Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BILL RICHARDSON: A SERIOUS CANDIDATE (The Nation)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
seasat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 10:05 PM
Original message
BILL RICHARDSON: A SERIOUS CANDIDATE (The Nation)
This post one of several articles favorable to Richardson that have appeared in the Nation. It's interesting that one of the most liberal political magazines has had several articles in favor of Bill Richardson while The New Republic (the "liberal" magazine that backed the Iraq war) has been one of Richardson's biggest critics.

The Democrats and Republicans who are seeking the presidency run the gamut from ridiculous to frightening. But one word that does not apply to most of them is "serious." Oh, yes, of course, they are serious about winning their respective nominations, or at least about positioning themselves for a vice presidential run, a Cabinet post or the next television camera.

But serious about governing? That's a higher standard than most of the contenders are even trying to reach.
...
Kemp, McCaffrey and their compatriots will gather November 8 in Manchester, N.H., for an event sponsored by the New Hampshire Institute of Politics at Saint Anselm College and the Center for U.S. Global Engagement. The purpose will be to urge the presidential candidates of both parties to speak more aggressively and consistently about the use of non-military tools -- negotiation, direct aid, loans medical diplomacy and moral authority - to reengage the United States with the world.

All the candidates have been asked to respond to the call. So far, only one has agreed to participate: Bill Richardson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good to see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. The kind of candidate we need. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. And he has the best resume, but he needs to be a MUCH better candidate. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Sorry, but I think Biden should be #4 and not Richardson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Huh? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. Sorry but Richardson hasn't impressed me at all!
Yes he ahs a good resume in negotiating, so maybe he should be in the state department, but he simply doesn't make it in the Prez ring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesertFlower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
7. richardson is qualified,
but he lacks "charisma". he's dull.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Think82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. Joe Biden: Seriouser
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seasat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. And yet Richardson beats Hillary in his state; Biden loses to Hillary in his.
It seems there is a reason why Richardson is still above Biden in the polls. If you can't get the folks that know you best to back you, how do you expect to win a national election?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC