Candidates in order of preference

[GreenPartyVoter]

1. Kucinich
2. Edwards
3. Kerry
4. Sharpton

[Walt Starr]

1. Edwards

Edwards
Edwards
...
...
...
...
...
Kerry

I see this as a two man race now.

[diamondsoul]

2. Kucinich

Dean
Edwards
Kerry

Sorry guys, he's just left me cold after a couple of weeks of listening to him speak and seeing discrepancies in his record and statements. Be mad if you like, but please spare me the assault. You'll just confirm my feeling about Kerry anyway.

[LSdemocrat]

3. 1. Edwards 2. Kucinich 3. Random Dem Write In 4. Kerry 5. Sharpton

[Indiana_Dem]

4. 1) Kucinich 2)undecided Edwards or Kerry 3) Sharpton

[wtf]

7. hmm

Edwards
Kerry
Sharpton
Kucinich

[a_random_joel]

5. Kerry

Edwards
Sharpton
Kucinich

[genius]

6. That sums up my preferences. Kucinich, Edwards, Kerry, Sharpton.

Good order. The only reason I place Sharpton last though is because we have not had a chance to see how he performs in public office.

[GreenPartyVoter]

9. I like what the Rev has to say, but he has a lot of baggage. :(

[One Taste]

8. Edwards, Kucinich, Kerry, Sharpton

[NoPasaran]

10. ABB

[GreenArrow]

11. Kucinich

Sharpton



Kerry









Edwards

[JasonBerry]

12. 1)Edwards 2)Kerry - the other two have no chance anyway...n/t

[sampsonblk]

13. Clark

1. Clark
2. Dean
3. Kerry
4. Kucinich

*with Harold Ford for Veep!

[tishaLA]

14. Kerry. Kucinich. Sharpton.

[Sean Reynolds]

15. Dean

Kucinich

[MercutioATC]

16. Dean

...just Dean.

If pressed for the top 4, I'd say Clark, Kucinich and Sharpton. I have doubts about Clark's credentials on the war, having been a "neutral" for so long. I don't think that either Kucinich or Sharpton could win in the GE against Bush.

Then Kerry. He and Edwards both represent a vote for the slow death of the party in that they're business-as-usual insiders who have shown how they vote for political convenience rather than principle on some important issues (NCLB, IWR, Patriot Act).

Edwards is last only because he's a bad as Kerry with the added handicap of being vulnerable to Bush attacks on national security.

Again, just my $.02