|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
flpoljunkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 01:02 PM Original message |
CNN: Leahy will vote NO on Mukasey as Attorney General! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rusty_parts2001 (728 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 01:02 PM Response to Original message |
1. Good! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 01:03 PM Response to Original message |
2. But will they block the nomination in committee? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 01:03 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. His No vote will help in the Committee. We will soon see. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HERVEPA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 01:05 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. Depends on Schumer, who originally pushed for him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glarius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 01:29 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. All Schumer has to do is say he wasn't aware of Mukasey's thoughts on waterboarding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 01:11 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. The Judiciary Committee vote is set for Tuesday, November 6th. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 01:04 PM Response to Original message |
4. Excellent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 01:04 PM Response to Original message |
5. Yyeeeeesssss! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MuseRider (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 01:06 PM Response to Original message |
7. Thank goodness! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thereismore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 01:08 PM Response to Original message |
8. all dems must vote NO in order to block him in the committee. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 01:31 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. I was surprised to learn that if one Democrat votes with the R's, the vote will go to full Senate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thereismore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-02-07 01:46 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Right you are. Not a single reeper can be counted on voting no. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 07:51 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC