Zogby poll of who people would never vote for

[illinoisprogressive]

While she is winning wide support in nationwide samples among Democrats in the race for their party’s presidential nomination, half of likely voters nationwide said they would never vote for New York Sen. Hillary Clinton, a new Zogby Interactive poll shows.

The online survey of 9,718 likely voters nationwide showed that 50% said Clinton would never get their presidential vote. This is up from 46% who said they could never vote for Clinton in a Zogby International telephone survey conducted in early March. Older voters are most resistant to Clinton – 59% of those age 65 and older said they would never vote for the New York senator, but she is much more acceptable to younger voters: 42% of those age 18–29 said they would never vote for Clinton for President.

Whom would you NEVER vote for for President of the U.S.?


%

Clinton (D)


50%

Kucinich (D)


49%

Gravel (D)


47%

Paul (R)


47%

Brownback (R)


47%

Tancredo (R)


46%

McCain (R)


45%

Hunter (R)


44%

Giuliani (R)


43%

Romney (R)


42%

Edwards (D)


42%

Thompson (R)


41%

Dodd (D)


41%

Biden (D)


40%

Obama (D)


37%

Huckabee (R)


35%

Richardson (D)


34%

Not sure


4%

At the other end of the scale, Republican Mike Huckabee and Democrats Bill Richardson and Barack Obama faired best, as they were least objectionable to likely voters. Richardson was forever objectionable as President to 34%, while 35% said they could never vote for Huckabee and 37% said they would never cast a presidential ballot for Obama, the survey showed.

The Zogby Interactive poll, conducted Oct. 11–15, 2007, included 9,718 likely voters nationwide and carries a margin of error of +/– 1.0 percentage point.

In a Zogby International telephone survey conducted in March, 46% said they would never vote for Clinton. In that survey, she finished in second place, behind Republican Newt Gingrich, a divisive figure who has since announced he would not seek the presidency and was not included in this new online survey. In that earlier poll, 54% said they would never vote for Gingrich. This recent survey included only the 17 candidates who were at that time running for President in one of the major parties. Former Vice President Al Gore, who like Gingrich was also included in the earlier Zogby survey of who would never win voters’ support for the White House, was excluded from this latest survey because of his insistence that he has no interest in a run for the presidency.

Interest in a Gore candidacy has been rekindled after he recently won the Nobel Prize for peace in connection with his work on the issue of global climate change.

Kansas Sen. Sam Brownback, who announced Friday he would end his campaign, was included in the poll. He might have sensed the nationwide opposition to his campaign, as 47% said they would never vote for him for President. The survey showed he was tied as the third most objectionable candidate, behind Clinton and Congressman Dennis Kucinich (49%). Tied with Brownback was Democrat Michael Gravel, a former Alaska senator, and GOP Congressman Ron Paul.

Opposition to Clinton among Democratic and Republican women revealed mirror opposite attitudes, the Zogby Interactive survey showed. While 83% of Republican women said they would never vote for her, just 17% said they could possibly cast a ballot for her. Among Democratic women, just 17% said they would never vote for Hillary, while 83% said they could.

Democratic women appear smitten by former Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina and Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois – just 11% said they could never vote for them for President. Republican women, on the other hand, find former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney most attractive – just 14% said they would never vote for him. Tied for a close second was former Tennessee Sen. Fred Thompson and former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, who were found to be objectionable by just 15% of Republican women.



http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1376

[baldguy]

1. Well, we really need to court the festering cesspool of hatred vote. Don't we?

[BobRossi]

2. Gosh, I'm shocked!

Not! The Dems are even more clueless than in 2004. How depressing.

[msongs]

3. this ONLINE poll has been around the block a few days or so :-) nt

[DemocratSinceBirth]

4. People Involved In Research Have A Saying

GIGO

[Cleita]

5. Not only around the block but swinging its purse

under the lamp post in fishnet stockings.

[TwilightGardener]

6. Romney is at 43%? Where's that slick-used-car-salesman hatred when you need it?

I find it weird that he's one percentage point worse than Edwards. I thought no one would vote for a Mormon? And Fred Thompson is the same as Edwards? I don't know what to think. I'm glad Obama does well, though, as well as Richardson--especially considering they're minorities.

[Adelante]

7. I think Huckabee's going to be their nominee

So I'm glad to see Obama where he is there.

[TwilightGardener]

8. I don't think so. Hucksterbee won't withstand close scrutiny--right now

the GOP is "honeymooning" over him because Fred Thompson is tanking and they're still not sold on Rudy and Romney. It was only a few months ago that there were people on DU proclaiming Thompson to be the "best" of the GOPer candidates, and that he would be impossible to beat--before they knew anything about him or heard some of his positions and speeches--that's where we're at with Huck. My hope is that the GOP nominates Huckabee without actually vetting him, and then they're stuck with him, because he's essentially George Bush Lite--another phony "compassionate conservative"--but it isn't likely to happen. They'll wise up and go with Mittens or Rudy, both of whom might give Hillary some real trouble, although I think she can beat them. I REALLY believe Obama can beat them much more handily, though!

[Adelante]

9. I'll bet you five

:D

[TwilightGardener]

11. I'll take that bet!

[Rhythm and Blue]

10. I'd be shocked that half of Americans have even heard of

Kucinich, Paul, and Gravel, especially to the point where they'd confidently say they'd never ever vote for them.

[Clintonista2]

12. It was an online poll, that's why

It's no more factually accurate than a DU straw poll.