove not all conspiracies are bad --nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC