Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

if Kerry wins will Delay and Frist control him for 4 years?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 04:48 PM
Original message
if Kerry wins will Delay and Frist control him for 4 years?
We know that Kerry casts votes for political expedience. In another thread, this was the explanation for his "yes" vote on IWR. Kerry also voted for the Patriot Act, didn't vote against the medicare bill and has not ruled out supporting an amendment banning gay marriage.

If he votes this way because he is worried about being called a liberal, how do we know he won't continue to do that for four years, worried about his own reelection? How do we know he won't sign RW legislation becuase Delay and Frist tell him "it's popular" or "the swing voters approve" ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KissMyAsscroft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well, he will have a position of higher power...


So he won't have to capitulate. If he does, than fuck him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. but the RW can control him by holding the
"popularity" meme over his head. Would Kerry veto something that was wrong even if he saw polls showing it was popular?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. All depends on targetted grass-roots effort. Wish Dean supporters were
Edited on Thu Feb-19-04 04:53 PM by WiseMen
really interesting in helping in the fight. They would be totally
welcome, and the country would be grateful -- a real legacy to
Dr. Dean's effort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. If Kerry would apologize for his IWR vote
I'll gladly help


I'm not holding my breath though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poskonig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I question this.
I started a thread a few months ago asking the community if they would change their vote if Kerry apologized for the IWR. The answer was overwhelmingly no. I suspect people just want Kerry to grab his ankles on an issue or two to soften him up for whatever candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuminousX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Much like the ancient days of Celtic warfare
battlelines are manned by champions and clans. Kerry is the champion for his clan and will be leading the main assault. You may want the Dean supporters in that group but we don't respond well to Kerry's style. Dean supporters will be in the battle, just not side-by-side with Kerry. There are many skirmishes to be fought to win the day. And when the sun does set and we count our numbers and patch our wounds we will stand side-by-side with the Kerry clan and swear our oaths of fealty as Democrats, and then depart.

Our enemy is common to us, but our methods and sidegoals are different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoneStarLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. Simple Answer: Take Back The Senate and No Problem
Delay was, is, and will run things in the House no matter if Bob Graham, Carol Moseley-Braun, Joe Lieberman, Wes Clark, Howard Dean, Al Sharpton, Dennis Kucinich, John Edwards, or John Kerry would have been or are elected President. We can cut into his control in the House, but unless we beat him in the election (in which case we'll get a slightly less evil CONservative), the Republicans have too big an advantage to overcome. So that's a moot point in my opinion.

We can take back the Senate. Take back the Senate and you don't have to worry about this question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paulie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Unless there is a surge like 92
If we get the Pres, then we should get other Dems elected, just in the backlash effect.

As long as there is a Dem on the ballot, we have a shot at ANYTHING!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poskonig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. Clearly not.
*Kerry*, not Bush, would have the bully pulpit and would use the leverage effectively.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC