|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
mod mom
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:29 PM Original message |
Carl Bernstein: Hillary Will Continue Bush's Legacy of Secrecy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:31 PM Response to Original message |
1. Sounds like a chicken or egg deal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:34 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. People with a fear of being humiliated do not run for President. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:36 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. The "secretive" part is not up for debate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:38 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Maybe it's a reaction to having her underwear drawer searched. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:41 PM Response to Reply #10 |
20. Sounds humiliating |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:43 PM Response to Reply #10 |
30. Presidents and Presidential Candidates are not entitled to privacy.If you can't stand the heat get |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hisownpetard
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:43 PM Response to Reply #5 |
27. Really? Remember Nixon? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrFunkenstein
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 07:33 PM Response to Reply #5 |
102. They Run Very Cautious Campaigns |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive
![]() |
Thu Oct-25-07 07:18 AM Response to Reply #5 |
104. HuffPo runs an anti-Clinton oped almost everyday. (Not sayin' they're biased, but...) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:31 PM Response to Original message |
2. It Is Very Sad, Ma'am, How A Once Respectable Reporter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:36 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. It is indeed sad that Carl Bernstein is the only reporter with the guts to tell the "truth" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:39 PM Response to Reply #7 |
13. So glad you remembered to put "truth" in quotes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:40 PM Response to Reply #7 |
18. He Sold Out, Ma'am, With The Hack "Biographical Expose' Earlier This Year |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:46 PM Response to Reply #18 |
34. I disagree.If anything some do not want the truth exposed.The fact that it is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:52 PM Response to Reply #34 |
43. This Is Not A Fact, Ma'am, It Is Psycho-Babble |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:54 PM Response to Reply #43 |
46. Nonsense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:58 PM Response to Reply #46 |
49. You Might want To Back that Up, Ma'am |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 05:15 PM Response to Reply #49 |
71. What would lead you to believe Bernstein has never met or 'socialized with Hillary? I am sure he has |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 05:18 PM Response to Reply #71 |
74. He Could Not Get An Interview, Ma'am |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 05:24 PM Response to Reply #74 |
77. Many biographers do not get to "interview" their subjects and that has little to do with the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 05:28 PM Response to Reply #77 |
80. True, the latest Lincoln biographer did not interview Lincoln |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 05:33 PM Response to Reply #80 |
86. One of the newer Lincoln biographers has concluded Lincoln was Manic Depressive and another that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 05:44 PM Response to Reply #86 |
89. And There Is No Reason To Take Either Statement Seriously, Ma'am |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 05:48 PM Response to Reply #86 |
90. Do you know those authors names? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 06:43 PM Response to Reply #90 |
95. I can't remember.I must be senile but it was a couple of months ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 06:54 PM Response to Reply #95 |
97. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 07:00 PM Response to Reply #97 |
99. Here are the books. I looked them up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 07:09 PM Response to Reply #99 |
101. OK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 05:28 PM Response to Reply #77 |
81. Again, Ma'am, A Statement Like This |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 05:31 PM Response to Reply #81 |
83. That may simply be the conclusion he has reached through his observations and the opinions of those |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 05:39 PM Response to Reply #83 |
88. It Is Psychiatric In Nature, Ma'am |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elizm
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 05:32 PM Response to Reply #7 |
85. Hopefully others will follow to stop this trainwreck. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Thu Oct-25-07 11:16 AM Response to Reply #7 |
106. Agreed.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:38 PM Response to Reply #2 |
11. With all due respect, Magistrate, Michael Isikoff is also writing of Clinton Secrecy: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:40 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. With no due respect, Isikoff made his money off of Monica |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:40 PM Response to Reply #11 |
17. Absolutely. It's also important to throw meat to hyenas. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:42 PM Response to Reply #11 |
25. Isikoff is A Scaife Operative, Ma'am, Bought And Sold A Decade Back And More |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:43 PM Response to Reply #25 |
28. Don't give them any ideas!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:50 PM Response to Reply #25 |
40. Like Hillary is a Murdoch product? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:53 PM Response to Reply #40 |
44. That, Ma'am, Is Well Beneath Your Accustomed Standard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:59 PM Response to Reply #44 |
50. No it's not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 05:01 PM Response to Reply #44 |
52. .And I resent a reporter of the caliber of Mr.Bernstein being |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 05:02 PM Response to Reply #52 |
54. All of a sudden, criticism is A Bad Thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 05:06 PM Response to Reply #54 |
61. Because Bernstein is worthy of my respect.I do not respect Hillary. And I see no reason for me too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 05:08 PM Response to Reply #61 |
64. So "worthy of YOUR respect" mean we can't criticize him? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 05:10 PM Response to Reply #64 |
68. Just as you seem to think it is wrong to criticize Hillary? No YOU can criticize him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 05:17 PM Response to Reply #68 |
72. Deleted message |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 05:04 PM Response to Reply #52 |
56. Mr. Bernstien, Ma'am, Is A Sold-Out Hack |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 05:08 PM Response to Reply #56 |
63. You are entitled to your opinion.I disagree.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 05:12 PM Response to Reply #63 |
69. Of Course,Ma'am: If We All Always Agreed, This Would Be A Damned Boring Place.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:47 PM Response to Reply #2 |
36. I like that analogy of "the caboose of this old train" regarding the Clinton nomination |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan
![]() |
Thu Oct-25-07 11:30 PM Response to Reply #36 |
107. Hillary is pulling a train?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fresh_Start
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:49 PM Response to Reply #2 |
39. yup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:32 PM Response to Original message |
3. And is this what some want in a President? Damn I hope she loses the Primary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:35 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. But you ALWAYS hope she'll lose the primary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:38 PM Response to Reply #6 |
12. That is true. I am always amazed that this candidate is even worse than I thought.She never |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:41 PM Response to Reply #12 |
21. Maybe she's "senile" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:48 PM Response to Reply #21 |
37. Nah.She is to vicious and politically "expedient' to be senile.She "knows" what she is doing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:50 PM Response to Reply #37 |
41. No, no. Now you have to give an example of "vicious." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:53 PM Response to Reply #41 |
45. I am not going there..It is a worthless debate with a"true believer".. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 05:01 PM Response to Reply #45 |
53. You believe right wing shills, call McGovern "senile" and claim you're "concerned" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:42 PM Response to Reply #12 |
24. What secrets do you think she still has? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:51 PM Response to Reply #24 |
42. Well, then, why is she so fearful? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 05:04 PM Response to Reply #42 |
55. Maybe she's "senile" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 05:18 PM Response to Reply #55 |
73. Indeed not.I questiioned McGovern's "judgement'. I have never questioned Hillary's.She is totally |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 05:22 PM Response to Reply #73 |
76. You called McGovern "senile" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 05:27 PM Response to Reply #76 |
78. Because I respected McGovern and would hope I was not mistaken. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 05:29 PM Response to Reply #78 |
82. Wow, what a way to show respect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 05:32 PM Response to Reply #78 |
84. But It Would Be Much Simpler, Ma'am |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 05:37 PM Response to Reply #84 |
87. Ah well, I shall just have to admit that the first candidate I ever supported is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 05:50 PM Response to Reply #87 |
92. Not so hard, was it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 06:42 PM Response to Reply #92 |
94. It was very hard.I have to acknowledge that one of my idols has feet of clay. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 06:56 PM Response to Reply #94 |
98. I can understand that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 07:02 PM Response to Reply #98 |
100. Thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Totally Committed
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:33 PM Response to Original message |
4. That's why... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:43 PM Response to Reply #4 |
29. Deleted message |
Forkboy
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 05:01 PM Response to Reply #29 |
51. Unless someone commandeers your body while in the booth, no one can tell you who to vote for. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OrangeCountyDemocrat
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 05:06 PM Response to Reply #51 |
59. None Of The Above |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 05:07 PM Response to Reply #59 |
62. No problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:44 PM Response to Reply #4 |
33. I hope we can put a monkey-wrench in that cycle of nepotism and cronyism. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 05:06 PM Response to Reply #4 |
58. Everybody is suspicious to you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:38 PM Response to Original message |
9. She may or may not ,but I have a tough taking his word for it anymore. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:40 PM Response to Reply #9 |
19. Why would ANY democrat listen and believe Bernstein? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:42 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. Why wouldn't they? He isn't a sellout like Woodward. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:44 PM Response to Reply #23 |
31. Bwahahaha!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OrangeCountyDemocrat
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:44 PM Response to Reply #19 |
32. Bernstein Is One Of Us |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:47 PM Response to Reply #32 |
35. "One of us." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:54 PM Response to Reply #19 |
47. Do you know his history? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 05:09 PM Response to Reply #47 |
66. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
14. Where did he buy his crystal ball? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hell Hath No Fury
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
15. This meshes completely... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hisownpetard
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 05:54 PM Response to Reply #15 |
93. HEY! I'm a Scorpio, and I resent that!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:41 PM Response to Original message |
22. i think this is worthy of concern |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:42 PM Response to Original message |
26. More right wing tripe from the Hillary Haters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fresh_Start
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:49 PM Response to Original message |
38. Carl Berstein could turn back into a reporter-equally unlikely event |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bitwit1234
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 04:55 PM Response to Original message |
48. Gee what book is Bernstein selling now. Bash Hillary one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 05:04 PM Response to Original message |
57. "A Woman in Charge," by Carl Bernstein, has sold about 57,000 of the 275,000 copies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 05:08 PM Response to Reply #57 |
65. He's turned into a hack |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Thu Oct-25-07 01:45 AM Response to Reply #65 |
103. He is not a 'hack".You just don't like his conclusions. If you read the book you would realize he |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 05:28 PM Response to Reply #57 |
79. If we judge the quality of a book by numbers sold Anne Coulter should get a Pulitzer! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hisownpetard
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 05:06 PM Response to Original message |
60. Thanks to Bush's psychotic administration and their supreme deviousness, I think one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 05:09 PM Response to Original message |
67. why would Hillary and not Bill? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ronnykmarshall
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 05:14 PM Response to Original message |
70. He can just shove it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 05:21 PM Response to Original message |
75. Of course, she's secretive.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 05:49 PM Response to Original message |
91. I've lost all respect for Bernstein |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MasonJar
![]() |
Wed Oct-24-07 06:50 PM Response to Original message |
96. Unfortunately Bernstein is no longer credible. Not as bad as his former |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hell Hath No Fury
![]() |
Thu Oct-25-07 11:06 AM Response to Reply #96 |
105. As a matter of fact, he has. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Thu Oct-25-07 11:40 PM Response to Original message |
108. Last Month's Atlantic Monthly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackORoses
![]() |
Fri Oct-26-07 01:03 AM Response to Reply #108 |
109. why won't they release the documents detailing her activities as First Lady? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Fri Oct-26-07 01:39 AM Response to Reply #109 |
110. You want Wal-Mart to be forced to release their |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackORoses
![]() |
Fri Oct-26-07 10:45 AM Response to Reply #110 |
111. Your not interested in knowing what she was doing on the board of Wal-mart the 6 years up to 1992? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mon May 06th 2024, 10:19 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC