Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

David Brooks NYT casts Hillary as Col. "You can't handle the truth" Jesep

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 09:48 AM
Original message
David Brooks NYT casts Hillary as Col. "You can't handle the truth" Jesep
His OpEd parodying the debate is of course not friendly to the Dems. He takes shots at just about everyone. At the end he uses the "You can't handle the truth" speech of Col. Jesep in A Few Good Men but inserting Hillary as Jesep. The satirized point being that Hillary is likely the toughest we got to go against the repukes. It made me laugh so I thought I would share it.

I will just post that section, if you want to read the rest of his dem attacking its at the nyt opinion section.

WILLIAMS: Now we turn to our lightning round in which each of the candidates will have 3.75 seconds to spout pandering clichés that demonstrate how the campaigning process has reduced their minds to pabulum. Senator Clinton, which issue would you like to obfuscate next?

CLINTON: Obfuscate? Son, let me tell you the truth, because you can’t handle the truth. We live in a world with enemies. We fight elections where people play rough. Who’s going to do it? These two pretty boys? The left-wing nutjobs in our party who sit around watching Bill Maher?

I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom. And my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, leads to victory. Because deep down, in places you don’t talk about in Santa Monica dinner parties, you want me at that podium. You need me at that podium. And I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to the self-righteous liberals who rise and sleep under the blanket of the very victory I provide! I wish you’d just said thanks and went on your way. In any case, I don’t give a damn what answers you think you’re entitled to!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
faithfulcitizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. that is so very funny and clever...
:rofl: Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I thought so. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. Col Jessup was a loon
His meltdown was not supposed to be a great man defending an uncomfortable truth. In that scene he was exposed as an over-the-top nutjob who had lost all ability to distinguish between goals and methods.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Sure, but are you saying that
the character would not have come off better had he not broken the law? The reason the scene and his line is memorable is because there are times when people "can't handle the truth".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. The point was that he did disregard the law and values
Had the backstory to that scene been an incident where Jessup did the right thing despite it being technically against the rules, then he would have been a hero and the line "You can't handle the truth" would have had a different meaning.

But the plot was that he had participated in something clearly wrong, and which was only justified in his own mind by his blind fanaticism. So the "truth" wasn't really the truth. It was a madman's truth.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Granted
and Brooks chose this in part because it is not a flattering portrait, I still think its interesting that he viewed Hillary as the "rough and tough character".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-04-07 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Alas, none of the Democrats are tough in the right sense
Edited on Sun Nov-04-07 12:05 PM by Armstead
Unfortunately, none of the democratic nominees have that ability to convey tough strength with common sense and our better values in their political personas.

Frankly, that's where I miss the presence of the guy in your screen name. In terms of foreign and military policy, he's da man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC