Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Zogby: Bush ahead in red states, Kerry barely ahead in blue states

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ringmastery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 06:22 PM
Original message
Zogby: Bush ahead in red states, Kerry barely ahead in blue states
Edited on Wed Feb-18-04 06:23 PM by ringmastery
The polls are everywhere. This certainly doesn't jive with CNN Gallup.

http://www.zogby.com/news/021804.html

Bush Leads in Red States, Kerry Ahead in Blue States
Voters Hardened on the Economy, War, Gays Marriage

A new poll conducted by Zogby International for The O’Leary Report and Southern Methodist University’s John Tower Center from February 12-15, 2004 of 1,209 likely voters with a margin of error of +/- 2.8 percentage points found that if the election for president were held today, Democrat John Kerry would edge George W. Bush 46% to 45% in the “blue states” – or states won by Al Gore in the 2000 election. In the “red states,” or states won by George W. Bush in 2000, however, Bush wins handily by a 51% to 39% margin.

In terms of right direction/wrong direction, blue state voters felt the country was headed in the wrong direction by a 47% to 45% margin while red state voters felt the country was headed in the right direction by a 50% to 40% margin, according to an additional Zogby International/O’Leary Report/John Tower Center survey of Red States/Blue States conducted from February 12-15, 2004 of 532 likely Blue State voters and 543 likely Red State voters with a margin of error of + 4.3 percentage points found that.

Forty-seven percent of blue state voters rated Bush’s job performance as good or excellent while 51% said the president’s job performance was only fair or poor. Fifty-five percent of red states, however, rated the president’s performance and good or excellent while 45% had a fair or poor opinion of the President’s job performance.

On the issue of a strong economy and low unemployment versus job creation, Blue State voters who feel a strong economy is a bigger priority than job creation by a 50% to 40% margin while Red State voters also agreed by a 48% to 40% margin a 49% to 40% margin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. So even if those 1,209 came from just 10 'strategic' states
that's only 120 voters from each. How the hell can you do a poll like this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TruthIsAll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. This Blue-Red state is BS: Zogby contradicts his own polls - here's
In the latest Zogby polls, a Dem beats Bush 45-41; and it's 48-41 that Bush does not deserve to be reelected.

How does this jibe with the Blue/Red numbers? Not one bit!

Bush is toast!

Zogby America Poll. Jan. 15-18, 2004. N=1,000 likely voters nationwide. MoE ± 3.2.


"If the election for president were held today, for whom would you vote: the Republican George W. Bush or the Democratic candidate?" Options rotated. Trend includes slight variations in wording.

George W. Bush Democrat Other(vol.) NotSure
% % % %
1/15-18/04 41 45 2 12
12/15-17/03 47 42 2 9
12/4-6/03 43 41 3 13
11/3-5/03 41 41 2 16
10/15-18/03 43 45 1 12
9/22-24/03 41 45 3 12
9/3-5/03 39 47 3 11
8/16-19/03 43 42 2 13
7/16-17/03 47 44 1 8
6/6-10/03 44 37 3 16
3/03 48 38 2 13
.

"Do you think George W. Bush deserves to be reelected as president of the United States, or is it time for someone new?" Trend includes slight variations in wording.

.

Deserves Reelection Someone New Not Sure
% % %
1/15-18/04 41 48 10
12/15-17/03 45 47 8
12/4-6/03 44 46 10
11/3-5/03 43 49 8
10/15-18/03 42 50 8
9/22-24/03 43 49 8
9/3-5/03 40 52 8
8/16-19/03 45 48 8
7/16-17/03 46 47 6
6/6-10/03 49 38 13
1/24-26/03 49 41 10
1/4-6/03 51 36 13
10/02 49 35 16
7/02 47 32 21
6/02 51 28 20

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Unfortunately, we can't run "Unnamed Democrat" against Bush.
We can't run "Someone New" against Bush either. We have to put a person in there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. you are the numbers maven here TIA
I am sure you are right. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Casablanca Donating Member (549 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. This is also month-old data ...
A month separated Howard Dean from dangerous insurgent to has-been. Don't think it can't happen, or hasn't happened, to Kerry.

Zogby was the most accurate in the Lewinsky affair, and stood against the media poll outlets in its reporting. I consider their credibility among pollsters to be above par.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nederland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #17
28. But Bush Isn't Running
...at least, that's what I remember you saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. FWIW
when I was a Zogby participant, the sample had Republicans overrepresented. (You could see the cumulative results after you had filled out the questionnairel.) That still may be true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoneStarLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's Closer But Still Uphill Considering MoE
Hmmm...quite interesting.

It's a lot closer if you consider MoE is 4.3.

Still, we need to put in some work in the Midwest and Florida.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xray s Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is bull
The poll methodology is bogus. Red state vs blue state in aggregate is meaningless. You have to break it down state by state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. There are other problems as well with this poll and with polls
in general. For example, how did Zogby identify "likely voters?" Did he take into account the possibility that the polling places will be overrun with pissed people who didn't vote in 2000?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Merusault Donating Member (173 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. You're right............
Zogby is taking red swing states (i.e. florida, missouri, ohio, nevada, N.H.) and lumping them in with solid red states (i.e. the south and mountain west), which is obviously takes the stats out of the proper perspective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jawja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. Florida
is a red "stolen" state.

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemMother Donating Member (422 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. O'Leary Report--something fishy
This is bull. It seems to be part of a survey done for this guy (I found a description of him on World Net):

"Bradley S. O'Leary


Bradley S. O’Leary has been involved in politics for more than twenty-five years, and his newsletter, the O’Leary Report, is one of the most influential publications in American politics. More than sixty senators and congressmen have been his clients, including Senators Bob Dole and Howard Baker. His NBC radio show ran for seven years, and he has also been a contributing columnist for USA Today Weekend magazine. O’Leary is currently president of Associated Television News in Los Angeles."


Do a search and check out Associated Television News. I didn't have time to do anything comprehensive--still googling.

And I've completely forgotten what World Net is? Right wing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. World Net Daily?
Edited on Wed Feb-18-04 06:43 PM by lancdem
RW news source. BTW, Zogby does tons of polls for clients with an agenda, with results that almost always favor that group's POV. I take his Reuters polls most seriously because Reuters is nonpartisan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #5
26. Hi DemMother!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaddenedDem Donating Member (447 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
9. Watching Kerry supporters chew their arms off
Calling Zogby all kinds of name when a few weeks ago, they were swearing by him!!!!!

Now he's all kinds of wrong when his poll goes against Kerry. But during Iowa he was on a pedestal so high I'm surprized he didn't get a nose bleed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemMother Donating Member (422 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. read the above
When Zogby is working for a biased client you have to take that into account when you examine the results. This seems to be part of an overall "values" poll that is being done for O'Leary who clearly has right wing leanings. I'm neither for nor against Kerry. In fact I rarely post on any thread other than ABB or general interest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xray s Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Zogby will sell you anything you want to hear
Edited on Wed Feb-18-04 06:57 PM by xray s
I think he can come up with pretty accurate polls. On the other hand, if you ask him to do a bogus poll lumping all red states in one pile and all blue states in another, he is more than happy to take your money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cryofan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
10. This is why an Edwards-Kerry ticket beats a Kerry-Edwards ticket
better to get edwards at the top of the ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bornskeptic Donating Member (951 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Why? There's no data here on Edwards.
In fact, I believe every national poll since the Iowa caucuses in which Bush/Kerry and Bush/Edwards matchups were included, Kerry has done better than Edwards. If you know of an exception, I'd sincerely like to hear about it, since I hate being inaccurate.

Actually, even if this is meaningful, averaging blue states and red states would leave Kerry within 4 or 5 points of Bush, which would normally be considered excellent for a challenger running against an incumbent this early in an election year.

http://www.pollingreport.com/wh04gen.htm

http://www.gallup.com/content/default.asp?ci=10531
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anti-NAFTA Donating Member (900 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Because free trade is a more important issue
in the South and the battleground states than Kerry's military service. Sorry. ;(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Champion Jack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
14. What were Zogbys predictions on the vote last night?
Didn't he predict a landslide for Kerry with Edwards a distanst 2nd?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. It was even more...
off than that. He had Kerry ahead by a huge margin, with Dean in second (23%) and Edwards in third (20%).

I personally have never taken his polls seriously. They haven't been very accurate in this primary season.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
16. Zogby preparing Edwards "electability" PR
Wait for polls before the primaries: Edwards beats Bush. kerry who?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoctorBombay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
21. Entirely too small a sample to mean anything.
1209 is a decent sample for popular vote, but it's too small to be broken down into blue state/red state categories.

And, if only 10 states were used, the blues could have been close states like New Mexico and Iowa and the reds could have been states like Idaho and Utah, places we have no shot in.

I love how the map on the page on the link is tilted to the red states appear much bigger and the blues look even smaller. Almost like that crap on Limbaugh's site that had the 2000 results by county.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. Good analysis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
24. Another Zogby corporate sponsored push poll. Look at the ad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atlant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
27. I'm shocked, shocked I say.
> Democrat John Kerry would edge George W. Bush 46% to 45% in the “blue
> states” – or states won by Al Gore in the 2000 election. In the “red
> states,” or states won by George W. Bush in 2000, however, Bush wins
> handily by a 51% to 39% margin.

I'm shocked, shocked I say. Anyone, *ANYONE* who thinks *ANY* of our
candidates is going to win in the Bush strongholds (where the issues
are God, Guns, and Gays 24x7) is going to be very sadly disappointed
on Wednesday morning, November 3rd.

And with a nice, safe middle-of-the-roader like Kerry, with no real
fire in his belly and no real hard-and-fast positions about anything,
those blue states will be heavily contended-for as well.

Atlant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC