Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NY Times Editorial Blisters Congressional Dems For FISA Cave-In

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 08:59 AM
Original message
NY Times Editorial Blisters Congressional Dems For FISA Cave-In



http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/horsesmouth/


NY Times Editorial Blisters Congressional Dems For FISA Cave-In


October 20, 2007 -- 2:02 PM EST // link //
The other day I noted that the New York Times editorial page doesn't get the Web credit it deserves for being a voice of sanity at key moments when much of the opinion-making elite is either opting for the comfort of self-delusion or is simply AWOL.

Well, today's Times brings an important new editorial that tidily makes this point. It absolutely blisters the Senate intelligence committee for its FISA cave-in. More important, it supplies the necessary larger context for understanding what's happening -- specifically, that all too many Dem Congressional leaders are still nursing hangovers from their minority days and are acting as if the 2006 decision by voters to put them in control of Congress just never happened:

With Democrats Like These...

Every now and then, we are tempted to double-check that the Democrats actually won control of Congress last year. It was particularly hard to tell this week. Democratic leaders were cowed, once again, by propaganda from the White House and failed, once again, to modernize the law on electronic spying in a way that permits robust intelligence gathering on terrorists without undermining the Constitution.

We were left wondering who is really in charge, when in a bipartisan press release announcing the agreement, the ranking Republican on the Senate Intelligence Committee, Kit Bond, described the bill as “a delicate arrangement of compromises” that could not be changed in any way. The committee’s chairman, Jay Rockefeller, didn’t object.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EV_Ares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. It really is difficult to understand. I just wish the dems would take the
stand they know or feel is right and stick with it and stand up to Bush & the republicans. You can handle losing a battle but at least attempt to fight them on it and I think they would gain a lot more respect. It is up to the people if they want change to vote the republicans out so the dems can get a better majority to make the necessary changes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. delictae... the changes were written by the Bush team. There is no part of the compromise
which is good for the country, the people or the democrats. This is a nightmare bill. As bad as any congress has signed in the past 7 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLib at work Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-22-07 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. That is why the approval rating for Congress sucks. The Dems are NOT doing what they were elected to
do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC