Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton -53% Obama 20% Edwards 13%

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 05:54 AM
Original message
Clinton -53% Obama 20% Edwards 13%
http://www.pollingreport.com/wh08dem.htm

I understand the theory that if Obama manages to win Iowa he will have so much momentum that he can overcome Clinton's lead in the national polls which would presumably translate into victories for him in primary states down the line... Intuitively that has some appeal but intuitively it's also hard to believe that so many folks will not vote for Clinton just because she lost Iowa...

If I remember correctly Bush Pere won some early primaries in 1980 and thought that would catapult him into the nomination...He called it the "Big Mo"... That strategy failed...

We shall see...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 06:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. Impressive
:woohoo: :applause: :woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tamburlaine Donating Member (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 06:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. Iowa 1980
Yes, Bush Snr did win in Iowa in 1980 but I don't think it was that big a shock. He had campaigned heavily, and focused his attentions there, while Reagan seemed to have the wider campaign outlook. As it was, Bush only edged out Reagan by 2 points. Hardly the 'Big Mo' that Daddy Bush claimed.

Anyway, anybody who comes up with terms like 'The Big Mo' deserves to lose a nomination. Heavily.

Iowa DID change the whole picture for John Kerry in 2004 but I always thought he had a far deeper pool of support that was waiting to be tapped (if he proved himself viable) than the media reported at the time.

I think the whole inevitability idea would, perhaps temporarily, be punctured (a little like McCain trouncing Bush in New Hampshire in 2000) if Senator Clinton faltered in Iowa. Her opponents are just looking for an opening, any opening, but she is showing precious little evidence of providing them with one at the moment.

'Big Mo' indeed....mutter....mutter....grumble....grumble.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadgerLaw2010 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 06:37 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Kerry's gain is more because of Dean's massive self-inflicted implosion
Edited on Wed Oct-03-07 06:38 AM by BadgerLaw2010
Getting torched in Iowa as "unelectable" was bad enough, but apparently confirming that by going out on stage hyperactive and possibly a bit loaded compounded the issue severely.

So people get the following message from Iowa:

-- It's good to vote for Kerry. Iowa thought he was the most electable.
-- Dean is batshit crazy, don't vote for him.

-

Put it this way: There is no way on Earth that Hillary will make anything close to a Dean-type mistake. Her campaign is shockingly professional and disciplined. They know exactly how to protect a lead, and they are doing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellst0nev0ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 06:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Those Who Repeat Reich-Wing Media Myths Should Be Barred
from voicing political opinions.

The Truth Behind The "Dean Scream"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tamburlaine Donating Member (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 07:01 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. If I may diverge from the point
just a minute. What a peculiar way you have of writing your user name. Was there another Wellstone Voter on DU, or are you simply a blackmailer by profession?

I too agree that Governor Dean was rather hard done by. When Dean fell, they turned on Kerry, it was ever thus, unfortunately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellst0nev0ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Yes, My Original Name Was "wellstonevoter"
but the password didn't work after I registered, so I just did another user name :dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadgerLaw2010 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 07:11 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. It doesn't matter what he actually did. It matters what people perceived through media.
Edited on Wed Oct-03-07 07:16 AM by BadgerLaw2010
If you think "truth" matters, you're the one who should be barred from voicing political opinions. How many people can see Dean in person there? How many see him on TV? How many see him on repeats on the TV?

The solution is to not do something like what Dean did in the first place, precisely because of the risk of it being treated the way it did. Risk-reward is tremendously out of whack. So you don't do it.

Gaffes don't have to be as bad as they look - George Allen's racism was at least as bad as it looked - to be lethal. So don't do anything that remotely looks like a gaffe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellst0nev0ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Shorter BadgerLaw: "Only What's Shown On The Telescreens Matters" (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. Peception Trumps Reality
Say you were on trial for murder and the jury said you did it though you were factually innocent...Would that make you less dead when the state gives you the poison cocktail?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellst0nev0ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #13
29. Does That Make It Right And Should We Perpetuate It?
God, I don't understand why we should easily capitulate to the artifices built up by the Washington press whore media jackholes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. The Scream Became Emblematic Of His Campqaign
It was up to Mr. Dean to demontrate the "scream" didn't define him...

How he could have done that is beyond my ken...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #3
25. Dean's fall was MEDIA-inflicted. We have NO free press. USA = fully morphed Corporate Press. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellst0nev0ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #25
30. Yeppers.
I can't believe so-called "progressives" still fall for that tired media myth even to this day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 06:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. Bravo for Senator Clinton...
Breaking over 50% in the polls at this stage of the game is truly brilliant. Hillary's numbers reflect the due diligence of her campaign team in doing their homework, laying out a strategy, achieving milestones and Hillary closely adhering to an unbelievable schedule orchestrated in double time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. brilliant is a understatement..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. most brilliant!
The thing is, we should never take anything for granted. We have to keep working as if we're 20 pts behind and fighting the good fight until the elections are over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
11. Unbelievable...
At this point one could easily draw the conclusion that the master politician in the Clinton family isn't Bill...it's Hillary!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
12. This is a Dem only poll since it asks questions about voting in the Dem primaries.
Don't most states only allow you to vote in your own party's primary? I know Wisconsin allows "cross-over" voting, but do NH and IA?

While this kind of poll has value, it doesn't tell us much about how Clinton will fare in the GE, altho I have seen one poll that suggests she will do well. So we have to wait and see...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. The Poll Is Of Adults Who Say They Will Vote Democrats
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #17
24. Yes, but in many states it is irrelevant if they can't vote in the primary.
The question was how they would vote in the primary. I have neighbors who told me they were going to vote for Ned Lamont in the primary last year. Well, I looked them up down at Ned's hq in New Haven. They were not registered Democrats and in CT you can only vote in the primary of the party where you are officially registered. In the GE of course it is a different story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. All I Am Inferring From This Poll And The Other Polls Is She's Doing Really Well
Can she stumble?

I guess...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #26
34. Yes, she is doing well. I think she learned some hard lessons over the years.
Of all of our candidates, she is the best one to face down the RW Slime Machine. She's faced it down before...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sundancekid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #17
32. not hardly ... even the lean dem tiny sample has a FAR SMALLER
percentage representation in the poll than the overall proportion who is NEITHER AFFILIATED, NOR LEANS TO EITHER PARTY ... hello?????
Read all about how at some point, they then went and found some more "random" 200+ Afro Americans to add to the sample ... puhlease!

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_100107.html

We should all get into the habit of ACTUALLY VERIFYING the media's self-serving conclusions - to which they will point later and say: see? that's what the polls say ... now, whose rovian tactics does that remind me of???? hmmmmm ... never mind.

This media hype drives serious statisticians totally nuts. What a bunch of hooey - when it comes to the WaPo "parsing" attempt = well at least it's under the right heading: The Fix.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. There's A Plethora Of Polls
Edited on Wed Oct-03-07 11:11 AM by DemocratSinceBirth
and they all show Hillary with leads of around twenty percent or more...

It's interesting that if every single one of them is spurious, they are all spurious in a fashion that's favorable to Ms. Clinton...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
15. She already won! Yiiiipeeee!!!
Edited on Wed Oct-03-07 09:33 AM by Katzenkavalier
:sarcasm:

See you at the polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. Reading Comprehension Must Not Be Your Forte
I said, based on the polls today, it's hard to envision a scenario where Ms. Cinton will lose the nomination...I never said, implicitly or explicitly it's impossible...

If you are confident your candidate will win the nomination I suggest you go here:

http://www.biz.uiowa.edu/iem/markets/nomination08.html

and put your money where your mouth, errr keyboard is...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. If I Can Ever Figure It Out I'm Going To Put A Couple Hundred On Clinton In The Primaries And In The
General.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ethelk2044 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #18
27. Same thing was said about 2004. The polls are not capturing all the voters
A lot of voters only have Cell or VOIP. Those phone numbers are not captured in the polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. I Don't Think Anybody Thought Dean Was Inevitable But Dean And Zogby
I hope we aren't going to get in some arcane discussion of the efficacy of polls...For all their flaws the final polls match up very well with the final election results...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewHampster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
16. After all - Bill Lost New Hampshire
First to win the presidency after losing the NH primary. It has been done.

Us locals just loved Paul Tsongas.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. Clinton Lost IA To The Favorite Son (Harkin) And NH To The Boy Next Door (Tsongas)
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Damn those pesky little facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewHampster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. I love the picture
Which event was that? Obviously one I missed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. The last debate.
Needless to say it has some here seeing red. Just another added bonus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
35. K&R
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC