Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Only Bad Numbers for Clinton Are on the Calendar

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 10:27 AM
Original message
The Only Bad Numbers for Clinton Are on the Calendar
In fact, it’s hard to find a poll of the Democratic race where Clinton is anywhere but on top. Rasmussen Reports shows her leading nationally, in Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, and Florida.

Not only that, as her lead has grown, she is also seen as the most electable Democrat—50% of Democratic voters say Clinton is Very Likely to win it all if she is nominated. Another 31% say she is Somewhat Likely to win. No other candidate, in either party, comes close to those numbers.

For the seven days ending October 21, 2007, Hillary Clinton earns 46% of the vote. Barack Obama is second at 24% followed by John Edwards at 11%. Bill Richardson attracts 3% while Dennis Kucinich at 3% and Joe Biden at 2%. Chris Dodd is at 1% and Mike Gravel a bit below that level while 9% of Likely Democratic Primary Voters are undecided (review history of weekly results).

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/2008_democratic_presidential_primary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. She might win
But I still hate her politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. I believe America is starting to get used to the idea of having a Hillary presidency.
She's smart, competent and unshakable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. The Iowa poll numbers are probably the most surprising.
Personally, I didn't think she'd have a lead anywhere near this soon, if at all.

That being said, Iowa is difficult to predict, of course. In '04, most voters didn't make up their minds until the last few days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU9598 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. We won't again
Iowans make up their minds late. Last time I was John Edwards from the day he announced, so that was odd for me.

Hillary is running scared in Iowa ... and that is a good thing for her. If she does not campaign like she is down 10 points here, she will lose. But, all the time for Hillary here in Iowa will pay off for her in November if she is the nominee. Iowa is a purple state that is luckily turning more and more blue. Whomever the nominee is, the time spent here pre-caucus will help a lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Frankly, I don't see any evidence that she's "running scared"
She's spending a lot of time in Iowa, but I don't think it's because she's "running scared". I think it's because she can afford to spend a lot of time there, from a tactical perspective. Her leads in some of the other early primary states are pretty significant, so they may not require quite as much attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. "running scared" is just so much rubbish from contenders and pretenders
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Edwards is running scared in Iowa,
Edited on Mon Oct-22-07 11:21 AM by seasonedblue
it shows in the way he's ratched up his attacks, and in the way Mudcat's out dredging for the 'bubba' vote. (his words, not mine)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
8. Nice to have the hard decisions already made.
So we don't have to worry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC