Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

You Only Enforce BUSHCO's Behavior-When The One Weapon He Fears (IMPEACHMENT) Is Taken Off The Table

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 01:10 PM
Original message
You Only Enforce BUSHCO's Behavior-When The One Weapon He Fears (IMPEACHMENT) Is Taken Off The Table
David Bromwich
The Power of Inspection and the Claim of Impeachment

...............

Against impeachment, there is this to be said, that the majority apparently lack
the votes to make it succeed. Yet Nancy Pelosi showed a remarkable absence of
political mind when, as the leader of a new majority in a critical time, facing
a president out of control, she declared that impeachment was not an option. You
don't reassure an opponent--especially an opponent who understands nothing but
the language of force--that the one weapon he rightly fears has been taken out
of your arsenal.
Besides, there are powers of inspection short of impeachment,
which the Democratic Congress has been inexplicably backward in using. Dick
Cheney has never held a press conference, and has seldom been asked to answer a
question. His chief of staff, David Addington, is unknown on Capitol Hill. Why
have they never been called to testify? Say by the Senate Foreign Relations
Committee (for misconduct in the control of post-invasion Iraq)? Or the Senate
Intelligence Committee (for the slanting of estimates on Iraq in 2002-03, on
Iran in 2006, on Syria in 2007)? Or by the Judiciary Committee (for overturning
in secret the constitutional ban on torture and the legal restrictions on
domestic surveillance)? When one thinks of the public education on the war in
Vietnam that was supplied by the Foreign Relations Committee under Senator
William Fulbright, nothing except timidity and a failure of self-respect can
explain the omission of such hearings today.


..All fanatics are dangerous; and not all of them know this about themselves; but the
fanatics of this administration and their propagandists, do indeed know it, and
they have begun to turn "dangerous" into a term of praise. They truly believe
the surest way to reform the Middle East is to revolutionize the entire region
through the engineered collapse of several governments at once, or in close
succession. A much larger war triggered by accident, and a mounting series of
escalations, would also bury their responsibility in the confusion, chaos, and
desolation that followed.

But to carry it off they need the American people to be their accomplices. And
that is where the salutary shadow of impeachment may matter.
Even if it remains
a discussion only, the threat could remind the public, and give notice to TV
presenters innocent of political knowledge, that there is an unpleasant smell,
a suspicion probably worth exploring, about the familiar crooked path to the
next war. There is something finally neither admirable nor laughable about the
men who have done these things to our country.

more at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-bromwich/the-power-of-inspection-a_b_70594.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Saying that impeachment was off the table was an incredibly STUPID thing for
Nancy Pelosi to say.

She compromised her position in Congress by doing so, giving Bush a green light to continue fucking over the American people.

Pelosi should be ashamed of herself, and anyone that STUPID should not be in that position. She should step down and allow someone QUALIFIED and INTELLIGENT to run things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Basileus Basileon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm pretty sure he doesn't fear impeachment.
He knows the Democrats aren't stupid enough to start a media circus of a fight they're bound to lose in the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lazyriver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Maybe, but I bet he fears the investigations necessary to the
process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Basileus Basileon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Absolutely he does.
And that would be how impeachment would have to be presented--not that we intend to convict, but that it is required to force him to comply with investigations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nuntius_Barbari Donating Member (29 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 03:24 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Congress would not begin an impeachment process...
...just to allow the investigation. They would expect that action to adversely effect them more than it would the Bush Administration. You might be delighted with what is found out, and it could be important but the odds are against it being worth what would come back on Congress for doing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. there will be civil prosecution after the next election, where he cant be pardoned
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Not likely, sorry
Without impeachment there will be no prosecution/accountability of any kind. There need not be conviction/removal, but without at least objection/accusation all acts of the regime are "approved" by complicit DC-Dems who have put their oaths of office "off the table."

That is the simple, sad reality.

--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. they dont 'sign' their oaths of office,so when caught they plea to impersonating a judge, etc which
is a misdemeanor... i dont think any ever sign it.. i did a study for a paper, never found a state official that signed theirs.. not even the attorney general of the state
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. I think Bush is pretty interested in the results of the current FISA debate...
just saying.
it is a perfect time to act loudly against immunity and blanket warrants....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faryn Balyncd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
10. reinforce
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC