Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why is McClurkin supporting Obama at all?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 06:23 PM
Original message
Why is McClurkin supporting Obama at all?
This part I don't get. And can't find anywhere on the net.

If Obama is against everything McClurkin stands for... at at least as far as McClurkin's signature isssue goes.... what's the big attraction there for McClurkin?

Doesn't he realize that Obama will... if taken at his word... undermine everything MkC. stands for?

Doesn't quite add up.

Side note: anyone else having trouble with this dude's last name? Or is it just one more thing for me to worry about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. clurk, clurk, clurk, clurk
a bird of a different feather altogether, I think.

What IS the attraction?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. I've brought this up before
Apparently he's Oprah's friend, so that may be one reason why. It is susicious though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Suspicious how? This is starting to get silly.
Is McClurkin a secret spy for the Republicans?

Is McClurkin working to brainwash Obama?

Is he carrying a secret message from Oprah to Obama and the only way they could get together was to have him sing for Obama's Gospel tour?

Maybe Obama is the secret candidate of the fundies out to take over the country!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemFemme Donating Member (315 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. LOL n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Basileus Basileon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. He likely places spreading the Gospel as his highest priority.
Edited on Thu Oct-25-07 06:31 PM by Basileus Basileon
He considers a ban on homosexuality to be part of the Gospel, but not the only part by any means. Obama is a man of faith, and is giving him a platform to sing his message of dedication to God and love of Man (but not in that way) to an audience of shared faith. Perhaps he sees Obama's invitation as giving him tacit approval and legitimization as well*. Either way, religious people often look past differences in particulars when collaborating for a shared religious goal.


*I think Obama should drop him for this reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Theology is not my strong point; but....
>>He considers a ban on homosexuality to be part of the Gospel, but not the only part by any means. >>>

I don't know how he could point to the Gospel ( if you mean the published works of Mathew, Mark ,Luke and John; universally recognized that there is no mention of homosexuality there. Never mind if you mean "Gospel" in some more general, more broad sense)as supporting a ban on homosexuality.

>>>Perhaps he sees Obama's invitation as giving him tacit approval and legitimization as well*. Either way, religious people often look past differences in particulars when collaborating for a shared religious goal.>>>>

Hmmm....it wouldn't seem that they have a whole lot to share.... goal-wise.


>>*I think Obama should drop him for this reason.>>

On this we agree. Why he hasn't already is a bit of yet another puzzle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Basileus Basileon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Well, by "the Gospel" I do mean
Edited on Thu Oct-25-07 06:59 PM by Basileus Basileon
the four books. However, most Christians consider Paul's writings to be completely essential to understanding the character and message of the Gospel; hence their inclusion in the New Testament. I disagree (despite my Orthodox upbringing, hence the name), but it's still the belief of most Christians.

I would disagree that they have little to share. In this case, they're sharing the message of Jesus Christ. They may disagree on homosexuality, but they certainly agree on the importance of faith in one's life. To the GLBT community, the former is more important. To McClurkin, it would seem shared faith is.

I really couldn't tell you why he hasn't. I'm very surprised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Perhaps. But you seem to be speculating.
>>>would disagree that they have little to share. In this case, they're sharing the message of Jesus Christ. They may disagree on homosexuality, but they certainly agree on the importance of faith in one's life. To the GLBT community, the former is more important. To McClurkin, it would seem shared faith is.>>>

Has McClurkin actually explained any of this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Basileus Basileon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Oh, I'm certainly speculating.
Hence the words, "perhaps" and "seem" when I'm discussing his motivations. I'm just giving my best guesses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Nelson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oprah
Oprah
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. Oprah?
Oprah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. he's probably getting paid to sing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. He probably wants Obama to be the candidate he has a right to
if he wants. Just because he hates gays he can like Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. How do you know he "undermines everything McClurkin stands for."
Perhaps McClurkin stands for universal health care and diplomacy with Iran for all you know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. It's 'splained in the preceding paragraph:
"If Obama is against everything McClurkin stands for... at at least as far as McClurkin's signature isssue goes.... what's the big attraction there for McClurkin?"



>>>Perhaps McClurkin stands for universal health care and diplomacy with Iran for all you know.>>>

That's just it: I DON'T know. Can you shed any light?




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LadyAziz Donating Member (274 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
15. Maybe he has a new album coming out
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
16. Why do many left-leaning women support Senator Clinton?
Nah...just a coincidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Because they don't know she stands for pro-war status quo?
that IS a coincidence

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Basileus Basileon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. That 100% NARAL rating probably has something to do with it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Nat'l Family Planning & Reproductive Health: Biden, Clinton, Dodd 93%; Edwards, Kucinich, Obama 100%
Guess they didn't see this one...

Biden, Dodd, Edwards, Kucinich and Obama all get 100% from NARAL, too.

Then there's that 93% from the AFL-CIO, but since the subject was women, I'll leave that for another post...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
19. Another mystery: McClurkin is gay, so how exactly does that appease a "homophobic"
crowd again?

The reason for all these mysteries? Everyone is reading too much into this. The guy was invited because he can sing. He accepted because he is an egocentric who loves to perform and get paid. Nothing more or less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. He appeases any homophobic crowd
by telling them that he's cured himself of his homosexuality, and others can do it too. It's like mother's milk to the gay-bashers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Ya lost me.
He says he WAS gay. Says he's not gay anymore. Say's being gay is a curse. Says gays kill children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC